| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes 17:32 - Aug 22 with 1018 views | Vic |
I’ll be very sad. I’ve loved Wolfie’s style since the day I saw him on his debut many moons ago. So classy.
But, romantic stuff aside, am I right in thinking that replacing him with an established Uroguayan international actually strengthens the squad stronger over all? [Post edited 22 Aug 17:33]
|  |
| |  |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 17:34 - Aug 22 with 973 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
It absolutely will strengthen us. There will be a real bun fight for those centre back places. |  |
| |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 17:35 - Aug 22 with 954 views | Ryorry |
Uppie for your opening para (me too).
Guess we'd have to waite & see re your second para! |  |
| |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 17:37 - Aug 22 with 935 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 17:35 - Aug 22 by Ryorry |
Uppie for your opening para (me too).
Guess we'd have to waite & see re your second para! |
Terry Waite and see? | |
| |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 17:42 - Aug 22 with 898 views | Ryorry |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 17:37 - Aug 22 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Terry Waite and see? |
Hah! What he went through should be a lesson in patience to us all. Sadly, some on here probably won't even know his name. | |
| |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 17:47 - Aug 22 with 846 views | pointofblue |
Yes. It doesn't take away the hurt but bringing Caceres in should strengthen us on paper. Of course we've brought in better players on paper over the past year and improvement, for now, has been negligible. |  |
| |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 20:03 - Aug 22 with 589 views | John_Warks_Willy |
Yes. This one will hurt a bit, for sure. |  |
| |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 21:11 - Aug 22 with 362 views | ghostofescobar |
Love Woolfy for obvious reasons, but the reality is he is not a top class defender. I have always thought that he gets turned frighteningly easy, and switches off too often. With the ball in front of him, he’s fine, good distributor of the ball, but up close and with players turning him, too vulnerable. But, I’d be sad to see him go for emotional reasons. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 21:15 - Aug 22 with 333 views | Vic |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 17:42 - Aug 22 by Ryorry |
Hah! What he went through should be a lesson in patience to us all. Sadly, some on here probably won't even know his name. |
Sorry, fat fingers. Meant to uppie, obviously! | |
| |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 21:27 - Aug 22 with 271 views | ArnieM |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 21:11 - Aug 22 by ghostofescobar |
Love Woolfy for obvious reasons, but the reality is he is not a top class defender. I have always thought that he gets turned frighteningly easy, and switches off too often. With the ball in front of him, he’s fine, good distributor of the ball, but up close and with players turning him, too vulnerable. But, I’d be sad to see him go for emotional reasons. |
Quite agree with you. Overrated as a centre back in my view ( Mckenna clearly doesn't crate him because he rarely plays him and hit in O'Shea). But Woolfenden is put on a pedestal primarily because hes come through the academy. He's "easy on the eye", but lacks so much as a centre back
(heading ability, physical presence in the box, commanding his opponent in the box, tackling, pace). He " walks" the ball out of defence and generally passed it to hus right 2 meters so our build up from defence is so slow.
Cue the down votes, couldnt give a sh it.... hes not good enough |  |
| |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 21:28 - Aug 22 with 263 views | pointofblue |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 21:11 - Aug 22 by ghostofescobar |
Love Woolfy for obvious reasons, but the reality is he is not a top class defender. I have always thought that he gets turned frighteningly easy, and switches off too often. With the ball in front of him, he’s fine, good distributor of the ball, but up close and with players turning him, too vulnerable. But, I’d be sad to see him go for emotional reasons. |
Personal opinion is that would be a valid criticism in the early days of McKenna but I think he's improved massively on that score. He hasn't switched off as much when getting the chance over the past couple of seasons and has been far more accomplished in not being turned either. | |
| |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 21:29 - Aug 22 with 254 views | mrfixit426 |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 21:27 - Aug 22 by ArnieM |
Quite agree with you. Overrated as a centre back in my view ( Mckenna clearly doesn't crate him because he rarely plays him and hit in O'Shea). But Woolfenden is put on a pedestal primarily because hes come through the academy. He's "easy on the eye", but lacks so much as a centre back
(heading ability, physical presence in the box, commanding his opponent in the box, tackling, pace). He " walks" the ball out of defence and generally passed it to hus right 2 meters so our build up from defence is so slow.
Cue the down votes, couldnt give a sh it.... hes not good enough |
One thing to note: I've never seen a player intercept so many balls into the box from wide. He's always in the right position. An underrated skill. |  | | |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 21:35 - Aug 22 with 209 views | pointofblue |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 21:27 - Aug 22 by ArnieM |
Quite agree with you. Overrated as a centre back in my view ( Mckenna clearly doesn't crate him because he rarely plays him and hit in O'Shea). But Woolfenden is put on a pedestal primarily because hes come through the academy. He's "easy on the eye", but lacks so much as a centre back
(heading ability, physical presence in the box, commanding his opponent in the box, tackling, pace). He " walks" the ball out of defence and generally passed it to hus right 2 meters so our build up from defence is so slow.
Cue the down votes, couldnt give a sh it.... hes not good enough |
He's "put on a pedestal" because he's been a good player for us who has rarely let us down under McKenna. It's all personal opinion of course but, for me, some haven't got over his performances under Lambert, which I get as he certainly had some issues. But I think he's developed under McKenna and hopefully he'll continue to grow and make his mark presumably elsewhere. | |
| |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 21:49 - Aug 22 with 165 views | chantryblueboy |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 21:27 - Aug 22 by ArnieM |
Quite agree with you. Overrated as a centre back in my view ( Mckenna clearly doesn't crate him because he rarely plays him and hit in O'Shea). But Woolfenden is put on a pedestal primarily because hes come through the academy. He's "easy on the eye", but lacks so much as a centre back
(heading ability, physical presence in the box, commanding his opponent in the box, tackling, pace). He " walks" the ball out of defence and generally passed it to hus right 2 meters so our build up from defence is so slow.
Cue the down votes, couldnt give a sh it.... hes not good enough |
Everyone knows you don’t rate him, do the board a favour and stop fcking going on about it. So boring | | | |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 22:38 - Aug 22 with 19 views | Vic |
| If we sign Caceras and Wolfie goes on 21:49 - Aug 22 by chantryblueboy |
Everyone knows you don’t rate him, do the board a favour and stop fcking going on about it. So boring |
Poor old Arnie doesnt seem to like anything to do with the club nowadays! | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
