| Southampton didn’t want to pay the compensation for Rhol or Corberan 08:50 - Dec 20 with 2363 views | SitfcB |
So going for an unknown in English football.
This and the new Wolves manager seem good appointments for us IMO. |  |
| |  |
| Southampton didn’t want to pay the compensation for Rhol or Corberan on 08:52 - Dec 20 with 2323 views | Kieran_Knows |
Never fails to amaze me that clubs won't spend £5-£10m on a decent manager, but will happily pay £30m+ for average players. |  |
| |
| Southampton didn’t want to pay the compensation for Rhol or Corberan on 08:55 - Dec 20 with 2260 views | Clutch |
He left Roma already didn't he?
I'd be annoyed if we appointed either manager, both don't stay at clubs long. |  | | |
| Southampton didn’t want to pay the compensation for Rhol or Corberan on 09:06 - Dec 20 with 2141 views | CaptainAhab |
Probably makes sense, whoever they go for they're going to get relegated and he'll be sacked anyway, so best not to spend too much money hey |  | | |
| Southampton didn’t want to pay the compensation for Rhol or Corberan on 09:12 - Dec 20 with 2051 views | HampBlue |
He's in to be thrown under the bus for the rest of the season, sacked when they get relegated and then they'll go for Rohl/ Corberan when they're a far more attractive proposition. [Post edited 20 Dec 2024 9:12]
| | | |
| Southampton didn’t want to pay the compensation for Rhol or Corberan on 09:31 - Dec 20 with 1896 views | Daninthecampo |
Martin had a massive payoff, they didn't want to get rid of him because of it but were left with no choice.
[Post edited 20 Dec 2024 9:32]
| | | |
| Southampton didn’t want to pay the compensation for Rhol or Corberan on 09:42 - Dec 20 with 1762 views | BlueBadger |
| Southampton didn’t want to pay the compensation for Rhol or Corberan on 09:31 - Dec 20 by Daninthecampo |
Martin had a massive payoff, they didn't want to get rid of him because of it but were left with no choice.
[Post edited 20 Dec 2024 9:32]
|
....and again, the parallels with Lambert keep on coming. |  |
| |
| Southampton didn’t want to pay the compensation for Rhol or Corberan on 09:45 - Dec 20 with 1723 views | BloomBlue |
| Southampton didn’t want to pay the compensation for Rhol or Corberan on 08:52 - Dec 20 by Kieran_Knows |
Never fails to amaze me that clubs won't spend £5-£10m on a decent manager, but will happily pay £30m+ for average players. |
Is that because of how the financial rules work?
I'm sure I saw something recently where a club can spread the cost of a player fee across the length of their contract within Financial rules but compensation to another club for a manager has to be included as a one off payment in that financial year |  | | |
| Southampton didn’t want to pay the compensation for Rhol or Corberan on 10:59 - Dec 20 with 1400 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Southampton didn’t want to pay the compensation for Rhol or Corberan on 09:31 - Dec 20 by Daninthecampo |
Martin had a massive payoff, they didn't want to get rid of him because of it but were left with no choice.
[Post edited 20 Dec 2024 9:32]
|
I cant imagine the pay off figure would be so high that it would outweigh the risk of relegation? |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Southampton didn’t want to pay the compensation for Rhol or Corberan on 12:27 - Dec 20 with 1130 views | gainsboroughblue |
Rohl would have been a lamb to the slaughter there this season. I've got him on my own personal shortlist to replace KMc when that sad moment comes. |  |
| |
| Southampton didn’t want to pay the compensation for Rhol or Corberan on 12:28 - Dec 20 with 1126 views | bsw72 |
| Southampton didn’t want to pay the compensation for Rhol or Corberan on 09:31 - Dec 20 by Daninthecampo |
Martin had a massive payoff, they didn't want to get rid of him because of it but were left with no choice.
[Post edited 20 Dec 2024 9:32]
|
I doubt the payoff is significant compared to player costs and relegation. I believe his salary to be around £2M per annum, with a contract due to run to 2027.
They will not have paid the full amount of outstanding contract, more like 50%-70%, so based on 70% of 2.5 years, will be around £3.5M at a guess. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
