| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? 16:59 - Mar 13 with 1636 views | Roburmsyenna |
however slight, he did what he did, has admitted it and I guess the ban is normal and what is expected for the offence. Yes ot stinks, looks harsh and their player clearly over reacted l, but he's admitted it end of. |  |
| |  |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:06 - Mar 13 with 1573 views | SitfcB |
I don’t think he’s admitted to any hair pull though, just the push.
He wasn’t happy with the length of the ban, for a hair pull 3 games is correct.
The 3 games for the push does seem excessive and must be why he’s unhappy and why Ashton is incensed. |  |
| |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:08 - Mar 13 with 1541 views | pingu67 |
If your gonna get a 3 game ban, at least punch the guy hard.
Leave them rolling around in pain |  | | |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:09 - Mar 13 with 1533 views | Roburmsyenna |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:06 - Mar 13 by SitfcB |
I don’t think he’s admitted to any hair pull though, just the push.
He wasn’t happy with the length of the ban, for a hair pull 3 games is correct.
The 3 games for the push does seem excessive and must be why he’s unhappy and why Ashton is incensed. |
that would certainly make more sense | |
| |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:11 - Mar 13 with 1522 views | SitfcB |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:09 - Mar 13 by Roburmsyenna |
that would certainly make more sense |
Sky saying it’s a stamp?
| |
| |
| Ah, fair enough on 17:12 - Mar 13 with 1495 views | Dyland |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:06 - Mar 13 by SitfcB |
I don’t think he’s admitted to any hair pull though, just the push.
He wasn’t happy with the length of the ban, for a hair pull 3 games is correct.
The 3 games for the push does seem excessive and must be why he’s unhappy and why Ashton is incensed. |
I assumed he must have admitted it because the footage is totally inconclusive. Unreal if this is true. |  |
| |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:13 - Mar 13 with 1488 views | PhilTWTD |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:06 - Mar 13 by SitfcB |
I don’t think he’s admitted to any hair pull though, just the push.
He wasn’t happy with the length of the ban, for a hair pull 3 games is correct.
The 3 games for the push does seem excessive and must be why he’s unhappy and why Ashton is incensed. |
I was told the hair pull was the issue. |  | | |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:14 - Mar 13 with 1485 views | Swansea_Blue |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:11 - Mar 13 by SitfcB |
Sky saying it’s a stamp?
|
Feck it, I’ll have to go and watch it again on a big screen now. I didn’t notice a stamp watching on my phone. |  |
| |
| Farcical stuff on 17:15 - Mar 13 with 1474 views | Dyland |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:13 - Mar 13 by PhilTWTD |
I was told the hair pull was the issue. |
Promotion push potentially derailed by argument over hair pull.
Arf! | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:19 - Mar 13 with 1439 views | SitfcB |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:13 - Mar 13 by PhilTWTD |
I was told the hair pull was the issue. |
Seems strange they’d argue the case then as that’s a 3 game ban every time.
Would Davis have just been advised to accept it as denying it could’ve made it worse? | |
| |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:20 - Mar 13 with 1432 views | jas0999 |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:06 - Mar 13 by SitfcB |
I don’t think he’s admitted to any hair pull though, just the push.
He wasn’t happy with the length of the ban, for a hair pull 3 games is correct.
The 3 games for the push does seem excessive and must be why he’s unhappy and why Ashton is incensed. |
He admitted the charge didn’t he? The charge was a push and hair pulling. Presumably this was all captured on camera anyway … so can’t really see what we are complaining about. | | | |
| Farcical stuff on 17:26 - Mar 13 with 1390 views | PhilTWTD |
| Farcical stuff on 17:15 - Mar 13 by Dyland |
Promotion push potentially derailed by argument over hair pull.
Arf! |
It is a bit bizarre that refereeing is suddenly playing such a significant part in our season. | | | |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:28 - Mar 13 with 1368 views | PhilTWTD |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:19 - Mar 13 by SitfcB |
Seems strange they’d argue the case then as that’s a 3 game ban every time.
Would Davis have just been advised to accept it as denying it could’ve made it worse? |
I'm surprised the other player hasn't been charged for his part in the incident as he clearly kicks out. Will be interesting to read the written reasons when they're released. | | | |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:28 - Mar 13 with 1363 views | Exiled2Surrey |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:13 - Mar 13 by PhilTWTD |
I was told the hair pull was the issue. |
The resulting action suggests that has to be the reason for the decision - nothing to do with the petulant antics thereafter
From the video evidence we have all seen it does look like his head is pulled back as he falls initially - but it is far from "beyond all reasonable doubt" on the video we have seen
But also from the footage it looks like Leif is just looking at the flight of the ball and there is an argument that he had no idea what he was getting hold of as he was looking to hand off the player - it could easily have been simulation, although those in the USBR suggest otherwise.
I can only think that the club were advised to fess up to ease the process and there was sufficient uncertainty in the footage and lack of intent from Davis that this would be mitigation in reducing the scale of punishment.
Which is why Ashton is now going off on one - and I think with some cause | | | |
| Still better than VAR on 17:28 - Mar 13 with 1349 views | Dyland |
| Farcical stuff on 17:26 - Mar 13 by PhilTWTD |
It is a bit bizarre that refereeing is suddenly playing such a significant part in our season. |
:) | |
| |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:37 - Mar 13 with 1256 views | norfsufblue |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:28 - Mar 13 by Exiled2Surrey |
The resulting action suggests that has to be the reason for the decision - nothing to do with the petulant antics thereafter
From the video evidence we have all seen it does look like his head is pulled back as he falls initially - but it is far from "beyond all reasonable doubt" on the video we have seen
But also from the footage it looks like Leif is just looking at the flight of the ball and there is an argument that he had no idea what he was getting hold of as he was looking to hand off the player - it could easily have been simulation, although those in the USBR suggest otherwise.
I can only think that the club were advised to fess up to ease the process and there was sufficient uncertainty in the footage and lack of intent from Davis that this would be mitigation in reducing the scale of punishment.
Which is why Ashton is now going off on one - and I think with some cause |
If thats the result there's really no point in admitting anything anymore... could an appeal delay the ban... surely theres grounds on length of ban so its no increased? |  | | |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:46 - Mar 13 with 1206 views | Exiled2Surrey |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:37 - Mar 13 by norfsufblue |
If thats the result there's really no point in admitting anything anymore... could an appeal delay the ban... surely theres grounds on length of ban so its no increased? |
That is the natural conclusion you would have to draw - no point in entering a plea
We actually don’t want the punishment delayed though! | | | |
| Farcical stuff on 17:48 - Mar 13 with 1177 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Farcical stuff on 17:26 - Mar 13 by PhilTWTD |
It is a bit bizarre that refereeing is suddenly playing such a significant part in our season. |
When did clubs vote about play off thing and what was our vote? |  |
| |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:53 - Mar 13 with 1140 views | EastTownBlue |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:46 - Mar 13 by Exiled2Surrey |
That is the natural conclusion you would have to draw - no point in entering a plea
We actually don’t want the punishment delayed though! |
Exactly, if any match is to be served as part of a suspension… | | | |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 18:28 - Mar 13 with 988 views | Ftnfwest |
Let’s just say that for fairly obvious reasons he wasn’t going to argue it successfully |  | | |
| Farcical stuff on 18:37 - Mar 13 with 932 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Farcical stuff on 17:26 - Mar 13 by PhilTWTD |
It is a bit bizarre that refereeing is suddenly playing such a significant part in our season. |
Although with Busby entirely predictable. The bigger story should be that he didn’t cock up at Bristol away. | |
| |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 18:48 - Mar 13 with 885 views | Swansea_Blue |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:46 - Mar 13 by Exiled2Surrey |
That is the natural conclusion you would have to draw - no point in entering a plea
We actually don’t want the punishment delayed though! |
I’m not sure you can second guess it. We’ve got Millwall and Birmingham up after Wednesday. Wall is a 6 pointer. And we’ll have Kipre (def) and Matusiwa (likely) out for that one. Boro is the biggest one, but Wall is second. | |
| |
| Farcical stuff on 18:55 - Mar 13 with 847 views | PhilTWTD |
| Farcical stuff on 17:48 - Mar 13 by FrimleyBlue |
When did clubs vote about play off thing and what was our vote? |
Last week, MA has just said Town voted in favour. | | | |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 19:07 - Mar 13 with 796 views | stonojnr |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:08 - Mar 13 by pingu67 |
If your gonna get a 3 game ban, at least punch the guy hard.
Leave them rolling around in pain |
Always remember Tony Vaughan many years back had a torrid game, think we were losing anyway, this guy he'd been marking must have been winding him up all game, and prob 80th-90th minute Tony took him out towards Churchmans end with the kind of tackle thesedays probably get banned for 6 games now, absolutely pole axed him Tony got up from his tackle and just carried on walking off the pitch, didnt look back, didn't wait for the ref who was huffing and puffing running after him to show him a red card, just went yeah I knew what I was doing. Now thats the way to take a red card. LOL
Don't think Burley was impressed though | | | |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 19:59 - Mar 13 with 570 views | Illinoisblue |
| If Davis admitted the charge then there's not much wrong is there? on 17:06 - Mar 13 by SitfcB |
I don’t think he’s admitted to any hair pull though, just the push.
He wasn’t happy with the length of the ban, for a hair pull 3 games is correct.
The 3 games for the push does seem excessive and must be why he’s unhappy and why Ashton is incensed. |
Seen Leicester fans calling it a shove, Sky say a stamp, others a hair pull…. And the video/s confirm none of that |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
