Cosmic dawn 22:27 - Jun 24 with 1563 views | earlsgreenblue | Blimey they’ve narrowed it down……….the first stars formed between 250 million & 350 million years ago, good job nobody blinked! |  | | |  |
(No subject) (n/t) on 22:58 - Jun 24 with 1499 views | lightuser | lol. Looks like I got hit by the update. Anyway, in your effort to make a joke, you have got this mixed up. The first stars have been observed to have been born about 250-350 hundred million years AFTER the Big Bang (the Big Bang was about 14 billion years ago). So in geologic time, it's very quick. It's also, strangely enough, the same sort of time period that it is thought to have been when life first appeared on the Earth (the Earth is about 4 billion years old). [Post edited 24 Jun 2021 23:43]
|  | |  |
Cosmic dawn on 23:16 - Jun 24 with 1479 views | StokieBlue | Just a small point of order, they formed between 250m and 350m after the big bang. Given they are looking back 13.8bn years that's quite a good range. SB |  |
|  |
Cosmic dawn on 23:30 - Jun 24 with 1443 views | factual_blue |
Cosmic dawn on 23:16 - Jun 24 by StokieBlue | Just a small point of order, they formed between 250m and 350m after the big bang. Given they are looking back 13.8bn years that's quite a good range. SB |
I think you'll find Earth was on 23 October 4004 BCE. |  |
|  |
Cosmic dawn on 23:32 - Jun 24 with 1450 views | StokieBlue |
Cosmic dawn on 23:30 - Jun 24 by factual_blue | I think you'll find Earth was on 23 October 4004 BCE. |
Only if you believe is sky fairies. And don't believe in dinosaurs. SB |  |
|  |
Cosmic dawn on 23:33 - Jun 24 with 1433 views | factual_blue |
Cosmic dawn on 23:32 - Jun 24 by StokieBlue | Only if you believe is sky fairies. And don't believe in dinosaurs. SB |
Well, if it's good enough for James Ussher, it's good enough for me. |  |
|  |
Cosmic dawn on 23:34 - Jun 24 with 1442 views | WeWereZombies |
Cosmic dawn on 23:30 - Jun 24 by factual_blue | I think you'll find Earth was on 23 October 4004 BCE. |
I guess you were one of the first ones in... |  |
|  |
Cosmic dawn on 23:38 - Jun 24 with 1433 views | lightuser |
Cosmic dawn on 23:16 - Jun 24 by StokieBlue | Just a small point of order, they formed between 250m and 350m after the big bang. Given they are looking back 13.8bn years that's quite a good range. SB |
Damn that update. Missed out on an upvote. 😠But I have gone to the effort of adding some extra info.ðŸ‘😉 |  | |  |
Cosmic dawn on 23:42 - Jun 24 with 1420 views | BlueBadger |
Cosmic dawn on 23:32 - Jun 24 by StokieBlue | Only if you believe is sky fairies. And don't believe in dinosaurs. SB |
Be fair here, Facters was an eye witness. |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
Cosmic dawn on 08:35 - Jun 25 with 1271 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
Cosmic dawn on 23:30 - Jun 24 by factual_blue | I think you'll find Earth was on 23 October 4004 BCE. |
24th of October idiot. 4004 BCE was a leap year. |  |
|  |
Cosmic dawn on 05:23 - Jun 26 with 1134 views | Ryorry | Also, for those interested - |  |
|  |
Cosmic dawn on 13:04 - Jun 26 with 1051 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
Cosmic dawn on 05:23 - Jun 26 by Ryorry | Also, for those interested - |
Fascinating stuff, thanks Ry. |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
|  |
Cosmic dawn on 13:29 - Jun 26 with 1024 views | lightuser |
Yes, unfortunately another time bandit website added to my favourites. Thanks Ryorry. 😢😉 |  | |  |
Cosmic dawn on 15:09 - Jun 26 with 988 views | Ryorry |
Cosmic dawn on 13:29 - Jun 26 by lightuser | Yes, unfortunately another time bandit website added to my favourites. Thanks Ryorry. 😢😉 |
He's absolutely excellent - I'm not usually into that stuff, but his photos are amazing & draw you in. |  |
|  |
Cosmic dawn on 16:31 - Jun 26 with 969 views | lightuser |
Cosmic dawn on 15:09 - Jun 26 by Ryorry | He's absolutely excellent - I'm not usually into that stuff, but his photos are amazing & draw you in. |
To be honest Ryorry, I don't look at the photo's much. Most of them are just equivalent to an "artists impression", that is, made to look pretty with false colours and all that for the various spectra to get a nice "photo". Even the recent black hole image was an amalgum of teams putting together their best guess. I prefer the raw science (actually the summaries because I'm too thick to understand the math). 😠If you look at the pictures for something like plate tectonics, they look like sometihng drawn on a beer mat, or back of a fag packet. That'll do for me . lol |  | |  |
| |