| The unnamed celebrity scandal 23:37 - Nov 3 with 2647 views | The_Romford_Blue |
Obviously everyone knows and has known for months who it is. I’d actually heard from my man in the media about it in December 2025. It goes without saying… don’t name him as it lands Phil and the site in trouble.
What was interesting about today’s case going against him (subject to appeal) is that it’s now public knowledge he tried to kill himself twice in 2026 regarding the story being on the brink of publicity. The Telegraph first reporting their separate (yet similar story) at the end of last year wa obviously the start of it all crumbling.
Fascinating viewing. My question for TWTD and the reason for the thread is now it is established that he did actually try to kill himself twice over this and so it’s not an empty threat is the correct thing morally:
A) he stays anonymous. And the two very high level investigations from the two media teams involved take the case to the police. And only once he’s charged is he named.
B) the story of the 10+ victims is told as they wished and the media are allowed to publish what they’ve found through investigatitive journalism that first began over 2 years ago now to get to the bottom of the story. But runs the risk of him committing suicide.
What is the moral rightful outcome here?
Finally once again it’s genuinely something I’m interested in the forums opinion on and so please don’t be a t*t and get the thread pulled by naming him or subtly hinting at the person. We all know who it is - zero need to start making stupid jokes and run the risk of it being deleted before an interesting discussion can take place.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/art |  |
| |  |
| Assume that’s sarcasm?? (n/t) on 10:53 - Nov 4 with 268 views | Bloots |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 09:40 - Nov 4 by MattinLondon |
Agreed - surprised at who posted it. |
|  |
| Keaton, Kint, McManus, Fenster and Hockney. |
| |
| Assume that’s sarcasm?? (n/t) on 11:02 - Nov 4 with 206 views | MattinLondon |
| Assume that’s sarcasm?? (n/t) on 10:53 - Nov 4 by Bloots |
|
No, not at all - I’ve always thought that Flash was quite decent. Simply thought that his comment on this thread was awful. |  | | |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:16 - Nov 4 with 169 views | Meadowlark |
I have no idea who or what you're talking about. This is the first I've heard of it.
(But I'm a little out of touch with celebrity stuff TBH) |  | | |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:19 - Nov 4 with 163 views | ITFC_Essex |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 07:33 - Nov 4 by Keno |
^^^THIS^^^
and I dont know who it is |
Computer says no....Famous for a TV show that rhymes with "Brittle Mitten"
Painfully obvious BBC perv and weirdo outed as a painfully obvious perv and weirdo. |  |
| |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:21 - Nov 4 with 158 views | vapour_trail |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:19 - Nov 4 by ITFC_Essex |
Computer says no....Famous for a TV show that rhymes with "Brittle Mitten"
Painfully obvious BBC perv and weirdo outed as a painfully obvious perv and weirdo. |
And here, the thread does endeth. |  |
| |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:23 - Nov 4 with 154 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:19 - Nov 4 by ITFC_Essex |
Computer says no....Famous for a TV show that rhymes with "Brittle Mitten"
Painfully obvious BBC perv and weirdo outed as a painfully obvious perv and weirdo. |
As if by magic..."so please don’t be a t*t and get the thread pulled by naming him or subtly hinting at the person" |  |
| |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:24 - Nov 4 with 147 views | MattinLondon |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:19 - Nov 4 by ITFC_Essex |
Computer says no....Famous for a TV show that rhymes with "Brittle Mitten"
Painfully obvious BBC perv and weirdo outed as a painfully obvious perv and weirdo. |
Well done for ruining a thread. | | | |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:25 - Nov 4 with 145 views | ITFC_Essex |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:23 - Nov 4 by Cheltenham_Blue |
As if by magic..."so please don’t be a t*t and get the thread pulled by naming him or subtly hinting at the person" |
It's going to be mainline news imminently anyway. It's all over the place already, Saville-type stuff and cover ups. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:25 - Nov 4 with 136 views | Blueschev |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:23 - Nov 4 by Cheltenham_Blue |
As if by magic..."so please don’t be a t*t and get the thread pulled by naming him or subtly hinting at the person" |
To be fair, they didn't name him. And they certainly didn't subtly hint! |  | | |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:26 - Nov 4 with 129 views | ITFC_Essex |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:24 - Nov 4 by MattinLondon |
Well done for ruining a thread. |
No problem, happy to help.
He's filth, he deserves everything coming his way. | |
| |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:27 - Nov 4 with 124 views | DropCliffsNotBombs |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:25 - Nov 4 by ITFC_Essex |
It's going to be mainline news imminently anyway. It's all over the place already, Saville-type stuff and cover ups. |
Just edit your previous post, it's not that hard man |  | | |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:28 - Nov 4 with 107 views | DropCliffsNotBombs |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 08:20 - Nov 4 by The_Flashing_Smile |
You've demonstrated the problem right here - clearly see them as guilty despite not even knowing who they are, let alone anything about the case.
If people have been abused by a celeb and know that a celeb is being investigated... then you'd think they'd look into it and find out if it's the celeb who abused them, before then having the confidence to come forward knowing others already have. It's very easy to find out who it is.
The wider public, who haven't been abused, don't need to know... until this person has been proven guilty by a court of law. Everyone deserves a fair trial, not trial by media just because they're in the public eye. |
Gonna assume this is just REALLY poorly worded, rather than deliberately such a rancid post. | | | |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:30 - Nov 4 with 89 views | MattinLondon |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:25 - Nov 4 by ITFC_Essex |
It's going to be mainline news imminently anyway. It's all over the place already, Saville-type stuff and cover ups. |
Yeah I’m sure that ‘it’s going to be news soon’ argument will satisfy any lawyers that may knock on Phil’s door. | | | |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:34 - Nov 4 with 68 views | _CliveBaker_ |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:26 - Nov 4 by ITFC_Essex |
No problem, happy to help.
He's filth, he deserves everything coming his way. |
I think you've missed the point.
Its not fair on Phil, delete it. |  | | |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:34 - Nov 4 with 68 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:26 - Nov 4 by ITFC_Essex |
No problem, happy to help.
He's filth, he deserves everything coming his way. |
Not sure that having a thread on TWTD pulled will bother him TBH. | |
| |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:42 - Nov 4 with 39 views | MattinLondon |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:34 - Nov 4 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Not sure that having a thread on TWTD pulled will bother him TBH. |
But it’ll bother Phil if any lawyers are made aware of it. | | | |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:44 - Nov 4 with 21 views | nrb1985 |
I don’t know what the answer is but he’d be far better off coming out and owning it and trying to clear his name at this point.
Optically it looks awful for him, like he’s trying to cheat the system. |  | | |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:48 - Nov 4 with 0 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| The unnamed celebrity scandal on 11:42 - Nov 4 by MattinLondon |
But it’ll bother Phil if any lawyers are made aware of it. |
I wasn't talking about that. I was talking about Essex saying "No problem, he deserves everything he gets'', in response to getting a thread pulled. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
