Should Ashton have rewarded McKenna sooner? 18:24 - May 23 with 1637 views | Wallingford_Boy | Has the delay in a new deal allowed others to sniff around? Surely there would have been a plan in place, get us up, rewarded with an improved deal. Maybe then others would have been warned off. Or maybe not, just playing devils advocate really.. |  |
| |  |
Should Ashton have rewarded McKenna sooner? on 18:26 - May 23 with 1600 views | DinDjarin | How do we even know there was a new deal offered? Surely there would have been an improved contract automatically triggered as part of promotion anyway. |  | |  |
Should Ashton have rewarded McKenna sooner? on 18:26 - May 23 with 1590 views | MK1 | Everyone will be rewarded for promotion. Sure McKenna knew he would be given a hefty rise. |  |
|  |
Should Ashton have rewarded McKenna sooner? on 18:37 - May 23 with 1501 views | BlueandTruesince82 | He got a new deal 12 months ago and we confirmed promotion on the last day of this season, I'd imagine he was one of the best paid managers in the division . |  |
|  |
Should Ashton have rewarded McKenna sooner? on 18:42 - May 23 with 1453 views | Churchman | No. The relationship between Ashton and McKenna was meant to be strong and he must have known he would be rewarded further should he achieve the impossible. He either wants to be here or he doesn’t. A new contract offer is not going to change that if he wants to go to the bright lights of Brighton or the basket weavers convention at Chelsea. |  | |  |
Should Ashton have rewarded McKenna sooner? on 18:45 - May 23 with 1417 views | Marshalls_Mullet | Nah, wouldn't make a difference if Utd approaches. Chelsea job seems to have gone. He won't go to Brighton, as they have already peaked. He'll still get the pay rise that his agents desire. |  |
|  |
Should Ashton have rewarded McKenna sooner? on 18:48 - May 23 with 1380 views | Bossy | That's a negative. |  |
|  |
Should Ashton have rewarded McKenna sooner? on 18:51 - May 23 with 1330 views | Jon_456 | Or they agreed a deal weeks ago and they’re both now just laughing at all the rumours floating about. One hopes… |  | |  |
Should Ashton have rewarded McKenna sooner? on 19:08 - May 23 with 1192 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Should Ashton have rewarded McKenna sooner? on 18:51 - May 23 by Jon_456 | Or they agreed a deal weeks ago and they’re both now just laughing at all the rumours floating about. One hopes… |
If that were they case, they would announce the new deal. |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
Should Ashton have rewarded McKenna sooner? on 19:14 - May 23 with 1144 views | NthQldITFC |
Should Ashton have rewarded McKenna sooner? on 18:45 - May 23 by Marshalls_Mullet | Nah, wouldn't make a difference if Utd approaches. Chelsea job seems to have gone. He won't go to Brighton, as they have already peaked. He'll still get the pay rise that his agents desire. |
Has the Chelsea job gone? I've been switched off this afternoon, but I've not seen any news on this. |  |
|  |
Should Ashton have rewarded McKenna sooner? on 19:15 - May 23 with 1127 views | Vic | In a word - No! I doubt he knew the level of speculation and presumably quantifiable interest from other clubs that was about to come KM’s way. I’m even more sure that there would have been a sizeable promotion bonus in his package. So no I don’t think it’s reasonable to have expected him to have acted sooner. Plus, as others have said, we don’t know if an increase has been offered and if it has what it actually is. |  |
|  |
Should Ashton have rewarded McKenna sooner? on 19:17 - May 23 with 1094 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Should Ashton have rewarded McKenna sooner? on 19:14 - May 23 by NthQldITFC | Has the Chelsea job gone? I've been switched off this afternoon, but I've not seen any news on this. |
Reported that Chelsea have approached Leicester for Maresca. |  |
|  |
Should Ashton have rewarded McKenna sooner? on 07:08 - May 24 with 797 views | Wallingford_Boy |
Should Ashton have rewarded McKenna sooner? on 18:26 - May 23 by DinDjarin | How do we even know there was a new deal offered? Surely there would have been an improved contract automatically triggered as part of promotion anyway. |
That’s kind of my point! |  |
|  |
| |