| Zak Sturge on 18:09 - Mar 18 with 1722 views | MattinLondon |
To be fair it was a ridiculous decision to send him off. |  | |  |
| Zak Sturge on 18:14 - Mar 18 with 1658 views | Nutkins_Return |
| Zak Sturge on 18:09 - Mar 18 by MattinLondon |
To be fair it was a ridiculous decision to send him off. |
Can we have Leif back? |  |
| |
| Zak Sturge on 18:15 - Mar 18 with 1644 views | cbower |
No worries. Whilst down to 10 men they conceded twice and lost the game. Job done. |  |
| |
| Zak Sturge on 18:37 - Mar 18 with 1457 views | Guthrum |
So he can get sent off again on Saturday. |  |
| |
| Zak Sturge on 19:57 - Mar 18 with 1094 views | Exiled2Surrey |
It would be completely reasonable for them to replay the game - perhaps reschedule it for this weekend and postpone our match so we end up with a four game week… | | | |
| Zak Sturge on 20:20 - Mar 18 with 1005 views | Garv |
| Zak Sturge on 18:09 - Mar 18 by MattinLondon |
To be fair it was a ridiculous decision to send him off. |
Am I the only one that thinks it was totally justified?
Borderline, and if the referee decided not to send him off then fair enough, but the striker is going through on goal.
One of those where a still photo of the tackle doesn't reflect the situation accurately, you have to watch it in real time. He's 100% about to have a goal scoring opportunity. |  |
| |
| Zak Sturge on 22:00 - Mar 18 with 837 views | jayessess |
| Zak Sturge on 20:20 - Mar 18 by Garv |
Am I the only one that thinks it was totally justified?
Borderline, and if the referee decided not to send him off then fair enough, but the striker is going through on goal.
One of those where a still photo of the tackle doesn't reflect the situation accurately, you have to watch it in real time. He's 100% about to have a goal scoring opportunity. |
I'm amazed it's been overturned. Not because it was an unquestionable decision particularly, but just because the ref's had a clear view of it and made a plausible-enough judgement of it. Usually there's a pretty high bar for actually overturning things that the ref has actually seen at the time and I'm not sure how this meets it? |  |
| |
| Zak Sturge on 10:59 - Mar 19 with 456 views | Basuco |
It was a very harsh straight red card and no surprise that it was rescinded, Femi Azeez looks a real handful, two footed and great close control, shame he could not be persuaded to join us in January. It would have been handy to have Leif at left back to defend against him, they are all about pace on the counter so we need to be careful about how we push forward on Saturday, I am really looking forward to the game, although it will probably be another low block 10 man defence while hoping to hit us on the break sort of game. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Zak Sturge on 12:58 - Mar 19 with 290 views | MattinLondon |
| Zak Sturge on 22:00 - Mar 18 by jayessess |
I'm amazed it's been overturned. Not because it was an unquestionable decision particularly, but just because the ref's had a clear view of it and made a plausible-enough judgement of it. Usually there's a pretty high bar for actually overturning things that the ref has actually seen at the time and I'm not sure how this meets it? |
Maybe the ref was big enough to admit that he made a mistake. | | | |
| Zak Sturge on 13:24 - Mar 19 with 235 views | Herbivore |
If that was us we'd have got another game ban for a frivolous appeal. |  |
| |
| Zak Sturge on 13:32 - Mar 19 with 201 views | Exiled2Surrey |
| Zak Sturge on 10:59 - Mar 19 by Basuco |
It was a very harsh straight red card and no surprise that it was rescinded, Femi Azeez looks a real handful, two footed and great close control, shame he could not be persuaded to join us in January. It would have been handy to have Leif at left back to defend against him, they are all about pace on the counter so we need to be careful about how we push forward on Saturday, I am really looking forward to the game, although it will probably be another low block 10 man defence while hoping to hit us on the break sort of game. |
Is BJ really a worse defender than Leif? He is clearly not a patch on LD going forwards, but I wonder whether we might be OK in this particular case defending their biggest threat | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
