| Since Evans publicly backed Lambert 17:18 - Jan 30 with 939 views | Herbivore |
Since early December when Marcus told us all there were green shoots and to be careful what we wished for, we've picked up 10 points from 8 games. In that run of games we've played at home 5 times and lost 4 of those matches, failing to score in 3 of them. We've mustered just 8 goals, despite playing sides in the bottom three on 3 occasions during those 8 games.
Where are those green shoots now, Marcus? |  |
| |  |
| Since Evans publicly backed Lambert on 17:19 - Jan 30 with 906 views | BlueBadger |
6 of those points came against the side bottom of the division as well. |  |
| |
| Since Evans publicly backed Lambert on 17:19 - Jan 30 with 907 views | StokieBlue |
That's just facts though, they aren't important.
What is important is the view he gets that we don't get on iFollow.
SB |  | | |
| Since Evans publicly backed Lambert on 17:22 - Jan 30 with 854 views | WD19 |
We took 10 points from the 8 games following the contract extension vote of confidence last year too.
We are consistent, if nothing else. |  | | |
| Since Evans publicly backed Lambert on 17:23 - Jan 30 with 828 views | Herbivore |
| Since Evans publicly backed Lambert on 17:19 - Jan 30 by BlueBadger |
6 of those points came against the side bottom of the division as well. |
Indeed, and it's a Burton side that is rock bottom and looking pretty hopeless. And we scraped two spawny one goal wins against them. Our other win was against ten man Plymouth who were on a poor run of form. The points we've picked up, which represent a meagre total in any case, have been picked up in entirely unconvincing fashion. | |
| |
| Since Evans publicly backed Lambert on 17:23 - Jan 30 with 812 views | itfcjoe |
| Since Evans publicly backed Lambert on 17:19 - Jan 30 by StokieBlue |
That's just facts though, they aren't important.
What is important is the view he gets that we don't get on iFollow.
SB |
There is no logical or rational reason for him top still be in charge |  |
| |
| Since Evans publicly backed Lambert on 17:26 - Jan 30 with 765 views | davblue |
We aren’t in the ground though. It’s so different to watching it on IFollow. |  | | |
| Since Evans publicly backed Lambert on 17:35 - Jan 30 with 680 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
| Since Evans publicly backed Lambert on 17:23 - Jan 30 by itfcjoe |
There is no logical or rational reason for him top still be in charge |
£££££ |  |
| |
| Since Evans publicly backed Lambert on 17:37 - Jan 30 with 650 views | itfcjoe |
There is also a massive cost to not paying him up, it can't just be that | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Since Evans publicly backed Lambert on 17:40 - Jan 30 with 611 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
| Since Evans publicly backed Lambert on 17:37 - Jan 30 by itfcjoe |
There is also a massive cost to not paying him up, it can't just be that |
Depends which way you look at it, if he sees changing him now as still only giving us a small chance of promotion then not really. Plus no one knows for sure the exact terms and clauses that apply
If he doesn’t go this week I can’t think of any other explanation tbh | |
| |
| Since Evans publicly backed Lambert on 17:42 - Jan 30 with 590 views | Swansea_Blue |
At least a couple of you are giving him a bit too much credit. It's 10 from 10 now.
TATD. |  |
| |
| Since Evans publicly backed Lambert on 17:43 - Jan 30 with 562 views | StokieBlue |
Is it usually this long before he speaks to the press?
SB | | | |
| Since Evans publicly backed Lambert on 17:44 - Jan 30 with 549 views | Herbivore |
| Since Evans publicly backed Lambert on 17:42 - Jan 30 by Swansea_Blue |
At least a couple of you are giving him a bit too much credit. It's 10 from 10 now.
TATD. |
I decided to go from the date on which Evans backed him, but it's rather troubling when 10 points from 8 games counts as positive spin. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
