| What was that second half all about? 14:27 - Mar 21 with 2228 views | Mullet |
Almost like the first goal sapped our confidence not built it after half time. Millwall will love that result comparatively won’t they? Ended up a fair result after we should have been comfortable, can’t believe we struggled to deal with 442 stop the boats/press football. Is McKenna just not versed in that sort of thing? Seems hard to believe to me.
I thought Johnson played well again, Jaden looks unfit and most of the subs didn’t improve us or even keep us at the same level. Another game full of what ifs and each keeper will point to great things they did today.
Frustrating to say the least. |  |
| |  |
| What was that second half all about? on 15:49 - Mar 21 with 501 views | Mullet |
| What was that second half all about? on 15:34 - Mar 21 by pointofblue |
Only had the live look at it, but I'd blame Akpom as much as Taylor, if not more, for the breakaway. He seemed to run away from the ball, even when it was obvious he needed to go to it. |
Nah, he was breaking in behind the defenders and Taylor should have seen the right wing was completely open anyway! If Akpom goes to him they are stood on top of each other! | |
| |
| What was that second half all about? on 16:11 - Mar 21 with 457 views | ernie |
| What was that second half all about? on 15:19 - Mar 21 by Nutkins_Return |
I would honestly have rather have seen Cajuste come on. They were bringing on Bannon which would give them more control and we went with Taylor who would give us less. He's not good enough on the ball as much as I like his character. Good drive through the middle summed him up unfortunately with the quality lacking at the end which gave them a really dangerous transition.
It was a foul for their goal. But if anything it was well played by their lad as he disguised it well and you rarely get those ones. A clear shove on Furlong on the replay and absolutely not just a shoulder to shoulder. But it wasn't an easy one for the ref in real time. |
Don’t be daft. Cajuste offers nothing. You could see by his face at the end that he knows he’s on his way soon. |  | | |
| What was that second half all about? on 16:51 - Mar 21 with 425 views | LankHenners |
Subs didn't work as every one that came on was worse than the player they replaced (for Jaden - not as effective on the left as Clarke) but the players in general just didn't deal with Millwall getting in our faces 2nd half. Wouldn't say it's on McKenna really - we can't get out down the right very easily when teams do that as O'Shea and Furlong are too slow/crap (first of those for the former, both for the latter) on the ball and, as well as Johnson played, not having the outlet of Leif bombing into space hinders us on the other side.
Left us needing to be much stronger in the duels than we were and better with the ball when we did break with it than we were. |  |
| |
| What was that second half all about? on 17:07 - Mar 21 with 389 views | Nutkins_Return |
| What was that second half all about? on 16:11 - Mar 21 by ernie |
Don’t be daft. Cajuste offers nothing. You could see by his face at the end that he knows he’s on his way soon. |
Oh well if you can see by his face that he's on his way soon I stand corrected.
That's absolute gold. | |
| |
| What was that second half all about? on 17:14 - Mar 21 with 373 views | TRUE_BLUE123 |
| What was that second half all about? on 14:33 - Mar 21 by BouncebackIpswich |
Poor subs from McKenna, needs to be more reactive in games as Clarke had Kramma on toast and there was no need to change it. Put Jaden on the right if he had to come on. He's too robotic and process driven at times for me |
"Too process driven"
Whatever that means. |  |
| |
| What was that second half all about? on 17:20 - Mar 21 with 352 views | ITFCSG |
| What was that second half all about? on 14:58 - Mar 21 by franz_tyson |
Those breaks.. 3 on 3, 4 on 4 or maybe having an extra man. Final ball always took the wrong option or the final ball was underweight or misplaced. So frustrating.
Millwall defended very well and put bodies on the line and the best bit of quality in the game was the cross for their goal.
The effort was there. Just needed that extra bit of quality. |
Thats the result of not signing a clinical forward after so many windows. If we had McBurnie, Vitponik, Gelhardt, Piroe, Windass or even K.Moore up front instead of Hirst and Azon we would have buried them | | | |
| What was that second half all about? on 18:03 - Mar 21 with 303 views | BouncebackIpswich |
| What was that second half all about? on 17:14 - Mar 21 by TRUE_BLUE123 |
"Too process driven"
Whatever that means. |
Process-driven is a compound adjective describing an approach, organization, or person that prioritizes structured procedures, standardized workflows, and step-by-step methodologies over individual intuition, ad-hoc decisions, or immediate, short-term results
Hope that helps
It is both his strength and weakness at times |  |
| |
| What was that second half all about? on 18:04 - Mar 21 with 304 views | StNeotsBlue |
| What was that second half all about? on 15:19 - Mar 21 by Nutkins_Return |
I would honestly have rather have seen Cajuste come on. They were bringing on Bannon which would give them more control and we went with Taylor who would give us less. He's not good enough on the ball as much as I like his character. Good drive through the middle summed him up unfortunately with the quality lacking at the end which gave them a really dangerous transition.
It was a foul for their goal. But if anything it was well played by their lad as he disguised it well and you rarely get those ones. A clear shove on Furlong on the replay and absolutely not just a shoulder to shoulder. But it wasn't an easy one for the ref in real time. |
It was never a foul, their guy was either stronger or Furlong was trying to win a foul rather than the ball. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| What was that second half all about? on 18:20 - Mar 21 with 262 views | mellowblue |
| What was that second half all about? on 18:04 - Mar 21 by StNeotsBlue |
It was never a foul, their guy was either stronger or Furlong was trying to win a foul rather than the ball. |
Agree, thought their guy was stronger and turned him. Looked fair to me. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
