| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? 20:55 - Feb 9 with 732 views | ElderGrizzly |
Just my opinion, but Lambert bringing Chambers back is a show of weakness.
1 game out, he can say he was giving him a rest. 2 games out, you've dropped the captain for an 18 year old loanee.
Matheson was the answer tonight, Lambert is too weak to make a stand against LC
Discuss... |  | | |  |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 20:56 - Feb 9 with 701 views | pointofblue |
Chambers returning wasn’t the issue IMO - he just replaced the wrong player. He should have been in for McGuinness rather than Matheson. |  |
| |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 20:57 - Feb 9 with 684 views | BryanPlug |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 20:56 - Feb 9 by pointofblue |
Chambers returning wasn’t the issue IMO - he just replaced the wrong player. He should have been in for McGuinness rather than Matheson. |
[content removed at owner's request] |  |
| |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 20:57 - Feb 9 with 665 views | TractorWood |
Kenlock and Matheson both dropped is absolutely unforgivable. We are so poor. 2-1 and 11 men flattered us. |  |
| |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 20:58 - Feb 9 with 627 views | gordon |
Couldn't he have just played Chambers alongside Woolfenden at centre-half, with Matheson and Kenlock at full-back? |  | | |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 20:59 - Feb 9 with 600 views | eddiespearitt03 |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 20:57 - Feb 9 by TractorWood |
Kenlock and Matheson both dropped is absolutely unforgivable. We are so poor. 2-1 and 11 men flattered us. |
Unforgivable is the word. | | | |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 20:59 - Feb 9 with 597 views | GlasgowBlue |
Completely agree. |  |
| |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 20:59 - Feb 9 with 594 views | pointofblue |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 20:57 - Feb 9 by BryanPlug |
[content removed at owner's request] |
What has McGuinness done, other than make Woolfenden the nervous experienced partner? | |
| |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 20:59 - Feb 9 with 592 views | J4ck22 |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 20:58 - Feb 9 by gordon |
Couldn't he have just played Chambers alongside Woolfenden at centre-half, with Matheson and Kenlock at full-back? |
That would have been the logical decision... So no. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 21:00 - Feb 9 with 557 views | OsborneOneNil |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 20:58 - Feb 9 by gordon |
Couldn't he have just played Chambers alongside Woolfenden at centre-half, with Matheson and Kenlock at full-back? |
Or just keep the back four from the weekend. |  | | |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 21:01 - Feb 9 with 496 views | bluejacko |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 21:00 - Feb 9 by OsborneOneNil |
Or just keep the back four from the weekend. |
Now now don’t be sensible! | | | |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 21:04 - Feb 9 with 447 views | Herbivore |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 21:00 - Feb 9 by OsborneOneNil |
Or just keep the back four from the weekend. |
The pairing of McGuiness and Woolfie has largely been poor. Blackpool had nothing up front, that game is not the best to judge them on. |  |
| |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 21:04 - Feb 9 with 442 views | pointofblue |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 21:00 - Feb 9 by OsborneOneNil |
Or just keep the back four from the weekend. |
Still too porous IMO - it was such a young defence at the weekend and a lack of Madine helped us.
Matheson and Kenlock shouldn’t have been dropped though. | |
| |
| Lambert too weak to stand up to Chambers? on 21:04 - Feb 9 with 438 views | jayessess |
Today's whole lineup was ridiculous. We've played well once in the last 3 months and he changes half the team and the formation, away at the best home team in the division. A team he reckoned we'd been "great" against with 4-3-3.
It smacked of a concession not just to Chambers, but also to Ward and to Norwood, for whom we had to change formation. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
