Swing to Labour (Gillingham) 18:39 - Jun 18 with 1551 views | Zx1988 | Pretty phenomenal stats, given the 2019 result. As someone points out in the replies, if you'd have shown this to someone in the immediate aftermath of the 2019 result, you'd forgive them for thinking that the Tories had committed a genocide or something. |  |
| |  |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 18:42 - Jun 18 with 1511 views | BlueBadger | Well, they WERE responsible for a LOT of preventable deaths through 2020 and 2021. [Post edited 18 Jun 2024 18:59]
|  |
|  |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 18:59 - Jun 18 with 1427 views | BlueBadger |
I'm trying to avoid the 'G' word, because it causes arguments. |  |
|  |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 19:33 - Jun 18 with 1340 views | NthQldITFC |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 18:59 - Jun 18 by BlueBadger | I'm trying to avoid the 'G' word, because it causes arguments. |
'Goolies!' |  |
|  |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 19:38 - Jun 18 with 1330 views | lowhouseblue | i honestly thought it would be impossible to turn 2019 around in one go. but events, the unimaginable awfulness of the tories and the safe hands of starmer seem to be achieving the impossible. |  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
|  |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 19:43 - Jun 18 with 1290 views | Zx1988 |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 19:38 - Jun 18 by lowhouseblue | i honestly thought it would be impossible to turn 2019 around in one go. but events, the unimaginable awfulness of the tories and the safe hands of starmer seem to be achieving the impossible. |
Any decent Labour leader would be 33pts ahead though. |  |
|  |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 19:51 - Jun 18 with 1246 views | exeterblue10 |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 19:33 - Jun 18 by NthQldITFC | 'Goolies!' |
Gorleston |  | |  |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 20:39 - Jun 18 with 1167 views | Nthsuffolkblue | FURTHER EDIT: Forget that, 3% were other parties and somehow my maths was wrong not theirs! [Post edited 18 Jun 2024 20:47]
|  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 20:43 - Jun 18 with 1150 views | WeWereZombies |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 20:39 - Jun 18 by Nthsuffolkblue | FURTHER EDIT: Forget that, 3% were other parties and somehow my maths was wrong not theirs! [Post edited 18 Jun 2024 20:47]
|
You've added in the 15% for Deform that is new, leave that out and the numbers work (apart from a missing 3% which I guess was 'others'.) |  |
|  |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 20:49 - Jun 18 with 1129 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 20:43 - Jun 18 by WeWereZombies | You've added in the 15% for Deform that is new, leave that out and the numbers work (apart from a missing 3% which I guess was 'others'.) |
Yes, adding in the +15 leaves it as 3% out and that was shared between an independent and a fringe party. |  |
|  |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 20:52 - Jun 18 with 1101 views | GeoffSentence |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 19:33 - Jun 18 by NthQldITFC | 'Goolies!' |
HA. That was the word going through my mind. Then I scrolled down and saw this. |  |
|  |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 20:53 - Jun 18 with 1097 views | WeWereZombies |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 20:49 - Jun 18 by Nthsuffolkblue | Yes, adding in the +15 leaves it as 3% out and that was shared between an independent and a fringe party. |
Interesting that the Conservative vote shedding seems to be 27 per cent to Labour and only 12 per cent to the far right, with the other three per cent of their prospective votes coming from the independent and other party. |  |
|  |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 20:54 - Jun 18 with 1080 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Swing to Labour (Gillingham) on 20:53 - Jun 18 by WeWereZombies | Interesting that the Conservative vote shedding seems to be 27 per cent to Labour and only 12 per cent to the far right, with the other three per cent of their prospective votes coming from the independent and other party. |
That's in very simplistic terms. It could easily be that there is a lot of other shifts that cancel out to leave that overall impression. |  |
|  |
| |