| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:04 - Mar 16 with 3039 views | WeirdFishes |
Brilliant, pretty sure I’m on 9 away games. |  |
|  |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:08 - Mar 16 with 3001 views | hoppy |
Think I was ahead of you on this one...
 |  |
| |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:14 - Mar 16 with 2956 views | SitfcB |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:08 - Mar 16 by hoppy |
Think I was ahead of you on this one...
|
Got to let others have a chance. |  |
| |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:20 - Mar 16 with 2912 views | JakeITFC |
Can’t imagine there are many more than 1,000 with ten aways, certainly nowhere near the Posh allocation. |  | | |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:30 - Mar 16 with 2851 views | Illinoisblue |
Quickly, to the ITFC FB page, let’s see how many people struggle with the concept of limited supply. |  |
| |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:34 - Mar 16 with 2789 views | TractorCam |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:20 - Mar 16 by JakeITFC |
Can’t imagine there are many more than 1,000 with ten aways, certainly nowhere near the Posh allocation. |
Indeed, Peterborough will be unaffected by this and will still sell early season ticket phase. Cheltenham will probably end 5 minutes earlier now, let's be honest 99% of these people will be gold card holders anyway. |  |
| |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:34 - Mar 16 with 2799 views | textbackup |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:20 - Mar 16 by JakeITFC |
Can’t imagine there are many more than 1,000 with ten aways, certainly nowhere near the Posh allocation. |
Seems weird to put it in place for posh
But if 10 aways are needed for Cheltenham I’d say fleetwood will be 13/14 maybe |  |
| |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:35 - Mar 16 with 2791 views | lizzibee |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:20 - Mar 16 by JakeITFC |
Can’t imagine there are many more than 1,000 with ten aways, certainly nowhere near the Posh allocation. |
I suspect its closer to the allocation hence saying the ten games. That's how they worked it for the Bracknell game. Travelling to most games I see the same faces, and a lot of them, at all the games so if it does go past letter don't expect it to go much further. The allocation at Fleetwood is even less so probably raise the number of games for the letter |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:36 - Mar 16 with 2776 views | CobboldCrusty |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:04 - Mar 16 by WeirdFishes |
Brilliant, pretty sure I’m on 9 away games. |
Same :( |  | | |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:41 - Mar 16 with 2725 views | JakeITFC |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:34 - Mar 16 by textbackup |
Seems weird to put it in place for posh
But if 10 aways are needed for Cheltenham I’d say fleetwood will be 13/14 maybe |
Yup, think you’re right (which is quite mad - attendance of over 50% of away games needed for priority, shows how good our followings have been this year). | | | |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:44 - Mar 16 with 2698 views | xrayspecs |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:41 - Mar 16 by JakeITFC |
Yup, think you’re right (which is quite mad - attendance of over 50% of away games needed for priority, shows how good our followings have been this year). |
There are also four more away games before fleetwood… | | | |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:49 - Mar 16 with 2658 views | TractorCam |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:34 - Mar 16 by textbackup |
Seems weird to put it in place for posh
But if 10 aways are needed for Cheltenham I’d say fleetwood will be 13/14 maybe |
Weird one, I don't see why they'd change it as you'd imagine the number is enough for tickets, but then why would they not say Fleetwood? | |
| |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 16:12 - Mar 16 with 2514 views | lizzibee |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:49 - Mar 16 by TractorCam |
Weird one, I don't see why they'd change it as you'd imagine the number is enough for tickets, but then why would they not say Fleetwood? |
I guess they are not sure how many Fleetwood tickets they have yet, but I understand around the 800 mark so will need to see how many have been to how many games and work out a priority number at that point | | | |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 17:04 - Mar 16 with 2330 views | ITFC_Forever |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:34 - Mar 16 by textbackup |
Seems weird to put it in place for posh
But if 10 aways are needed for Cheltenham I’d say fleetwood will be 13/14 maybe |
But then we will have had Derby, Posh and Barnsley.
You'd think that if you qualify for a letter for Cheltenham, then you would for Fleetwood.
I think I might be on 10 this season, so just scrape in. |  |
| |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 17:17 - Mar 16 with 2285 views | Danny_G |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:34 - Mar 16 by textbackup |
Seems weird to put it in place for posh
But if 10 aways are needed for Cheltenham I’d say fleetwood will be 13/14 maybe |
Is ten not the cutoff for Fleetwood as well? That’s what the article says:
‘Due to demand, an adapted priority system has been put in place for Town's away fixtures between now and the end of the season.
The Blues face Cheltenham on Easter Monday before making the short trip to Peterborough for the penultimate game of April.
Finally, Kieran Mckenna's side will close out the 2022/23 campaign away at Fleetwood on
Sunday, 7 May.
Priority for the above fixtures is being given to supporters who have been to at least 10 away league fixtures this season, up to and including last weekend's match against Bolton. | | | |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 17:18 - Mar 16 with 2268 views | SitfcB |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 17:17 - Mar 16 by Danny_G |
Is ten not the cutoff for Fleetwood as well? That’s what the article says:
‘Due to demand, an adapted priority system has been put in place for Town's away fixtures between now and the end of the season.
The Blues face Cheltenham on Easter Monday before making the short trip to Peterborough for the penultimate game of April.
Finally, Kieran Mckenna's side will close out the 2022/23 campaign away at Fleetwood on
Sunday, 7 May.
Priority for the above fixtures is being given to supporters who have been to at least 10 away league fixtures this season, up to and including last weekend's match against Bolton. |
That’s how I read it also. | |
| |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 17:51 - Mar 16 with 2159 views | Freddies_Ears |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 17:18 - Mar 16 by SitfcB |
That’s how I read it also. |
And it suggests that there are no more than 800 who have done 10+ away games, per ITFC records. | | | |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 18:15 - Mar 16 with 2086 views | pennblue |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:04 - Mar 16 by WeirdFishes |
Brilliant, pretty sure I’m on 9 away games. |
Ditto - damn | |
| |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 18:26 - Mar 16 with 2067 views | lizzibee |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:49 - Mar 16 by TractorCam |
Weird one, I don't see why they'd change it as you'd imagine the number is enough for tickets, but then why would they not say Fleetwood? |
I guess it's easier to have a standard methodology now for the remaining three games that have not been on sale. Posh (though they are far from posh) will go gold and possibly beyond so unlikely to be affected. Guess this is just easier for ticket office and everyone knows the score | | | |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 18:30 - Mar 16 with 2043 views | ITFC_Forever |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 17:51 - Mar 16 by Freddies_Ears |
And it suggests that there are no more than 800 who have done 10+ away games, per ITFC records. |
Where does it suggest that? | |
| |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 18:30 - Mar 16 with 2039 views | lizzibee |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 17:51 - Mar 16 by Freddies_Ears |
And it suggests that there are no more than 800 who have done 10+ away games, per ITFC records. |
That puts me more at ease in fairness. I assumed it may be more games needed. I have all bar two but the lad only has 12 and possibly not able to come to Barnsley (unless a migrant like he had at Burnley happens to re-appear - they are awful when they do and you just can't go to school) and can't make Derby as a friend has stupidly agreed to get married that day so the most he could make is 13 with Cheltenham. We did go to Cambridge but can't count them as had players tickets so not bought from club shop. Need to go to both to tick the off on grounds visited as I work my way through the 92 | | | |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 18:38 - Mar 16 with 2001 views | ITFC_Forever |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 18:30 - Mar 16 by lizzibee |
That puts me more at ease in fairness. I assumed it may be more games needed. I have all bar two but the lad only has 12 and possibly not able to come to Barnsley (unless a migrant like he had at Burnley happens to re-appear - they are awful when they do and you just can't go to school) and can't make Derby as a friend has stupidly agreed to get married that day so the most he could make is 13 with Cheltenham. We did go to Cambridge but can't count them as had players tickets so not bought from club shop. Need to go to both to tick the off on grounds visited as I work my way through the 92 |
Derby and Barnsley don’t count… it’s 10 league games up and including Bolton. | |
| |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 19:17 - Mar 16 with 1894 views | lizzibee |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 18:38 - Mar 16 by ITFC_Forever |
Derby and Barnsley don’t count… it’s 10 league games up and including Bolton. |
Maybe I should read things better. He is fine. I think I was thinking forward for Fleetwood. [Post edited 17 Mar 2023 10:03]
| | | |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 22:27 - Mar 16 with 1606 views | King_ding_a_lin_g |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 15:34 - Mar 16 by textbackup |
Seems weird to put it in place for posh
But if 10 aways are needed for Cheltenham I’d say fleetwood will be 13/14 maybe |
I've already got my ticket for Fleetwood... albeit not in the away end. |  | | |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 09:46 - Mar 17 with 1354 views | carlisleaway |
| New priority system for Cheltenham and Peterborough on 22:27 - Mar 16 by King_ding_a_lin_g |
I've already got my ticket for Fleetwood... albeit not in the away end. |
I think this is a very fair system, for those hard core fans who have gone to over 10 away games you certainly deserve this system. Having only gone to 5 away games, it does not bother me.
Also considering these fans will have travelled to Plymouth, Exeter, Bristol, Burnley, Accrington, Forest Green, Morecombe and Bolton. Count the cost and mileage these fans will have put in. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
