| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts 14:09 - Mar 30 with 2309 views | Bluefish |
would you still have the same view if the season is voided and either PRP uses that technicality to keep the job for another year or he takes us to court because mathematically we could have still been promoted? |  |
| |  |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:10 - Mar 30 with 1924 views | footers |
Probably more important things to think about right now. |  |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:11 - Mar 30 with 1915 views | jeera |
This must be exhausting. |  |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:12 - Mar 30 with 1904 views | NotSure |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:10 - Mar 30 by footers |
Probably more important things to think about right now. |
Perhaps but this is still foremost a football forum. |  | | |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:13 - Mar 30 with 1884 views | Bluefish |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:10 - Mar 30 by footers |
Probably more important things to think about right now. |
Yeah no one should ever talk about anything else ever again until this is all finished. All non corona talk is banned | |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:14 - Mar 30 with 1875 views | Bluefish |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:11 - Mar 30 by jeera |
This must be exhausting. |
Hardly. I am miles off the level of the mick posts and they went for ages longer | |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:16 - Mar 30 with 1861 views | Swailsey |
Dude. |  |
| Who said: "Colin Healy made Cesc Fabregas look like Colin Healy"? | We miss you TLA |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:19 - Mar 30 with 1844 views | StokieBlue |
What if he doesn't?
See, easy to come up with hypotheticals which are pointless at the moment.
Honestly, don't you have better things to do than obsess over PL? I'd be worried if I were him. You're probably posting this from up a tree outside his house in blatant defiance of the stay at home rules.
SB |  |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:20 - Mar 30 with 1828 views | fabian_illness |
What will your posts will be like in 3 months if you keep going at this rate?
Paul Lambert ate my hamster?
Paul Lambert p1ssed through my letterbox?
Paul Lambert spotted dealing crack outside the stadium? |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:22 - Mar 30 with 1812 views | judespiveyg |
The fact that you hate Lambert so much honestly makes him so much more likable. |  |
| I survived Ipswich 0-0 Burton |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:29 - Mar 30 with 1784 views | Bluefish |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:19 - Mar 30 by StokieBlue |
What if he doesn't?
See, easy to come up with hypotheticals which are pointless at the moment.
Honestly, don't you have better things to do than obsess over PL? I'd be worried if I were him. You're probably posting this from up a tree outside his house in blatant defiance of the stay at home rules.
SB |
If he walks away and says fair play I won't hide behind the technicality I'll accept the clause then I will have respect for that. He will still be the worst manager im our entire history and 2nd worst in damage done but I will have some respect for his gesture and some of his PR stunts will seem more genuine.
Wasn't that hard to answer the question was it? | |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:35 - Mar 30 with 1756 views | homer_123 |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:12 - Mar 30 by NotSure |
Perhaps but this is still foremost a football forum. |
Just a very very small point of order. Whilst on the face of it, this is a football forum - I think it only right to point out that one of things I (and I am sure others) value is the fact that it is far, far from just a football forum.
I value this aspect - the fact that you can talk about pretty much anything, discuss, debate, argue, disagree, moan, bitch and generally chat on anything and people are generally extremely supportive, actually quite knowledgeable at times, an awful lot. |  |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:37 - Mar 30 with 1742 views | Bluefish |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:35 - Mar 30 by homer_123 |
Just a very very small point of order. Whilst on the face of it, this is a football forum - I think it only right to point out that one of things I (and I am sure others) value is the fact that it is far, far from just a football forum.
I value this aspect - the fact that you can talk about pretty much anything, discuss, debate, argue, disagree, moan, bitch and generally chat on anything and people are generally extremely supportive, actually quite knowledgeable at times, an awful lot. |
We all know that and appreciate it. For some reason a few posters are just trying to use global events to shut down conversations they don't like. | |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:43 - Mar 30 with 1715 views | homer_123 |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:37 - Mar 30 by Bluefish |
We all know that and appreciate it. For some reason a few posters are just trying to use global events to shut down conversations they don't like. |
I, honestly, don't think that to be the case Fishers.
You've posted a thread and people have posted their reply. Sometimes people will agree with you, sometimes they won't and sometimes people might have a view on the thread an whether they believe it was worth posting.
It's not more or less complicated than that bud. | |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:45 - Mar 30 with 1708 views | Bluefish |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:43 - Mar 30 by homer_123 |
I, honestly, don't think that to be the case Fishers.
You've posted a thread and people have posted their reply. Sometimes people will agree with you, sometimes they won't and sometimes people might have a view on the thread an whether they believe it was worth posting.
It's not more or less complicated than that bud. |
I was referring the 1st reply.
The others know I'm right but just don't like it | |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:47 - Mar 30 with 1697 views | TheTrueBlue1878 |
A court trial wouldn't last 5 minutes.
Would be found in Lambert's favour at a click of the fingers if we tried to implement a break clause should the season be null and voided.
If it were, would be highly unlikely ME would pay off a 4 year contract for Lambert and staff. |  |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:50 - Mar 30 with 1682 views | Ewan_Oozami |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:13 - Mar 30 by Bluefish |
Yeah no one should ever talk about anything else ever again until this is all finished. All non corona talk is banned |
I think Footers is referring to the delayed delivery of his ChateauNeuf... |  |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:50 - Mar 30 with 1681 views | Bluefish |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:47 - Mar 30 by TheTrueBlue1878 |
A court trial wouldn't last 5 minutes.
Would be found in Lambert's favour at a click of the fingers if we tried to implement a break clause should the season be null and voided.
If it were, would be highly unlikely ME would pay off a 4 year contract for Lambert and staff. |
That wasn't the question. Try again | |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:53 - Mar 30 with 1662 views | TheTrueBlue1878 |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:50 - Mar 30 by Bluefish |
That wasn't the question. Try again |
I wasn't responding directly to your question.
Merely adding to the thread.
It's a seemingly silly question regardless. | |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:53 - Mar 30 with 1665 views | BlueBadger |
Bloody hell Fishers, you're approaching the same kind of lunacy Callis was the other week. Go and find some temp work at Tescos or something. |  |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:54 - Mar 30 with 1659 views | NotSure |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:29 - Mar 30 by Bluefish |
If he walks away and says fair play I won't hide behind the technicality I'll accept the clause then I will have respect for that. He will still be the worst manager im our entire history and 2nd worst in damage done but I will have some respect for his gesture and some of his PR stunts will seem more genuine.
Wasn't that hard to answer the question was it? |
If the season gets written off then so do his stats for this season.
He has time to reflect, look at where he went wrong, examine the players who were no good and make changes.
He gets another chance in my book and I still believe he is no mug but that there is this culture of accepting defeat at the club. | | | |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:55 - Mar 30 with 1651 views | Bluefish |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:53 - Mar 30 by TheTrueBlue1878 |
I wasn't responding directly to your question.
Merely adding to the thread.
It's a seemingly silly question regardless. |
Try again | |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:58 - Mar 30 with 1641 views | homer_123 |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:45 - Mar 30 by Bluefish |
I was referring the 1st reply.
The others know I'm right but just don't like it |
Footers reply is perfectly fine Fishers. There is nothing wrong with that post, it's a viewpoint on a thread you've posted.
As I say - you may not like the fact that someone has read your post and felt compelled to reply in such a way. It doesn't make your OP wrong or the reply wrong and it certainly isn't trying to shut down debate. Now, if Phil or Gav were taking down such threads as this, then you'd have a case.
You've posed a question - whilst some may answer that question, directly or indirectly, others might merely provide a differing view or alternative perspective or angle - others may not feel the post warrant discussion and will post as such - all are valid. | |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 15:04 - Mar 30 with 1624 views | Bluefish |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:53 - Mar 30 by BlueBadger |
Bloody hell Fishers, you're approaching the same kind of lunacy Callis was the other week. Go and find some temp work at Tescos or something. |
We need a brief interlude every now and again. I've had my fun with the morons for today, I'll be back tomorrow | |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 15:06 - Mar 30 with 1614 views | Ewan_Oozami |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 14:50 - Mar 30 by Bluefish |
That wasn't the question. Try again |
I'm trying to parse the question, there's a lot of conditionality and overloads in there...
"would you still have the same view if the season is voided and either PRP uses that technicality to keep the job for another year or he takes us to court because mathematically we could have still been promoted?"
As I see it, what you're asking is:
IF (the season is voided) AND (Lambert wants to stay in post, saying technically he hasn't failed as mathematically we still could be promoted even though Evans wants to sack him using the break clause and Lambert uses the threat of court action to keep his job OR Evans does sack Lambert using the break clause regardless so Lambert takes us to court because mathematically we could have still been promoted)
would we still worship him?
I think TTB1878's reply makes sense - if it doesn't, then which question didn't it answer? | |
| |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 15:08 - Mar 30 with 1599 views | BlueBadger |
| Those of you spellbound by the PR stunts on 15:04 - Mar 30 by Bluefish |
We need a brief interlude every now and again. I've had my fun with the morons for today, I'll be back tomorrow |
Oh Fishers, you've even dropped the Cruncher Gambit here. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
