| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) 15:33 - Feb 4 with 2543 views | FrimleyBlue |
|  |
| |  |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:34 - Feb 4 with 2091 views | Schmoke |
You're right....
He would've let him wriggle past him and score a la Wycombe |  | | |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:35 - Feb 4 with 2059 views | StokieBlue |
Would have just let him walk past and score instead like he did in his last game?
SB |  | | |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:36 - Feb 4 with 2035 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:35 - Feb 4 by StokieBlue |
Would have just let him walk past and score instead like he did in his last game?
SB |
We'll never know SB.
But your man has been shte today. | |
| |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:36 - Feb 4 with 2011 views | J2BLUE |
Gav please make the ignore function fit for purpose. |  |
| |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:42 - Feb 4 with 1901 views | StokieBlue |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:36 - Feb 4 by J2BLUE |
Gav please make the ignore function fit for purpose. |
He's never happier than when something bad happens and he can point to a hot take.
Interesting given a few weeks back he said he was going to stop posting during the match.
SB | | | |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:44 - Feb 4 with 1888 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:42 - Feb 4 by StokieBlue |
He's never happier than when something bad happens and he can point to a hot take.
Interesting given a few weeks back he said he was going to stop posting during the match.
SB |
Nah. Change my mind. | |
| |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:49 - Feb 4 with 1811 views | J2BLUE |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:44 - Feb 4 by FrimleyBlue |
Nah. Change my mind. |
We can't.
You've really leaned into this negative div persona and you will always find something to whinge about.
You make the site unusable on ignore. | |
| |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:50 - Feb 4 with 1799 views | bazza |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:49 - Feb 4 by J2BLUE |
We can't.
You've really leaned into this negative div persona and you will always find something to whinge about.
You make the site unusable on ignore. |
Should have a boot off for 24hrs button. 😂 |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:50 - Feb 4 with 1782 views | TalkingBlues |
Edmundson was immense last game, but he looks like he's never kicked a ball today, I just don't understand how form can swing so wildly in such a short space of time. |  |
| |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:51 - Feb 4 with 1751 views | StokieBlue |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:49 - Feb 4 by J2BLUE |
We can't.
You've really leaned into this negative div persona and you will always find something to whinge about.
You make the site unusable on ignore. |
Should never have been unbanned after calling various posters d1ckheads.
Phil's worst ever decision on here in my opinion.
SB | | | |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:53 - Feb 4 with 1706 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:49 - Feb 4 by J2BLUE |
We can't.
You've really leaned into this negative div persona and you will always find something to whinge about.
You make the site unusable on ignore. |
Lol 0-1 down v Cambridge and your expecting positive posts only. | |
| |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:54 - Feb 4 with 1692 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:51 - Feb 4 by StokieBlue |
Should never have been unbanned after calling various posters d1ckheads.
Phil's worst ever decision on here in my opinion.
SB |
Seen some of your general tab posts which are far worse SB. So pot kettle. | |
| |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:55 - Feb 4 with 1655 views | J2BLUE |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:53 - Feb 4 by FrimleyBlue |
Lol 0-1 down v Cambridge and your expecting positive posts only. |
You are not this thick.
That's two posts in about 5 minutes you have deliberately misinterpreted. | |
| |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:55 - Feb 4 with 1618 views | StokieBlue |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:54 - Feb 4 by FrimleyBlue |
Seen some of your general tab posts which are far worse SB. So pot kettle. |
Report them to Phil then.
In fact, why don't you post links to them here? Don't think I've ever called anyone a d1ckhead or anything like it. I've never been banned by Phil so he clearly doesn't agree given you were banned.
Just more of your lies, barely anything you post anymore is truthful.
SB | | | |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:56 - Feb 4 with 1584 views | StokieBlue |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:55 - Feb 4 by J2BLUE |
You are not this thick.
That's two posts in about 5 minutes you have deliberately misinterpreted. |
It's every post now.
It's either disingenuous or a lie.
I'm glad other posters are seeing it now as well as he always claims it's me making stuff up or having an agenda.
SB | | | |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:59 - Feb 4 with 1542 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:55 - Feb 4 by StokieBlue |
Report them to Phil then.
In fact, why don't you post links to them here? Don't think I've ever called anyone a d1ckhead or anything like it. I've never been banned by Phil so he clearly doesn't agree given you were banned.
Just more of your lies, barely anything you post anymore is truthful.
SB |
SB you're talking about a post over 2 years old.
I know it's on your spreadsheet but come one surely you want some new material. | |
| |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 16:05 - Feb 4 with 1479 views | ThisIsMyUsername |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:53 - Feb 4 by FrimleyBlue |
Lol 0-1 down v Cambridge and your expecting positive posts only. |
You don't get a great reception generally. I think your (occasional) interesting and vaguely sensible posts, particularly to do with the football, would be better received if everyone wasn't conditioned to expect sarcastic sounding negative tripe whenever they see that you've posted a new comment.
It's hard to see what enjoyment you take from posting on here. It can't be that emotionally satisfying, nor good for your health, to spend so much time in a virtual confrontation with strangers, and there are hundreds if not thousands of potential pastimes and hobbies that might be more beneficial to take up. |  |
| |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 16:08 - Feb 4 with 1437 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 16:05 - Feb 4 by ThisIsMyUsername |
You don't get a great reception generally. I think your (occasional) interesting and vaguely sensible posts, particularly to do with the football, would be better received if everyone wasn't conditioned to expect sarcastic sounding negative tripe whenever they see that you've posted a new comment.
It's hard to see what enjoyment you take from posting on here. It can't be that emotionally satisfying, nor good for your health, to spend so much time in a virtual confrontation with strangers, and there are hundreds if not thousands of potential pastimes and hobbies that might be more beneficial to take up. |
Very sensible post
Just needs everyone to ignore the poster and don’t interact |  |
| |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 16:09 - Feb 4 with 1420 views | blueasfook |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:51 - Feb 4 by StokieBlue |
Should never have been unbanned after calling various posters d1ckheads.
Phil's worst ever decision on here in my opinion.
SB |
You said letting me back was Phil's worst decision. Make your mind up! |  |
| |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 16:10 - Feb 4 with 1393 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 16:08 - Feb 4 by Metal_Hacker |
Very sensible post
Just needs everyone to ignore the poster and don’t interact |
Says the poster that joins in with the others to goad said poster and then moan about the volume of posts...
Iqs etc. | |
| |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 16:12 - Feb 4 with 1346 views | StokieBlue |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 16:09 - Feb 4 by blueasfook |
You said letting me back was Phil's worst decision. Make your mind up! |
Circumstances have changed as has my opinion.
SB | | | |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 16:13 - Feb 4 with 1304 views | blueasfook |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 16:12 - Feb 4 by StokieBlue |
Circumstances have changed as has my opinion.
SB |
Phew! I am off Stokie's hitlist. I will sleep better tonight for knowing that. | |
| |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 16:15 - Feb 4 with 1253 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 16:10 - Feb 4 by FrimleyBlue |
Says the poster that joins in with the others to goad said poster and then moan about the volume of posts...
Iqs etc. |
Just disappear you sad individual | |
| |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 16:25 - Feb 4 with 1166 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 16:15 - Feb 4 by Metal_Hacker |
Just disappear you sad individual |
Lol | |
| |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 17:09 - Feb 4 with 1067 views | Ryorry |
| Burgess wouldn't have done that. (n/t) on 15:36 - Feb 4 by J2BLUE |
Gav please make the ignore function fit for purpose. |
That's both illogical & unfair on Gav.
If you'd had FB on ignore, this thread would have been invisible to you, so you wouldn't have even been aware of it to get annoyed either by it or by FB again. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
