| Waghorn turns down Boro 13:20 - Aug 6 with 2708 views | BluedanW |
Sky sports reporting that Waghorn is at Derby for a medical after turning down Boro.
Could this be why we are accepting £2M less than we wanted? Maybe Boro offered more like the fee we wanted but Waghorn snubbed Middlesbrough. Left us having to take the lower Derby offer due to how close we are to the end of the transfer window. Especially as Hurst has his targets. I hope we sign Jackson now or it seems silly to be pressured into selling with no replacement. Once bitten with Daryl Murphy exit, I'd like to think we'd learnt our lesson. |  | | |  |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:22 - Aug 6 with 2656 views | kizaitfc |
I thought Waghorn was very keen on moving back up north, therefore I'd assume Derby are offering a far better contract in terms of years and salary then Boro were. | |
| |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:22 - Aug 6 with 2651 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Doubt it.
Sounds like the offers where at a similar level.
Didnt sound as though Boro had matched our valuation either.
Anyway, it is £5m, potentially £7-8m.
Onwards and upwards.
Thanks Waggy. |  |
| |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:24 - Aug 6 with 2596 views | DanFord |
A bit of a odd one really. As someone said Derby have Nugent, Marriott, Jofazoon, Mount, Wilson, Bennett, Martin and about five others! He may fancy his chances of getting in ahead of them all, but it's still a hell of a lot of competition. | |
| |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:28 - Aug 6 with 2551 views | itfcjoe |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:22 - Aug 6 by kizaitfc |
I thought Waghorn was very keen on moving back up north, therefore I'd assume Derby are offering a far better contract in terms of years and salary then Boro were. |
I'd heard Waggy didn't want to play under Pulis and was much more excited by prospect of Lampard at Derby.
Contracts on offer were much the same |  |
| |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:29 - Aug 6 with 2519 views | BluedanW |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:22 - Aug 6 by kizaitfc |
I thought Waghorn was very keen on moving back up north, therefore I'd assume Derby are offering a far better contract in terms of years and salary then Boro were. |
Sheffield United manager Chris Wilder has issued an update the Blades’ pursuit of Martyn Waghorn and the reported interest in their defender Jack O’Connell.
On Waghorn…
“He’s a player that interests us but we’ve been blown out of the water in terms of the wages that the club he’s going to have offered. We can’t break our wage structure and we couldn’t go to the fee Ipswich wanted.”
Obviously the Wages were higher at Derby! How they don't go bankrupt i don't know! | | | |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:30 - Aug 6 with 2493 views | Bluefish |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:28 - Aug 6 by itfcjoe |
I'd heard Waggy didn't want to play under Pulis and was much more excited by prospect of Lampard at Derby.
Contracts on offer were much the same |
Reports here say then derby offer gave Ipswich much better add ods. Realistic 2.5 million to be had.
I wonder what they are? Hopefully appearance related or linked to play offs not promotion |  |
| |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:31 - Aug 6 with 2467 views | Cambonbleu |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:28 - Aug 6 by itfcjoe |
I'd heard Waggy didn't want to play under Pulis and was much more excited by prospect of Lampard at Derby.
Contracts on offer were much the same |
But, you'd assume, much more than his current wages. I'd really like to know if ME approached him about a new deal and wether the response was a) ME couldn't match it or b) Waggy was dead set on going to Derby to play under Lampard whatever happened |  |
| |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:34 - Aug 6 with 2398 views | itfcjoe |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:31 - Aug 6 by Cambonbleu |
But, you'd assume, much more than his current wages. I'd really like to know if ME approached him about a new deal and wether the response was a) ME couldn't match it or b) Waggy was dead set on going to Derby to play under Lampard whatever happened |
We couldn't get near what those sides are offering - our wage structures are miles apart - and also they are much more likely to go up so it's a very attractive move for Waghorn | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:50 - Aug 6 with 2245 views | OsborneOneNil |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:28 - Aug 6 by itfcjoe |
I'd heard Waggy didn't want to play under Pulis and was much more excited by prospect of Lampard at Derby.
Contracts on offer were much the same |
I can totally get that. |  | | |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:52 - Aug 6 with 2210 views | chicoazul |
It will be because Derby are going to pay him more. |  |
| |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:53 - Aug 6 with 2186 views | hype313 |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:34 - Aug 6 by itfcjoe |
We couldn't get near what those sides are offering - our wage structures are miles apart - and also they are much more likely to go up so it's a very attractive move for Waghorn |
Let's say Derby do go up, can you really see Lampard having him spearhead the attack in the PL? I can't, Waghorn won't care though as he's probably on £30-40k a week regardless. |  |
| |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:59 - Aug 6 with 2091 views | JimmyJazz |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:24 - Aug 6 by DanFord |
A bit of a odd one really. As someone said Derby have Nugent, Marriott, Jofazoon, Mount, Wilson, Bennett, Martin and about five others! He may fancy his chances of getting in ahead of them all, but it's still a hell of a lot of competition. |
Watched the Reading v Derby game - looked like they were crying out for a Waghorn type forward
Vydra, Martin, Jerome all seemingly out of the picture
Nugent looked isolated and not up to the task, Marriott not even in the squad
Jofazoon, Mount and Wilson and more midfielders
When Nugent went off they turned to Mason Bennett who did well, but that showed where they currently are striker wise |  |
| |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 14:03 - Aug 6 with 2058 views | Wickets |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:30 - Aug 6 by Bluefish |
Reports here say then derby offer gave Ipswich much better add ods. Realistic 2.5 million to be had.
I wonder what they are? Hopefully appearance related or linked to play offs not promotion |
I have said much the same on another thread regards add-ons , i'm hopefull Phil might be able to enlighten us in due course? |  | | |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 14:11 - Aug 6 with 1974 views | blaggers |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:28 - Aug 6 by itfcjoe |
I'd heard Waggy didn't want to play under Pulis and was much more excited by prospect of Lampard at Derby.
Contracts on offer were much the same |
Exactly what I heard. |  |
| |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 14:19 - Aug 6 with 1900 views | Archer4721 |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:28 - Aug 6 by itfcjoe |
I'd heard Waggy didn't want to play under Pulis and was much more excited by prospect of Lampard at Derby.
Contracts on offer were much the same |
He was very excited when Lampard was touted for ITFC job |  | | |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 14:35 - Aug 6 with 1826 views | itfcjoe |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:53 - Aug 6 by hype313 |
Let's say Derby do go up, can you really see Lampard having him spearhead the attack in the PL? I can't, Waghorn won't care though as he's probably on £30-40k a week regardless. |
I suppose it doesn't matter at that point - he's on the money, with probably a big increase when they go up and it can't be taken away.
Same as Murphy when he went to Newcastle, he doubles his money on a 3 year deal as opposed to a 2 year one - so his next club have to take that into account when buying him or current pay him up if they don't want him.
It's like getting promoted at work up a grade or two - it doesn't matter how sh*t you are because you get a better CV and just get moved sideways at worst | |
| |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 16:32 - Aug 6 with 1658 views | No9 |
| Waghorn turns down Boro on 13:28 - Aug 6 by itfcjoe |
I'd heard Waggy didn't want to play under Pulis and was much more excited by prospect of Lampard at Derby.
Contracts on offer were much the same |
Pretty easy choice one would have thought? | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
