| Chris Wilder 19:57 - Sep 14 with 2892 views | ITFCMonk |
Am I right in thinking he could potentially be on a double wage if his previous contract was paid out? Or do some sackings not cost money? |  |
| |  |
| Apparently they are just.... on 19:58 - Sep 14 with 2867 views | Bloots |
....reinstating him back on his previous contract. |  |
| "Trite Sixth-Form Politics” - TWTD User (Sept 2025) |
| |
| Chris Wilder on 20:00 - Sep 14 with 2846 views | BlueandTruesince82 |
My guess would be that he wasn't paid all at once and they are still paying him (as we were woth Lambert). I assume that there will be a clause in the contract that means if he takes another role Sheff U no longer have to pay him or pay a reduced amount and i would imagine that will then get wrapped into his new contract or, clause depending him returning is seen as a new managerial role and they will just negotiate a new contract but if I was Wilder id be playing hardball |  |
| |
| Chris Wilder on 20:05 - Sep 14 with 2798 views | PhilTWTD |
| Chris Wilder on 20:00 - Sep 14 by BlueandTruesince82 |
My guess would be that he wasn't paid all at once and they are still paying him (as we were woth Lambert). I assume that there will be a clause in the contract that means if he takes another role Sheff U no longer have to pay him or pay a reduced amount and i would imagine that will then get wrapped into his new contract or, clause depending him returning is seen as a new managerial role and they will just negotiate a new contract but if I was Wilder id be playing hardball |
I would guess they hadn't had time to agree a settlement of his contract or he wasn't interested in doing so as he assumed he'd get another job soon enough, at which point they'd stop paying him.
I very much doubt Lambert continued to be paid for too long after he left, these deals usually have cut-off clauses after sackings. |  | | |
| Chris Wilder on 20:16 - Sep 14 with 2652 views | Vic |
| Chris Wilder on 20:05 - Sep 14 by PhilTWTD |
I would guess they hadn't had time to agree a settlement of his contract or he wasn't interested in doing so as he assumed he'd get another job soon enough, at which point they'd stop paying him.
I very much doubt Lambert continued to be paid for too long after he left, these deals usually have cut-off clauses after sackings. |
You mean you don’t think we’re we’re paying him until a few months ago? You’ve just spoilt a lovely urban myth. |  |
| |
| Chris Wilder on 20:36 - Sep 14 with 2499 views | BlueandTruesince82 |
| Chris Wilder on 20:16 - Sep 14 by Vic |
You mean you don’t think we’re we’re paying him until a few months ago? You’ve just spoilt a lovely urban myth. |
This. I thought we paid Lambert the full 4 years? Phil are you saying thats not the case? How long dod we pay him for? | |
| |
| Chris Wilder on 20:37 - Sep 14 with 2485 views | PhilTWTD |
| Chris Wilder on 20:36 - Sep 14 by BlueandTruesince82 |
This. I thought we paid Lambert the full 4 years? Phil are you saying thats not the case? How long dod we pay him for? |
Of course, I don't think I've ever heard anyone seriously suggest that was the case. | | | |
| Chris Wilder on 20:43 - Sep 14 with 2433 views | olimar |
| Chris Wilder on 20:37 - Sep 14 by PhilTWTD |
Of course, I don't think I've ever heard anyone seriously suggest that was the case. |
Always remember the fuss when Magilton went to QPR, seemingly people at ITFC were delighted as it meant we stopped paying him.
If its dependent on not getting any other form of employment, I imagine a settlement is pretty much a given quite early on. |  | | |
| Chris Wilder on 20:51 - Sep 14 with 2369 views | PhilTWTD |
| Chris Wilder on 20:43 - Sep 14 by olimar |
Always remember the fuss when Magilton went to QPR, seemingly people at ITFC were delighted as it meant we stopped paying him.
If its dependent on not getting any other form of employment, I imagine a settlement is pretty much a given quite early on. |
Often that's the case. Or there are break clauses at various stages. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Chris Wilder on 22:36 - Sep 14 with 1945 views | SitfcB |
| Chris Wilder on 20:37 - Sep 14 by PhilTWTD |
Of course, I don't think I've ever heard anyone seriously suggest that was the case. |
He said himself he was, not publicly mind. [Post edited 14 Sep 22:36]
|  |
| |
| Chris Wilder on 05:49 - Sep 15 with 1295 views | franz_tyson |
Don't get this.
Right from the get go, there'd be tension and friction ... and very recent history .. between the owners and Wilder.
So he's crap a few months ago.... and yet now he's the only man in the profession who can do this job now. | | | |
| Chris Wilder on 09:53 - Sep 15 with 710 views | BlueDouglas |
| Chris Wilder on 05:49 - Sep 15 by franz_tyson |
Don't get this.
Right from the get go, there'd be tension and friction ... and very recent history .. between the owners and Wilder.
So he's crap a few months ago.... and yet now he's the only man in the profession who can do this job now. |
Is it a case of they need a manager to keep them from being relegated to league 1? If so Wilder makes sense, especially if Selles has lost the dressing room.
Seems like they need Wilder more than he needs them atm |  | | |
| Chris Wilder on 10:19 - Sep 15 with 626 views | Guthrum |
| Chris Wilder on 09:53 - Sep 15 by BlueDouglas |
Is it a case of they need a manager to keep them from being relegated to league 1? If so Wilder makes sense, especially if Selles has lost the dressing room.
Seems like they need Wilder more than he needs them atm |
Indeed, some managers have almost made a career out of their reputation for saving teams from relegation. |  |
| |
| Chris Wilder on 10:48 - Sep 15 with 522 views | PrideOfTheEast |
| Chris Wilder on 22:36 - Sep 14 by SitfcB |
He said himself he was, not publicly mind. [Post edited 14 Sep 22:36]
|
Would be the type of thing Ashton would be calling out as slating the past wouldn't it?! | | | |
| Chris Wilder on 12:55 - Sep 15 with 254 views | Guthrum |
| Chris Wilder on 10:48 - Sep 15 by PrideOfTheEast |
Would be the type of thing Ashton would be calling out as slating the past wouldn't it?! |
Probably not as pertaining to an individual's contract? Confidentiality and all that. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
