Cunha charged 10:32 - Dec 17 with 6211 views | SitfcB | |  |
| |  |
Cunha charged on 16:08 - Dec 17 with 1317 views | FrankfurtBlue |
Cunha charged on 12:37 - Dec 17 by _clive_baker_ | Had he done that to an opposition player on the pitch it’s violent conduct and at least a 3 game ban. That feels like a minimum in this instance, perhaps with a 4th on top for good measure. |
Never seen an opposition player with glasses. |  | |  |
Cunha charged on 16:19 - Dec 17 with 1270 views | positivity |
Cunha charged on 16:08 - Dec 17 by FrankfurtBlue | Never seen an opposition player with glasses. |
edgar davids? |  |
|  |
I think they did that.... on 16:25 - Dec 17 with 1244 views | Bloots |
Cunha charged on 15:58 - Dec 17 by Basuco | The FA could hold the hearing on Friday, I'm sure they have done this in the past when a club tried to get a player to miss a more winnable match, but might be mistaken. |
....with the budgies last week. They appealed McLean's elbow and the FA told them 5 hours before kick off that the appeal had failed. That'll learn 'em. |  |
| "The sooner he comes back the better, this place has been a disaster without him" - TWTD User (July 2025) |
|  |
I think they did that.... on 16:30 - Dec 17 with 1202 views | positivity |
I think they did that.... on 16:25 - Dec 17 by Bloots | ....with the budgies last week. They appealed McLean's elbow and the FA told them 5 hours before kick off that the appeal had failed. That'll learn 'em. |
isn't it a bonus to have mclean unavailable? |  |
|  |
Yeah, he got a 5 game ban.... on 17:01 - Dec 17 with 1114 views | Bloots |
I think they did that.... on 16:30 - Dec 17 by positivity | isn't it a bonus to have mclean unavailable? |
....the budgies were appealing for 6. |  |
| "The sooner he comes back the better, this place has been a disaster without him" - TWTD User (July 2025) |
|  |
Cunha charged on 18:01 - Dec 17 with 1000 views | Basuco |
Cunha charged on 16:19 - Dec 17 by positivity | edgar davids? |
I asked my optician why a Glaucoma sufferer would need to wear glasses, he replied that opticians had asked the same question. |  | |  |
Cunha charged on 20:26 - Dec 17 with 856 views | Suffolktractor |
Cunha charged on 15:40 - Dec 17 by Metal_Hacker | How can they appeal an elbow to the back of the head followed by nicking the guy’s glasses ffs ?! |
‘It wasn’t him guvnor what did it, it was someone else in an orange jumper.’ So unlucky they put players names on the back of their shirts now! |  | |  |
Cunha charged on 21:02 - Dec 17 with 814 views | redrickstuhaart |
Cunha charged on 20:26 - Dec 17 by Suffolktractor | ‘It wasn’t him guvnor what did it, it was someone else in an orange jumper.’ So unlucky they put players names on the back of their shirts now! |
They describe it on the radio as "clashed with security staff". Why cant people say what actually happened. Elbowed a bloke int he back of the head without warning and that swiped his glassess off. |  | |  | Login to get fewer ads
Cunha charged on 21:10 - Dec 17 with 800 views | IpswichTownBlue |
Cunha charged on 15:35 - Dec 17 by AbujaBlue | Some reports that they are appealing it, which means he could play against Leicester? |
Not surprising- but sad if Wolves'appeal. Looking at the footage I can't see any way in which Cunha was provoked? If its your player you accept the rightful ban and teach them a lesson- get that he's an important player for Wolves though and that's all they'll care about.. [Post edited 17 Dec 2024 21:10]
|  | |  |
Cunha charged on 22:23 - Dec 17 with 692 views | Exiled2Surrey |
Cunha charged on 21:10 - Dec 17 by IpswichTownBlue | Not surprising- but sad if Wolves'appeal. Looking at the footage I can't see any way in which Cunha was provoked? If its your player you accept the rightful ban and teach them a lesson- get that he's an important player for Wolves though and that's all they'll care about.. [Post edited 17 Dec 2024 21:10]
|
Might he be sold in January (given their owners)? Might never play for them again - what a way to go out…. |  | |  |
| |