| McGuiness looks good 20:08 - Oct 27 with 1537 views | nodge_blue |
Does the defending well but also he's very comfortable on the ball, drops quickly and naturally into position as well to receive it. Think he'll stay in this side for quite a while.
Wolf done well too.
Only complaint is lack of goals. |  |
| |  |
| McGuiness looks good on 20:43 - Oct 27 with 1440 views | WicklowBlue |
Same old same old, can't hit a barn door with a banjo  |  | | |
| McGuiness looks good on 20:45 - Oct 27 with 1407 views | jeera |
If nothing else tonight has provided a chance for those 2 to work together in a competitive match then. |  |
| |
| McGuiness looks good on 20:46 - Oct 27 with 1396 views | N2_Blue |
| McGuiness looks good on 20:45 - Oct 27 by jeera |
If nothing else tonight has provided a chance for those 2 to work together in a competitive match then. |
against the most inept opposition it's fairly meaningless. Not been tested have they.. |  |
| |
| McGuiness looks good on 20:47 - Oct 27 with 1381 views | jeera |
| McGuiness looks good on 20:46 - Oct 27 by N2_Blue |
against the most inept opposition it's fairly meaningless. Not been tested have they.. |
I try to find one small...
Ooh, we've scored.
Blimey. | |
| |
| McGuiness looks good on 21:03 - Oct 27 with 1245 views | Chrisd |
He’ll grow in confidence the more he plays. |  |
| |
| McGuiness looks good on 21:03 - Oct 27 with 1236 views | clive_baker |
Yeah he does, he's old school. I like him, kind of reminds me of a young Berra. No nonsense but can also play a bit. That has to be our best back 4 IMO, please stick with it now.
We need to get Downes back ASAP into the middle alongside Teddy and Andre and then I think we've got a nice looking side.
6/10 performance for me today, not great but fortunately didn't have to be against mediocre opposition. Still, 3 points in the bag and on to the next one. |  |
| |
| McGuiness looks good on 21:06 - Oct 27 with 1195 views | IpswichKnight |
| McGuiness looks good on 21:03 - Oct 27 by clive_baker |
Yeah he does, he's old school. I like him, kind of reminds me of a young Berra. No nonsense but can also play a bit. That has to be our best back 4 IMO, please stick with it now.
We need to get Downes back ASAP into the middle alongside Teddy and Andre and then I think we've got a nice looking side.
6/10 performance for me today, not great but fortunately didn't have to be against mediocre opposition. Still, 3 points in the bag and on to the next one. |
We need a Striker, we look totally toothless up front if we can get our Strikers scoring then that team would look decent. | | | |
| McGuiness looks good on 21:10 - Oct 27 with 1161 views | clive_baker |
| McGuiness looks good on 21:06 - Oct 27 by IpswichKnight |
We need a Striker, we look totally toothless up front if we can get our Strikers scoring then that team would look decent. |
We do, the front 3 is the piece of the jigsaw that I don't think we've landed on yet, especially the central striker if we have Edwards on the left and Lankester right. Jackson's back now, and I wouldn't rule him out making a claim up there. Hawkins looks to be doing what we thought he would and is a decent option, but I cant see him scoring 20 a season. I've kind of given up on Norwood for now. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| McGuiness looks good on 21:21 - Oct 27 with 1086 views | Reusersgreasymop |
A pint of please bar keep. | | | |
| McGuiness looks good on 21:23 - Oct 27 with 1047 views | reusersfreekicks |
| McGuiness looks good on 21:10 - Oct 27 by clive_baker |
We do, the front 3 is the piece of the jigsaw that I don't think we've landed on yet, especially the central striker if we have Edwards on the left and Lankester right. Jackson's back now, and I wouldn't rule him out making a claim up there. Hawkins looks to be doing what we thought he would and is a decent option, but I cant see him scoring 20 a season. I've kind of given up on Norwood for now. |
Jackson on one of the flanks would add much needed potency. sears just doesn't make things happen. Edwards at least opened them up a few times [Post edited 27 Oct 2020 21:31]
|  | | |
| McGuiness looks good on 21:29 - Oct 27 with 993 views | IpswichKnight |
| McGuiness looks good on 21:10 - Oct 27 by clive_baker |
We do, the front 3 is the piece of the jigsaw that I don't think we've landed on yet, especially the central striker if we have Edwards on the left and Lankester right. Jackson's back now, and I wouldn't rule him out making a claim up there. Hawkins looks to be doing what we thought he would and is a decent option, but I cant see him scoring 20 a season. I've kind of given up on Norwood for now. |
Same here on Norwood, wouldn’t be surprised if we move him on in January and try to bring in a striker then. Hawkins is a clever player he keeps the ball well but he ain’t going to be scoring more than 10 a season. How we get Jackson and Hawkins into the same team is the conundrum as we don’t look like playing Jackson wide though I think he would do a decent job! | | | |
| McGuiness looks good on 21:32 - Oct 27 with 968 views | dirtyboy |
Thought Gills were very limited sat off us which was unlike the last two games.
We looked absolutely fine for the most part and caused ourselves more problems than the opposition did.
A draw or loss would have made that look terrible but a win didn’t do us wonders either and we’d have needed to bag 3 or 4 to please people. |  | | |
| McGuiness looks good on 22:20 - Oct 27 with 809 views | strikalite |
| McGuiness looks good on 21:29 - Oct 27 by IpswichKnight |
Same here on Norwood, wouldn’t be surprised if we move him on in January and try to bring in a striker then. Hawkins is a clever player he keeps the ball well but he ain’t going to be scoring more than 10 a season. How we get Jackson and Hawkins into the same team is the conundrum as we don’t look like playing Jackson wide though I think he would do a decent job! |
Not ideal but I'd still be tempted to play Lankaster right, Edwards left, and Jackson in the middle, that's a pacy front three, we don't have too many options upfront obviously, Jackson isn't the best back to goal we know that but this is a league below now and still think he could do a job, he has good movement too, that worries defenders, something we lack badly right now.. |  | | |
| McGuiness looks good on 22:23 - Oct 27 with 777 views | RonFearonsHair |
I like how he has his socks rolled down and shorts pulled up to make his legs look as long as possible. |  | | |
| McGuiness looks good on 22:31 - Oct 27 with 741 views | Zacak |
| McGuiness looks good on 21:06 - Oct 27 by IpswichKnight |
We need a Striker, we look totally toothless up front if we can get our Strikers scoring then that team would look decent. |
Yep, ideally we'd have more athletic, mobile forward to play that role.... |  | | |
| McGuiness looks good on 22:47 - Oct 27 with 674 views | NthQldITFC |
| McGuiness looks good on 22:23 - Oct 27 by RonFearonsHair |
I like how he has his socks rolled down and shorts pulled up to make his legs look as long as possible. |
Foreskin and pubes old boy, foreskin and pubes! |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
