| Hackney tackle ... Not a red?! on 01:50 - Dec 27 with 1418 views | FoghornGleghorn |
Did he just literally hack knee? |  | |  |
| Hackney tackle ... Not a red?! on 07:38 - Dec 27 with 1174 views | football |
Absolutely zero desire to get the ball, then a petulant throw the hands in the air and walk off | | | |
| Hackney tackle ... Not a red?! on 08:02 - Dec 27 with 1096 views | ITFC_Forever |
Hardly touched him to be fair. |  |
| |
| Hackney tackle ... Not a red?! on 08:06 - Dec 27 with 1078 views | Mullet |
Only thing will be if it's reviewed after somehow but I don't think it can be can it? Ref saw it and made a decision.
They got away with that one, I'm not sure it will be too pivotal over the whole season though. |  |
| |
| Hackney tackle ... Not a red?! on 08:08 - Dec 27 with 1061 views | Dubtractor |
Re Hackney, it's a shame that Wolves are so hopelessly nailed on for relegation, as you'd imagine that Edwards would have gone back for him but that won't be an especially tempting move as it stands! |  |
| |
| Hackney tackle ... Not a red?! on 08:12 - Dec 27 with 1030 views | Wickets |
| Hackney tackle ... Not a red?! on 01:50 - Dec 27 by FoghornGleghorn |
Did he just literally hack knee? |
A cracking tackle , how on earth . |  | | |
| Hackney tackle ... Not a red?! on 08:30 - Dec 27 with 943 views | PrideOfTheEast |
Obviously a red.
He’s got the same punishment as Jaden got for bouncing the ball yesterday ffs! | | | |
| Hackney tackle ... Not a red?! on 09:17 - Dec 27 with 731 views | EastTownBlue |
| Hackney tackle ... Not a red?! on 08:06 - Dec 27 by Mullet |
Only thing will be if it's reviewed after somehow but I don't think it can be can it? Ref saw it and made a decision.
They got away with that one, I'm not sure it will be too pivotal over the whole season though. |
Ref saw it and gave a yellow card so that is it. If he didn't see it the FA could have issued a violent conduct charge. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Hackney tackle ... Not a red?! on 09:27 - Dec 27 with 684 views | cbower |
Terrible decision, poor refereeing. We move on. |  |
| |
| Hackney tackle ... Not a red?! on 12:24 - Dec 27 with 425 views | GeoffSentence |
| Hackney tackle ... Not a red?! on 08:08 - Dec 27 by Dubtractor |
Re Hackney, it's a shame that Wolves are so hopelessly nailed on for relegation, as you'd imagine that Edwards would have gone back for him but that won't be an especially tempting move as it stands! |
The reason he didn't sign for us even though he'd been down at the training ground was because Wolves and Fulham made late approaches for him and he wanted to play in the prem. They ran out of time to get a deal done in the summer window.
As you say, Wolves don't look like such a good bet now. Assuming they are still interested I would not be at all surprised to see him move to Craven Cottage. |  |
| |
| Hackney tackle ... Not a red?! on 13:11 - Dec 27 with 327 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
I would imagine he is lucky the ref saw it from that angle and it must have looked far less of a red from his. Clear red from that footage.
If we sign him in the window (it won't happen I know), it would be about right that this is then reviewed and he gets a lengthy ban! |  |
| |
| Hackney tackle ... Not a red?! on 16:03 - Dec 27 with 117 views | ronnyd |
| Hackney tackle ... Not a red?! on 13:11 - Dec 27 by Nthsuffolkblue |
I would imagine he is lucky the ref saw it from that angle and it must have looked far less of a red from his. Clear red from that footage.
If we sign him in the window (it won't happen I know), it would be about right that this is then reviewed and he gets a lengthy ban! |
That looks bad from any angle. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
