Lankester forward option ? 15:31 - Jan 29 with 1055 views | stiff_talking | Given striker and club crisis is Lankester a better forward option ? Had a brief cameo under Hurst on free kicks and playing centrally and performed well I recall. |  | | |  |
Lankester forward option ? on 15:34 - Jan 29 with 1039 views | clive_baker | I think he is a forward personally. I can see him as an out and out number 9 more so than a 10 or a winger to be honest. But I think he would need to partner someone, playing off Hawkins or Norwood perhaps when fit. Not sure we have any forwards, fit or otherwise who suit the lone striker role really. |  |
|  |
Lankester forward option ? on 15:35 - Jan 29 with 1033 views | jayessess | The trouble is, the way we're currently playing the centre forward is very isolated and Lanks was really struggling to get in the game the last time we picked him. Combine those things and I think we'd be watching him barely touch the ball for 60 mintues before getting hooked for someone a bit brawnier. |  |
|  |
Lankester forward option ? on 15:53 - Jan 29 with 971 views | tractorboy1978 | We need a proper centre forward - someone with nous, can buy fouls, bully the back line, is an outlet. Without Norwood or Hawkins we have no presence at all. Hawkins may be limited but he's that focal point. [Post edited 29 Jan 2021 15:58]
|  | |  |
Lankester forward option ? on 15:58 - Jan 29 with 962 views | jayessess |
Lankester forward option ? on 15:53 - Jan 29 by tractorboy1978 | We need a proper centre forward - someone with nous, can buy fouls, bully the back line, is an outlet. Without Norwood or Hawkins we have no presence at all. Hawkins may be limited but he's that focal point. [Post edited 29 Jan 2021 15:58]
|
I don't think there's a single centre forward, certainly not one we could realistically get, that would thrive with our system and playing style. |  |
|  |
Lankester forward option ? on 16:01 - Jan 29 with 944 views | NthQldITFC |
Lankester forward option ? on 15:34 - Jan 29 by clive_baker | I think he is a forward personally. I can see him as an out and out number 9 more so than a 10 or a winger to be honest. But I think he would need to partner someone, playing off Hawkins or Norwood perhaps when fit. Not sure we have any forwards, fit or otherwise who suit the lone striker role really. |
But surely we must have, as we have played with a lone striker for a while now? How can this be? |  |
|  |
Lankester forward option ? on 16:01 - Jan 29 with 944 views | Parky | Can’t be any worse than what we have already. |  | |  |
Lankester forward option ? on 16:01 - Jan 29 with 942 views | tractorboy1978 |
Lankester forward option ? on 15:58 - Jan 29 by jayessess | I don't think there's a single centre forward, certainly not one we could realistically get, that would thrive with our system and playing style. |
I agree to a point - but there is an element of if the forward can't hold the ball you are also going to struggle to bring others into play. It's no co-incidence we look better with Norwood playing. |  | |  |
Lankester forward option ? on 16:08 - Jan 29 with 921 views | Mookamoo | He reminds me a bit of Scowcroft. Good footballer, but not prolific enough and will need a David Johnson-esque player alongside. |  | |  | Login to get fewer ads
Lankester forward option ? on 16:56 - Jan 29 with 856 views | Marshalls_Mullet | He's played No10 and No9 in as a scholar. |  |
|  |
Lankester forward option ? on 17:06 - Jan 29 with 836 views | NthQldITFC |
Lankester forward option ? on 16:08 - Jan 29 by Mookamoo | He reminds me a bit of Scowcroft. Good footballer, but not prolific enough and will need a David Johnson-esque player alongside. |
Oh for a DJ now. Not just the goals, but the smiles, the enthusiasm, the joy! |  |
|  |
Lankester forward option ? on 17:21 - Jan 29 with 815 views | BlueForYou | Yes I had often wondered this myself & also wondered if Edwards could possibly be used up there as well? Edwards can score goals, can shoot, take people on with his pace. Might be a goodnoption? Just a thought. At the moment if we saw a teamsheet with those two up front it would certainly grab my attention. Back to the horrid one up front tomorrow! |  | |  |
Lankester forward option ? on 18:15 - Jan 29 with 758 views | bluefunk | We need someone who can play with his back to goal, for all that people criticised Hawkins, he at least showed some ability to do that and bring others into play. Norwood or Jackson in that role have a go but it isn’t their natural game, particularly when the ball is in the air. Lankester would, I fear, struggle in the lone forward role and I would fear the effect on his confidence |  | |  |
Lankester forward option ? on 19:13 - Jan 29 with 724 views | ArnoldMoorhen |
Lankester forward option ? on 18:15 - Jan 29 by bluefunk | We need someone who can play with his back to goal, for all that people criticised Hawkins, he at least showed some ability to do that and bring others into play. Norwood or Jackson in that role have a go but it isn’t their natural game, particularly when the ball is in the air. Lankester would, I fear, struggle in the lone forward role and I would fear the effect on his confidence |
Toto for the target man role if nobody else available? Hell of a finish for the No Goal. |  | |  |
Lankester forward option ? on 19:54 - Jan 29 with 683 views | jayessess |
Lankester forward option ? on 18:15 - Jan 29 by bluefunk | We need someone who can play with his back to goal, for all that people criticised Hawkins, he at least showed some ability to do that and bring others into play. Norwood or Jackson in that role have a go but it isn’t their natural game, particularly when the ball is in the air. Lankester would, I fear, struggle in the lone forward role and I would fear the effect on his confidence |
What we need is to stop playing in a way that requires the centre forward to routinely play with their back to goal, surrounded by defenders, with little to no support. |  |
|  |
Lankester forward option ? on 08:11 - Jan 30 with 567 views | Paramedic | He is an option, but our forwards, sorry forward, always look isolated and bereft of any service. You could play Harry Kane there and it wouldn;t make any difference. |  |
|  |
Lankester forward option ? on 08:35 - Jan 30 with 539 views | CornishMariner |
Lankester forward option ? on 19:13 - Jan 29 by ArnoldMoorhen | Toto for the target man role if nobody else available? Hell of a finish for the No Goal. |
Imagine if Toto WON a penalty whilst playing centre forward. |  |
|  |
| |