Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Surely Harness means no Celina? 23:23 - Jul 15 with 1883 viewsITFC_Forever

Get Hirst (and watch the Pompey fans cry even more) and Lief and shut the window.

P 1162, W 506, D 298, L 358, F 1749, A 1435 92/92
Blog: Confessions of a Statto - Why We Bother

3
Surely Harness means no Celina? on 02:42 - Jul 16 with 1625 viewsKropotkin123

That's my thinking too. But I'm often incorrect on these things, so maybe he's signing on Monday.

Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top.
Poll: Would you rather
Blog: Round Four: Eagle

0
[Redacted] on 03:14 - Jul 16 with 1606 viewsvictorywilhappen

Surely Harness means no Celina? on 02:42 - Jul 16 by Kropotkin123

That's my thinking too. But I'm often incorrect on these things, so maybe he's signing on Monday.


[Redacted]
0
Surely Harness means no Celina? on 07:59 - Jul 16 with 1383 viewsKropotkin123

[Redacted] on 03:14 - Jul 16 by victorywilhappen

[Redacted]


Oh, fair enough. If that's the case then KM will probably still want two more attacking options

Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top.
Poll: Would you rather
Blog: Round Four: Eagle

0
Surely Harness means no Celina? on 08:06 - Jul 16 with 1330 viewsPinewoodblue

[Redacted] on 03:14 - Jul 16 by victorywilhappen

[Redacted]


My first thought was no Jackson.

2023 year of destiny
Poll: Dickhead "Noun" a stupid, irritating, or ridiculous man.

0
Surely Harness means no Celina? on 08:11 - Jul 16 with 1300 viewsITFC_Forever

Surely Harness means no Celina? on 08:06 - Jul 16 by Pinewoodblue

My first thought was no Jackson.


Maybe not as first choice, but under McK last season, he clearly showed he had something to offer, which is why he was given a new contract.

P 1162, W 506, D 298, L 358, F 1749, A 1435 92/92
Blog: Confessions of a Statto - Why We Bother

0
Surely Harness means no Celina? on 08:58 - Jul 16 with 1188 viewstractordownsouth

Andy Warren doesn’t seem to think so. Presumably we’ll still play in the 3-4-2-1 formation so I can’t see both Celina and Hurst joining. Even with just the one of them, the squad in that area looks stacked.

AM: Chaplin, Aluko, Harness, Celina. Edwards
ST: Jackson, John-Jules, Ladapo
[Post edited 16 Jul 2022 9:10]

Poll: Preferred Lambert replacement?
Blog: No Time to Panic Yet

0
Surely Harness means no Celina? on 09:02 - Jul 16 with 1166 viewsSTYG

Surely Harness means no Celina? on 08:58 - Jul 16 by tractordownsouth

Andy Warren doesn’t seem to think so. Presumably we’ll still play in the 3-4-2-1 formation so I can’t see both Celina and Hurst joining. Even with just the one of them, the squad in that area looks stacked.

AM: Chaplin, Aluko, Harness, Celina. Edwards
ST: Jackson, John-Jules, Ladapo
[Post edited 16 Jul 2022 9:10]


Still think Edwards joins that group as well. Some front line!
1
Surely Harness means no Celina? on 09:03 - Jul 16 with 1145 viewstractorboy1978

Surely Harness means no Celina? on 08:58 - Jul 16 by tractordownsouth

Andy Warren doesn’t seem to think so. Presumably we’ll still play in the 3-4-2-1 formation so I can’t see both Celina and Hurst joining. Even with just the one of them, the squad in that area looks stacked.

AM: Chaplin, Aluko, Harness, Celina. Edwards
ST: Jackson, John-Jules, Ladapo
[Post edited 16 Jul 2022 9:10]


5 subs next season though so could easily play 8 attacking players in every game.
0
Login to get fewer ads

Surely Harness means no Celina? on 09:10 - Jul 16 with 1094 viewstractordownsouth

Surely Harness means no Celina? on 09:02 - Jul 16 by STYG

Still think Edwards joins that group as well. Some front line!


Knew I’d forgotten someone. Part of me is worried we're going to end up with another bloated squad, even with the 5 subs.

Poll: Preferred Lambert replacement?
Blog: No Time to Panic Yet

0
Surely Harness means no Celina? on 10:35 - Jul 16 with 938 viewsTomTheWriter

[Redacted] on 03:14 - Jul 16 by victorywilhappen

[Redacted]


Harness is not a wing-back. RW/RAM/LAM/LW is where he will play, whether we go 3-4-3 or 3-4-2-1

Blog: Where to Exploit and How to Avoid Being Exploited - Brentford

0
Surely Harness means no Celina? on 10:41 - Jul 16 with 912 viewsSouthfieldsBlue

Surely Harness means no Celina? on 02:42 - Jul 16 by Kropotkin123

That's my thinking too. But I'm often incorrect on these things, so maybe he's signing on Monday.


I get the distinct impression, that much the same as last year, if Celina can be signed he will be signed, regardless of the wider squad situation. Whilst that would leave us one heavy, we are likely to be missing Burns for a bit of the season, Aluko isn't getting any younger and Edwards is very injury prone.
0
Surely Harness means no Celina? on 11:25 - Jul 16 with 803 viewspointofblue

Surely Harness means no Celina? on 10:41 - Jul 16 by SouthfieldsBlue

I get the distinct impression, that much the same as last year, if Celina can be signed he will be signed, regardless of the wider squad situation. Whilst that would leave us one heavy, we are likely to be missing Burns for a bit of the season, Aluko isn't getting any younger and Edwards is very injury prone.


Though my concern is we’re too heavy but light at the back. The first choice defence is Donacien, Woolfenden and Edmundson.
Second choice is Burgess, Ndaba and who else? Guess we could be relying on Leigh or Ball to drop in there but, with the latter, what do we do in midfield if we lose, say, both Edmundson and Evans, as we did last season? Presume move Leigh in and that’s why we’re still searching for another left back.

Current First XI: Walton - Donacien, Woolfenden, Edmundson - Burns, Morsy, Evans, Leigh - Harness, Jackson, Ladapo

Current Second XI: Hladky - Ndaba, Burgess, Penney - Vincent-Young, Ball, Harper, Edwards - Aluko, Chaplin, John-Jules

Ball, Aluko and Chaplin will play a fair number of games, of course, so not really ‘second XI’. Get a left (wing) back in who can play centre back if needed plus a striker and we’re set.

Out of those who we’ll loan out or sell, Penney and El Mizouni are the obvious two. Perhaps Harper as well though we’d need someone in if we’re getting rid of both him and Idris.

Poll: Who would you play at right centre back on Saturday?

0
Surely Harness means no Celina? on 11:53 - Jul 16 with 756 viewsSkip_Intro

Surely Harness means no Celina? on 11:25 - Jul 16 by pointofblue

Though my concern is we’re too heavy but light at the back. The first choice defence is Donacien, Woolfenden and Edmundson.
Second choice is Burgess, Ndaba and who else? Guess we could be relying on Leigh or Ball to drop in there but, with the latter, what do we do in midfield if we lose, say, both Edmundson and Evans, as we did last season? Presume move Leigh in and that’s why we’re still searching for another left back.

Current First XI: Walton - Donacien, Woolfenden, Edmundson - Burns, Morsy, Evans, Leigh - Harness, Jackson, Ladapo

Current Second XI: Hladky - Ndaba, Burgess, Penney - Vincent-Young, Ball, Harper, Edwards - Aluko, Chaplin, John-Jules

Ball, Aluko and Chaplin will play a fair number of games, of course, so not really ‘second XI’. Get a left (wing) back in who can play centre back if needed plus a striker and we’re set.

Out of those who we’ll loan out or sell, Penney and El Mizouni are the obvious two. Perhaps Harper as well though we’d need someone in if we’re getting rid of both him and Idris.


I'm pretty sure Chaplin will be a nailed on starter and Ball will replace Evans in the 1st 11...
0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025