Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
A Day That Will Live In infamy... 06:47 - Sep 5 with 2669 viewsTangledupin_Blue

Just two years ago today, though sometimes it feels that it was a different lifetime, Britain's "Me, Me, Me" adherents made a choice. From a population of about 66 million they chose Lizard Truss to be Conservative Party leader and, ergo, PM.

They managed the virtually impossible feat of finding a 'leader' who was not an upgrade on her predecessor, Poison Boris.

I say 'sometimes' it feels like a different lifetime but the financial repercussions seem fresh enough and now they are thrashing about in the same cesspool in search of their next grotesque figurehead.

Poll: Which Two Will Gain Automatic Promotion?

0
A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 07:28 - Sep 5 with 2541 viewsChurchman

The odd thing about that was that everybody knew she was useless and stupid. Yet they still chose her. It was little different to knowing that sitting on a bonfire was a dumb idea and doing it anyway.

It will be amusing to see who the next idiot is, but only that given the party for privilege are out of office for a generation so are utterly irrelevant.

Edit: Despite the obvious harm she and her chums did, the thick hag still thinks she was right. Bonkers
[Post edited 5 Sep 7:31]
1
A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 08:11 - Sep 5 with 2428 viewsHelp

At least one of the previous regime has been voted out of becoming the next conservative party leader

Poll: What time will the signing announcement be today

0
A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 08:36 - Sep 5 with 2356 viewsWeWereZombies

A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 07:28 - Sep 5 by Churchman

The odd thing about that was that everybody knew she was useless and stupid. Yet they still chose her. It was little different to knowing that sitting on a bonfire was a dumb idea and doing it anyway.

It will be amusing to see who the next idiot is, but only that given the party for privilege are out of office for a generation so are utterly irrelevant.

Edit: Despite the obvious harm she and her chums did, the thick hag still thinks she was right. Bonkers
[Post edited 5 Sep 7:31]


But did they know she was, if not useless and stupid, misguided and easily led astray by extremist theories and rhetoric ? She was foisted upon us by a small percentage of the populace who were, for the most part, just as susceptible to radical ideologies as she was. I think there is a lesson to be learnt about a political system that allows that and how it needs to be adapted so that a representative of an extreme minority cannot end up having a significant influence on the lives of the majority, even if it is for just a fortnight (or the best part of a lettuce's lifetime.) This could also be appropriate if there are circumstances in the future that see Keir Starmer toppled by an internal party dispute and, say, Jeremy Corbyn installed in his place.

Poll: What was in Wes Burns' imaginary cup of tea ?

0
A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 08:51 - Sep 5 with 2282 viewsKeno

Infamy Infamy she sure had it infamy

Poll: IF TWTD was a constituency who'd you vote for?
Blog: [Blog] My World Cup Reflections

0
A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 09:06 - Sep 5 with 2233 viewsChurchman

A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 08:36 - Sep 5 by WeWereZombies

But did they know she was, if not useless and stupid, misguided and easily led astray by extremist theories and rhetoric ? She was foisted upon us by a small percentage of the populace who were, for the most part, just as susceptible to radical ideologies as she was. I think there is a lesson to be learnt about a political system that allows that and how it needs to be adapted so that a representative of an extreme minority cannot end up having a significant influence on the lives of the majority, even if it is for just a fortnight (or the best part of a lettuce's lifetime.) This could also be appropriate if there are circumstances in the future that see Keir Starmer toppled by an internal party dispute and, say, Jeremy Corbyn installed in his place.


Yes. She’d held a number of government posts and was known to be useless and impossible to work with in every single one. A colleague of mine worked directly for her at MoJ and I don’t think she’ll be on his Christmas card list. Only Chris Grayling (DoT) topped her on the idiot scale.

How and why the tories’ cabal elected her mystifies me. I’ve always felt that if a leader changes a GE should be held. I know it’s the party that’s elected in theory and that’s what successive governments have held on to for decades - but it should be changed in my view.
0
A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 10:27 - Sep 5 with 2115 viewsOldsmoker

Apart from devaluing everyones pension pot by 30%, what did Liz Truss ever do for us?

Don't believe a word I say. I'm only kidding. Or am I?
Poll: What mode is best?

2
A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 11:25 - Sep 5 with 1973 viewsTangledupin_Blue

A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 07:28 - Sep 5 by Churchman

The odd thing about that was that everybody knew she was useless and stupid. Yet they still chose her. It was little different to knowing that sitting on a bonfire was a dumb idea and doing it anyway.

It will be amusing to see who the next idiot is, but only that given the party for privilege are out of office for a generation so are utterly irrelevant.

Edit: Despite the obvious harm she and her chums did, the thick hag still thinks she was right. Bonkers
[Post edited 5 Sep 7:31]


I wouldn't bet the house on your second paragraph. People were saying similar things about Labour immediately after their crushing defeat in 2019. And this time around, although Labour's victory was huge, it was on a low turnout and plenty of those who voted Labour did so without enthusiasm.

Poll: Which Two Will Gain Automatic Promotion?

0
A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 12:14 - Sep 5 with 1878 viewsElephantintheRoom

A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 11:25 - Sep 5 by Tangledupin_Blue

I wouldn't bet the house on your second paragraph. People were saying similar things about Labour immediately after their crushing defeat in 2019. And this time around, although Labour's victory was huge, it was on a low turnout and plenty of those who voted Labour did so without enthusiasm.


Starmer’s Labour got fewer votes than Corbyn’s Labour did it not? The difference between electoral wipe out and a landslide majority is wafer thin.

Mind you I cant see Kemi Badenough swooping in on Downing St with a smaller vote than Sunak managed.

Blog: The Swinging Sixty

0
Login to get fewer ads

A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 13:49 - Sep 5 with 1654 viewskeighleyblue

A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 11:25 - Sep 5 by Tangledupin_Blue

I wouldn't bet the house on your second paragraph. People were saying similar things about Labour immediately after their crushing defeat in 2019. And this time around, although Labour's victory was huge, it was on a low turnout and plenty of those who voted Labour did so without enthusiasm.


Really? I was bl00dy enthusiastic.
2
A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 16:16 - Sep 5 with 1497 viewsBlueForYou

A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 07:28 - Sep 5 by Churchman

The odd thing about that was that everybody knew she was useless and stupid. Yet they still chose her. It was little different to knowing that sitting on a bonfire was a dumb idea and doing it anyway.

It will be amusing to see who the next idiot is, but only that given the party for privilege are out of office for a generation so are utterly irrelevant.

Edit: Despite the obvious harm she and her chums did, the thick hag still thinks she was right. Bonkers
[Post edited 5 Sep 7:31]


Even they couldnt stoop so low as to take money off Pensioners!
0
A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 16:24 - Sep 5 with 1467 viewsmutters

When I saw the title of this thread, I thought it was going to be about the infamous game against Stockport on that cold, miserable Tuesday night back in '97

Poll: At what price would you sell our 32 year old Leading Scorer Murphy this summer?

1
A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 16:32 - Sep 5 with 1447 viewsFreddies_Ears

A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 16:16 - Sep 5 by BlueForYou

Even they couldnt stoop so low as to take money off Pensioners!


By not inflation-proofing tax thresholds, that is exactly what they did. Leaving us now in the ridiculous position that many people on the basic state pension are likely to tart giving some of it back in income tax.
Reducing NI was another hit, as pensioners don't pay it. Instead, they could have changed tax thresholds...
1
A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 17:38 - Sep 5 with 1292 viewsBlueForYou

A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 16:32 - Sep 5 by Freddies_Ears

By not inflation-proofing tax thresholds, that is exactly what they did. Leaving us now in the ridiculous position that many people on the basic state pension are likely to tart giving some of it back in income tax.
Reducing NI was another hit, as pensioners don't pay it. Instead, they could have changed tax thresholds...


One of the Conservative policies was to give pensioners their own raised threshold to deal with that. Labours attitude to pensioners is despicable.
0
A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 09:52 - Sep 6 with 934 viewsArnoldMoorhen

A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 09:06 - Sep 5 by Churchman

Yes. She’d held a number of government posts and was known to be useless and impossible to work with in every single one. A colleague of mine worked directly for her at MoJ and I don’t think she’ll be on his Christmas card list. Only Chris Grayling (DoT) topped her on the idiot scale.

How and why the tories’ cabal elected her mystifies me. I’ve always felt that if a leader changes a GE should be held. I know it’s the party that’s elected in theory and that’s what successive governments have held on to for decades - but it should be changed in my view.


"How and why the tories’ cabal elected her mystifies me."

My theory is that a load of blurry eyed 70 and 80 something year old men found that she reminded them a bit of Thatcher, their loins twitched for the first time in decades, and they voted with their dicks.

Horrifyingly that is the most plausible explanation that I can conjure up.
0
A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 10:40 - Sep 6 with 865 viewsRadioOrwell

A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 17:38 - Sep 5 by BlueForYou

One of the Conservative policies was to give pensioners their own raised threshold to deal with that. Labours attitude to pensioners is despicable.


Tories attitude to everyone is despicable.
0
A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 16:14 - Sep 6 with 757 viewsRadlett_blue

A Day That Will Live In infamy... on 08:36 - Sep 5 by WeWereZombies

But did they know she was, if not useless and stupid, misguided and easily led astray by extremist theories and rhetoric ? She was foisted upon us by a small percentage of the populace who were, for the most part, just as susceptible to radical ideologies as she was. I think there is a lesson to be learnt about a political system that allows that and how it needs to be adapted so that a representative of an extreme minority cannot end up having a significant influence on the lives of the majority, even if it is for just a fortnight (or the best part of a lettuce's lifetime.) This could also be appropriate if there are circumstances in the future that see Keir Starmer toppled by an internal party dispute and, say, Jeremy Corbyn installed in his place.


The Conservatives foolishly followed Labour in "boosting internal party democracy" by allowing members to choose their leader, which first produced the unelectable Ian "Duncan" Smith. While this system has also produced unelectable leaders like Corbyn & Truss, members are only effectively shooting themselves in the foot by supporting such candidates.

Poll: Should horse racing be banned in the UK?

1




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024