| Bristol City Fans 13:23 - Jan 23 with 3333 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
seem more than happy with £3m, a lot seemed to have been expecting £1.5m
Quote: "£3m is an amazing fee for January" |  |
| |  |
| Bristol City Fans on 07:00 - Jan 24 with 118 views | PioneerBlue |
If he can make a similar contribution to his current form over remaining game the payback will be huge! |  |
| |
| Bristol City Fans on 07:16 - Jan 24 with 82 views | Churchman |
| Bristol City Fans on 14:18 - Jan 23 by ElderGrizzly |
Didn't Wrexham pay £7m+ for Broadhead with just 1 year left.
This feels on par with that. |
I think you are right EG.
I find it hard to get my head around changing values for players. I guess the influx of money from new owners in addition to Premier League is ripping up what is expensive, cheap, about right.
But in the current climate, £3m feels decent for both clubs. I’ve only seen him on tv (unless he played in the home game two years ago) but he looks a neat and tidy player. Good age too. |  | | |
| Bristol City Fans on 07:45 - Jan 24 with 45 views | Blue23 |
| Bristol City Fans on 13:41 - Jan 23 by Zx1988 |
The happiness with £3m now versus a free in the summer probably overlooks the actual cost of a 'free' signing as well.
If he was out of contract, he'd certainly be expecting a good chunk of that fee to end up in his/his agent's pocket instead. [Post edited 23 Jan 13:42]
|
ZX1988 absolutely spot on. Free transfers are never ‘free’. They come with huge signing on fees and big wages. I know it’s a totally different level but the figures mooted around the most recent famous one in Mbappe to Real Madrid suggests a signing on fee on either £85 mill of 150 mill euros! And, that’s on top of the £300k a week wages.
Translate that down to our level and even if we got him in the summer, he still wouldn’t be ‘free’. Pardon the pun but I think the price is right :) | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
