| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) 13:32 - Nov 4 with 1156 views | itfcjoe |
|  |
| |  |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 13:33 - Nov 4 with 1153 views | hype313 |
Don't blame them, it was clumsy at best |  |
| |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 13:36 - Nov 4 with 1126 views | pointofblue |
Fear this will fail resulting in a match or two being added to the ban. |  |
| |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 13:40 - Nov 4 with 1099 views | MattinLondon |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 13:33 - Nov 4 by hype313 |
Don't blame them, it was clumsy at best |
Clumsiness doesn’t, in itself, mean that a red card will be rescinded. You could argue that a clumsy tackle is dangerous as that indicates that a player was out-of-control.
But It wasn’t a dangerous or hard tackle and so only a very incompetent organisation would uphold the original red card......three match ban it is then. |  | | |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 13:42 - Nov 4 with 1079 views | TheTrueBlue1878 |
Can't see it being overturned unfortunately.
Although I feel it should be, purely on basis Dozzell was pushed over (fouled) first. |  |
| |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 13:44 - Nov 4 with 1073 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 13:40 - Nov 4 by MattinLondon |
Clumsiness doesn’t, in itself, mean that a red card will be rescinded. You could argue that a clumsy tackle is dangerous as that indicates that a player was out-of-control.
But It wasn’t a dangerous or hard tackle and so only a very incompetent organisation would uphold the original red card......three match ban it is then. |
Are there actually any camera angles other than the ‘normal’ one in the highlights though? It looked harsh but putting bias aside its difficult to really say from the video, and if the ref is saying he went high over the ball then I don’t see any way it would get overturned without something clearly showing it really was an innocuous challenge |  |
| |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 13:48 - Nov 4 with 1047 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 13:44 - Nov 4 by C_HealyIsAPleasure |
Are there actually any camera angles other than the ‘normal’ one in the highlights though? It looked harsh but putting bias aside its difficult to really say from the video, and if the ref is saying he went high over the ball then I don’t see any way it would get overturned without something clearly showing it really was an innocuous challenge |
Indeed. When you consider Toto's red at Sheff Weds wasn't overturned, we've got no chance with this one. |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 13:54 - Nov 4 with 1011 views | LankHenners |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 13:44 - Nov 4 by C_HealyIsAPleasure |
Are there actually any camera angles other than the ‘normal’ one in the highlights though? It looked harsh but putting bias aside its difficult to really say from the video, and if the ref is saying he went high over the ball then I don’t see any way it would get overturned without something clearly showing it really was an innocuous challenge |
The only thing that angle shows is that Dozzell is obviously shoved in the back before making the tackle, but agree the angle makes it unclear other than that and the ref will just get his side of the story backed up. |  |
| |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 13:57 - Nov 4 with 995 views | Wallingford_Boy |
Pointless.
As others have said, we can't tell from the angle we've seen, the ref must have seen something.
Ban likely to be increased to 4 games. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 14:05 - Nov 4 with 955 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 13:54 - Nov 4 by LankHenners |
The only thing that angle shows is that Dozzell is obviously shoved in the back before making the tackle, but agree the angle makes it unclear other than that and the ref will just get his side of the story backed up. |
Truth is we don’t really know either, flip that camera 90 degrees and you may look at it and it may look an absolute shocker | |
| |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 14:11 - Nov 4 with 920 views | tractorboy1978 |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 14:05 - Nov 4 by C_HealyIsAPleasure |
Truth is we don’t really know either, flip that camera 90 degrees and you may look at it and it may look an absolute shocker |
I think the telling thing was none of their players even raised an eyebrow. | | | |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 14:13 - Nov 4 with 904 views | Steve_M |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 13:54 - Nov 4 by LankHenners |
The only thing that angle shows is that Dozzell is obviously shoved in the back before making the tackle, but agree the angle makes it unclear other than that and the ref will just get his side of the story backed up. |
It eon't get overturned, same as with Trotter and Stead beforehand. The push is the only thing that might help, especially as Dozzell goes over but not forward but I doubt it. |  |
| |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 14:36 - Nov 4 with 848 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| Club appealing Dozzell red card (n/t) on 14:11 - Nov 4 by tractorboy1978 |
I think the telling thing was none of their players even raised an eyebrow. |
Apart from in surprise, when the red was brandished!
That ref owes me a tenner. | |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
