Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . 11:29 - Apr 7 with 2758 viewsbsw72

. . . and with that failed he goes immediately.

For all my frustration and disappointment this season with the PL, I feel the club is in such a better position than the other 2 doomed to relegation, and possibly a number in the Championship.

Fingers crossed for no major summer curve balls (ie McKenna leaving).
10
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 11:46 - Apr 7 with 2589 viewsBloomBlue

They will probably go for a one season contract with Dyche just to [try] get them promoted
0
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 11:54 - Apr 7 with 2518 viewsNeedhamChris

They'd have been better off sticking with RM for continuity

Winner of the "most obvious troll ever seen on here" award, sponsored by _Clive_Baker
Poll: If McKenna had gone to Brighton - do you think we'd have had...

3
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 11:59 - Apr 7 with 2489 viewsParisBlue

Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 11:46 - Apr 7 by BloomBlue

They will probably go for a one season contract with Dyche just to [try] get them promoted


Danny Rohl for sure.

Libraries gave us power
Poll: Which position in the table will we be after Saturday?

1
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 12:09 - Apr 7 with 2408 viewstonybied

Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 11:59 - Apr 7 by ParisBlue

Danny Rohl for sure.


I was just coming here to say exactly the same. It's been rumoured for a while hasn't it. I expect the Sheff Wed shenanigans is just likely to push Rohl closer to the door there too!
1
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 12:11 - Apr 7 with 2387 viewsLinners

Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 12:09 - Apr 7 by tonybied

I was just coming here to say exactly the same. It's been rumoured for a while hasn't it. I expect the Sheff Wed shenanigans is just likely to push Rohl closer to the door there too!


I'd be more disappointed if they went for Liam Rosenior. I might be way off, but I do like him as a potential successor to McK if required.
2
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 12:36 - Apr 7 with 2248 viewsBellevue_Blue

Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 12:11 - Apr 7 by Linners

I'd be more disappointed if they went for Liam Rosenior. I might be way off, but I do like him as a potential successor to McK if required.


I can't see why Rosenior would take it. He's on the precipice of being a Champions League manager and with the links to Chelsea, if he carries on doing well he might well get a shot at that when it inevitably comes up in the next few years.

They will go for Rohl, almost guaranteed but hopefully the comp they have paid to sack managers & get Rohl will weaken them before next year.

I suspect Ruud will also get the sack at Leicester with just one positive result from the last 15 games.

We should, all being well go in with a bit of a head start on those two.
1
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 12:45 - Apr 7 with 2178 viewsExiled2Surrey

Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 12:36 - Apr 7 by Bellevue_Blue

I can't see why Rosenior would take it. He's on the precipice of being a Champions League manager and with the links to Chelsea, if he carries on doing well he might well get a shot at that when it inevitably comes up in the next few years.

They will go for Rohl, almost guaranteed but hopefully the comp they have paid to sack managers & get Rohl will weaken them before next year.

I suspect Ruud will also get the sack at Leicester with just one positive result from the last 15 games.

We should, all being well go in with a bit of a head start on those two.


Farke might be looking for a job this summer - he is ideal for Leicester
0
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 13:24 - Apr 7 with 1977 viewsRadlett_blue

all this does is make me even more annoyed that we lost at home to Southampton this season.

Poll: Should horse racing be banned in the UK?

3
Login to get fewer ads

Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 13:49 - Apr 7 with 1891 viewsbsw72

Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 13:24 - Apr 7 by Radlett_blue

all this does is make me even more annoyed that we lost at home to Southampton this season.


My torn achilles pretty much ended my professional football career*.



*Note that I was 39, overweight and had never played a professional football match in my life, but it certainly ended any ambition I had to do so
2
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 13:50 - Apr 7 with 1883 viewsAlanG296

So the 3 clubs promoted last season, to be the 3 relegated clubs this season, get rid of 3 managers this season between them. Not 1 per club though, perhaps fortunately for McK.
0
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 13:53 - Apr 7 with 1855 viewsNthsuffolkblue

This smacks of there being a clause that allowed them to dismiss him on relegation with reduced compensation. Clearly he has not improved them since he came in and I guess they were resigned to their fate and held off sacking him until now. The ability of both them and Leicester to appoint worse than they dismissed has done us a favour. It's just a shame Wolves couldn't do the same.

Poll: How do you feel about the re-election of Trump?
Blog: [Blog] Ghostbusters

0
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 14:32 - Apr 7 with 1733 viewsSwansea_Blue

Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 13:53 - Apr 7 by Nthsuffolkblue

This smacks of there being a clause that allowed them to dismiss him on relegation with reduced compensation. Clearly he has not improved them since he came in and I guess they were resigned to their fate and held off sacking him until now. The ability of both them and Leicester to appoint worse than they dismissed has done us a favour. It's just a shame Wolves couldn't do the same.


They got caught with Martin when he left Swansea, as they triggered a higher release fee by contacting him before the end of the season. I’m not sure how that was resolved. It’s was only the matter of a million or two, which is peanuts for them, but it dragged on with the lawyers for months. I’m not sure how it was resolved but it must have been unnecessary hassle. So yes, I suspect they’re being overly cautious about not getting caught out again.

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

0
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 15:02 - Apr 7 with 1619 viewsRadlett_blue

Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 13:53 - Apr 7 by Nthsuffolkblue

This smacks of there being a clause that allowed them to dismiss him on relegation with reduced compensation. Clearly he has not improved them since he came in and I guess they were resigned to their fate and held off sacking him until now. The ability of both them and Leicester to appoint worse than they dismissed has done us a favour. It's just a shame Wolves couldn't do the same.


Yes, Wolves had a decent squad that O'Neill blatantly wasn't getting anywhere near the best out of.

Poll: Should horse racing be banned in the UK?

0
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 18:45 - Apr 7 with 1368 viewsJimmyJazz

Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 12:45 - Apr 7 by Exiled2Surrey

Farke might be looking for a job this summer - he is ideal for Leicester


Sky Sports said they want someone who has won promotion previously - they mentioned Wagner!!

Poll: If we could perm sign just one, which would it be?
Blog: Top Championship Teams?

0
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 19:16 - Apr 7 with 1300 viewsTheBoyBlue

Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 13:53 - Apr 7 by Nthsuffolkblue

This smacks of there being a clause that allowed them to dismiss him on relegation with reduced compensation. Clearly he has not improved them since he came in and I guess they were resigned to their fate and held off sacking him until now. The ability of both them and Leicester to appoint worse than they dismissed has done us a favour. It's just a shame Wolves couldn't do the same.


In hindsight it would be pointless any of the bottom 3 changing manager because I'm not sure any manager could have saved any of us, all things considered.

Southampton may as well have kept Martin and give him a crack to get them back up and Leicester definitely should've kept Cooper who seemed the best equipped to keep any of the promoted sides up if anyone could.

However, Wolves - in keeping with the other 16 clubs above us - have a squad that's just too good to get relegated if managed properly so changing manager was a shot.

Like you say, just a pity that they chose so well! Similarly Everton and West Ham.

Blog: [Blog] The Homer Simpson of the Championship

0
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 00:02 - Apr 8 with 1016 viewsalgy

Seems a bit harsh not keeping him. He won as many League games at Portman Road this season as McKenna has. Although same can be said for 10 other managers.

I was there when McKenna's ITFC won in the Premier League at Home.

0
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 01:20 - Apr 8 with 953 viewsStNeotsBlue

Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 12:36 - Apr 7 by Bellevue_Blue

I can't see why Rosenior would take it. He's on the precipice of being a Champions League manager and with the links to Chelsea, if he carries on doing well he might well get a shot at that when it inevitably comes up in the next few years.

They will go for Rohl, almost guaranteed but hopefully the comp they have paid to sack managers & get Rohl will weaken them before next year.

I suspect Ruud will also get the sack at Leicester with just one positive result from the last 15 games.

We should, all being well go in with a bit of a head start on those two.


You're right about Rohl being the favourite for the Southampton job but where have you got Rosenior's links to Chelsea from? There aren't any.
0
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 07:07 - Apr 8 with 783 viewsNeedhamChris

Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 01:20 - Apr 8 by StNeotsBlue

You're right about Rohl being the favourite for the Southampton job but where have you got Rosenior's links to Chelsea from? There aren't any.


He's talking about Strasbourg's links to Chelsea not Roseniors.

They're part of the same multi club ownership model (see Man City, Girona etc)

Winner of the "most obvious troll ever seen on here" award, sponsored by _Clive_Baker
Poll: If McKenna had gone to Brighton - do you think we'd have had...

0
Seems that Juric had one objective . . . on 07:15 - Apr 8 with 759 viewsClutch

And the kid in the year below me from school is now their manager (again!)

They'll be around the playoffs again next year for definite.
0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025