Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Their goal 20:12 - Dec 14 with 1841 viewsleftback

Deflection or not??
[Post edited 14 Dec 2024 20:12]
0
Their goal on 20:14 - Dec 14 with 1812 viewsMullet

Yep. I was right in line with it and it seemed clear in real time to me

Poll: Which itfc kit do you usually buy
Blog: When the Fanzine Comes Around

1
Their goal on 20:36 - Dec 14 with 1703 viewsArnieM

I’ve looked at it several times now and I must admit I can’t see a deflection anywhere. The ball never changed direction in flight from what I could see.

Poll: Would this current Town team beat the current narwich team

0
Their goal on 20:44 - Dec 14 with 1644 viewsbluefunk

Their goal on 20:36 - Dec 14 by ArnieM

I’ve looked at it several times now and I must admit I can’t see a deflection anywhere. The ball never changed direction in flight from what I could see.


They showed an angle from behind Muric and it definitely took a deflection, enough to take it last him
3
Their goal on 20:52 - Dec 14 with 1553 viewsitfc_bucks

100%.

Comes off Clarke's toe, but it's a clear deflection.
1
Their goal on 21:03 - Dec 14 with 1464 viewsmickymills

It deflected off Clarke. I was right behind it. Made just enough difference to prevent Muric from getting hands on it.
0
Their goal on 21:43 - Dec 14 with 1242 viewsMK1

Yes. Looked enough to get it past Muric. Really not sure why there is a pile on for Muric to be dropped. He had a good game again today. Leave the lad alone.

Poll: New hobby suggestions for NeedhamChris.

7
Their goal on 21:45 - Dec 14 with 1226 viewsWicklowBlue

Even The42 here in Ireland said there was a deflection. We were super exposed in the right during that period. Once Cajuste went off things changed, perhaps Burns and Clarke were knackered too.
[Post edited 14 Dec 2024 22:29]
1
Their goal on 21:46 - Dec 14 with 1208 viewsbournemouthblue

Their goal on 21:03 - Dec 14 by mickymills

It deflected off Clarke. I was right behind it. Made just enough difference to prevent Muric from getting hands on it.


A last ditch attempt from Clarke to block, having made the mistake initially and ended up horribly out of position

Alcohol is the answer but I can't remember the question!
Poll: How much for Omari

0
Login to get fewer ads

Their goal on 22:08 - Dec 14 with 1118 viewsDJR

I was seated behind the scorer in a straight line from him to Muric and the goal, so had a perfect view of the goal and didn't notice any deflection.

Even if there was a deflection, at such a narrow angle a deflection should have made no difference. Maybe Muric had set himself up for the cross but there was a big gap between him and the near post, and he also reacted slowly to the shot.

The four of us sitting there all thought Muric was clearly at fault because of his positioning, but fortunately it turned out alright in the end.
[Post edited 14 Dec 2024 22:22]
-4
Their goal on 22:24 - Dec 14 with 1027 viewsDennyx4

Their goal on 22:08 - Dec 14 by DJR

I was seated behind the scorer in a straight line from him to Muric and the goal, so had a perfect view of the goal and didn't notice any deflection.

Even if there was a deflection, at such a narrow angle a deflection should have made no difference. Maybe Muric had set himself up for the cross but there was a big gap between him and the near post, and he also reacted slowly to the shot.

The four of us sitting there all thought Muric was clearly at fault because of his positioning, but fortunately it turned out alright in the end.
[Post edited 14 Dec 2024 22:22]


Definite deflection that took it past Muric. There was a replay from behind the goal that clearly shows the deflection.

Muric had no chance with the goal.
3
Their goal on 22:40 - Dec 14 with 926 viewsDinDjarin

Was at that end and thought deflected at the time and watching it back confirmed it as took a nick of Clarke
0
Their goal on 22:44 - Dec 14 with 883 viewsStewart27

Their goal on 22:08 - Dec 14 by DJR

I was seated behind the scorer in a straight line from him to Muric and the goal, so had a perfect view of the goal and didn't notice any deflection.

Even if there was a deflection, at such a narrow angle a deflection should have made no difference. Maybe Muric had set himself up for the cross but there was a big gap between him and the near post, and he also reacted slowly to the shot.

The four of us sitting there all thought Muric was clearly at fault because of his positioning, but fortunately it turned out alright in the end.
[Post edited 14 Dec 2024 22:22]


100% deflection.

Really supported that this is being made to be subjective.
0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025