| FAO Phil Ham 21:08 - Feb 9 with 8285 views | ScottCandage |
It's time.
TWTD MUST come out and call for the sacking or resignation of Paul Lambert. |  | | |  |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:09 - Feb 9 with 3523 views | Swailsey |
Whilst I understand your point, I think given their current situation, it may not be wise.
They did back the EADT’s stance to be fair. [Post edited 9 Feb 2021 21:44]
|  |
| Who said: "Colin Healy made Cesc Fabregas look like Colin Healy"? | We miss you TLA |
| |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:10 - Feb 9 with 3477 views | DanTheMan |
Whilst I'm fairly sure Phil does agree personally, I think given TWTD's situation this would be a bad idea. |  |
| |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:10 - Feb 9 with 3484 views | TieDyedIn95 |
Agreed! |  |
| Football League First Division / Premier League
Champions (1): 1961—62 - Runners-up (2): 1980—81, 1981—82
Football League Second Division / EFL Championship
Champions (3): 1960—61, 1967—68, 1991—92 - Play-off winners (1): 1999—2000
Football League Third Division / EFL League One Champions (2): 1953—54, 1956—57 - Southern League Champions (1): 1936—37
FA Cup Winners (1): 1977—78 - Texaco Cup Winners (1): 1972—73
UEFA Cup / UEFA Europa League Winners (1): 1980—81 | | Poll: | Would you attend a socially distanced training ground protest? |
| |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:10 - Feb 9 with 3444 views | ScottCandage |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:09 - Feb 9 by Swailsey |
Whilst I understand your point, I think given their current situation, it may not be wise.
They did back the EADT’s stance to be fair. [Post edited 9 Feb 2021 21:44]
|
It's not about PL vs. PH. It's about PH saying, for the fans, that it's time for this manager to go. | | | |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:12 - Feb 9 with 3369 views | mo_itfc |
I agree, what's the worst that can happen???
Theres no risk of getting banned... |  |
| |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:12 - Feb 9 with 3360 views | ScottCandage |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:10 - Feb 9 by DanTheMan |
Whilst I'm fairly sure Phil does agree personally, I think given TWTD's situation this would be a bad idea. |
What, Phil's in the room now? No he isn't. And he won't be back while PL is there. But that's not the issue.
This issue is that this manager, by his decisions, does not deserve the support of the fans.
"It's not personal. It's strictly business." - Michael Corleone [Post edited 9 Feb 2021 21:14]
| | | |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:12 - Feb 9 with 3358 views | Kropotkin123 |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:10 - Feb 9 by ScottCandage |
It's not about PL vs. PH. It's about PH saying, for the fans, that it's time for this manager to go. |
I'm sure Phil will take a vocal stance if or when it is required, given the situation he is in. |  |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:13 - Feb 9 with 3337 views | ScottCandage |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:12 - Feb 9 by mo_itfc |
I agree, what's the worst that can happen???
Theres no risk of getting banned... |
Mo has JENGA! | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:13 - Feb 9 with 3307 views | ScottCandage |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:12 - Feb 9 by Kropotkin123 |
I'm sure Phil will take a vocal stance if or when it is required, given the situation he is in. |
And I call on him to do so. | | | |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:15 - Feb 9 with 3243 views | tractordownsouth |
Obviously it's up to Phil and I'll respect his decision but wouldn't this increase his chances of the ban being lifted? I thought he said O'Neill seems quite sympathetic towards his predicament, so with Lambert out of the way that help him get back in. Unless it's Evans decision, but I doubt he deals with that stuff? [Post edited 9 Feb 2021 21:15]
|  |
| |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:18 - Feb 9 with 3165 views | ScottCandage |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:15 - Feb 9 by tractordownsouth |
Obviously it's up to Phil and I'll respect his decision but wouldn't this increase his chances of the ban being lifted? I thought he said O'Neill seems quite sympathetic towards his predicament, so with Lambert out of the way that help him get back in. Unless it's Evans decision, but I doubt he deals with that stuff? [Post edited 9 Feb 2021 21:15]
|
Here's the deal, and IMHO, if you or Phil don't get this, you just won't.
Phil Ham will never be allowed back in Portman Road while Paul Lambert is in charge.
But my request has ZERO to do with that.
I ask Phil Ham to make the call for TWTD (i.e., the fans) to call for Paul Lambert's resignation or sacking because of the poor results on the pitch and the team decisions that Lambert has made or not made. | | | |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:20 - Feb 9 with 3087 views | bluefunk |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:18 - Feb 9 by ScottCandage |
Here's the deal, and IMHO, if you or Phil don't get this, you just won't.
Phil Ham will never be allowed back in Portman Road while Paul Lambert is in charge.
But my request has ZERO to do with that.
I ask Phil Ham to make the call for TWTD (i.e., the fans) to call for Paul Lambert's resignation or sacking because of the poor results on the pitch and the team decisions that Lambert has made or not made. |
You’re shooting at the wrong target here fella, I suggest you leave PH out of this, TWTD is making itself clear if you read the board |  | | |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:20 - Feb 9 with 3040 views | J2BLUE |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:18 - Feb 9 by ScottCandage |
Here's the deal, and IMHO, if you or Phil don't get this, you just won't.
Phil Ham will never be allowed back in Portman Road while Paul Lambert is in charge.
But my request has ZERO to do with that.
I ask Phil Ham to make the call for TWTD (i.e., the fans) to call for Paul Lambert's resignation or sacking because of the poor results on the pitch and the team decisions that Lambert has made or not made. |
Do it yourself. Make a thread. See how many people back it. |  |
| |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:21 - Feb 9 with 3008 views | tractordownsouth |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:18 - Feb 9 by ScottCandage |
Here's the deal, and IMHO, if you or Phil don't get this, you just won't.
Phil Ham will never be allowed back in Portman Road while Paul Lambert is in charge.
But my request has ZERO to do with that.
I ask Phil Ham to make the call for TWTD (i.e., the fans) to call for Paul Lambert's resignation or sacking because of the poor results on the pitch and the team decisions that Lambert has made or not made. |
Yeah that's what I meant. I know your post is obviously for the sake of the club rather than Phil, I was just responding to the others who suggest it might sour relations even more. Unless I've misunderstood it, it seems that more chance of Lambert out is more chance of Phil being allowed back.
Although, as I said it's completely up to him of course. | |
| |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:23 - Feb 9 with 2937 views | N2_Blue |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:18 - Feb 9 by ScottCandage |
Here's the deal, and IMHO, if you or Phil don't get this, you just won't.
Phil Ham will never be allowed back in Portman Road while Paul Lambert is in charge.
But my request has ZERO to do with that.
I ask Phil Ham to make the call for TWTD (i.e., the fans) to call for Paul Lambert's resignation or sacking because of the poor results on the pitch and the team decisions that Lambert has made or not made. |
why would it make any difference?
If Evans doesn't sack PL based on what has happened over the last 3 years why is he going to sack him because Phil Ham says he should.
Evans is a fool. 9 defeats out of 9 to top six sides. No other manager would survive that. But Evans its a tool and no doubt says each week, 'Unlucky Paul, have another go next week' |  |
| |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:24 - Feb 9 with 2904 views | jeera |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:18 - Feb 9 by ScottCandage |
Here's the deal, and IMHO, if you or Phil don't get this, you just won't.
Phil Ham will never be allowed back in Portman Road while Paul Lambert is in charge.
But my request has ZERO to do with that.
I ask Phil Ham to make the call for TWTD (i.e., the fans) to call for Paul Lambert's resignation or sacking because of the poor results on the pitch and the team decisions that Lambert has made or not made. |
It is unlikely that Phil would run a piece demanding for the manager's head.
He might, but that's not his usual style.
More likely to write a piece saying that fans are calling for PL's head as that would be factual rather than his own opinion.
Which, for the umpteenth time, makes his banning even more bewildering. |  |
| |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:24 - Feb 9 with 2892 views | ScottCandage |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:20 - Feb 9 by bluefunk |
You’re shooting at the wrong target here fella, I suggest you leave PH out of this, TWTD is making itself clear if you read the board |
We can talk as individuals or we can talk as one. Only Phil can make that happen. My request remains...
Respectfully, of course :D | | | |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:25 - Feb 9 with 2860 views | ScottCandage |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:21 - Feb 9 by tractordownsouth |
Yeah that's what I meant. I know your post is obviously for the sake of the club rather than Phil, I was just responding to the others who suggest it might sour relations even more. Unless I've misunderstood it, it seems that more chance of Lambert out is more chance of Phil being allowed back.
Although, as I said it's completely up to him of course. |
Again, it's not about Phil vs. Paul. It's about Phil speaking for the fans against a manager who is not getting it done. | | | |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:27 - Feb 9 with 2787 views | ScottCandage |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:23 - Feb 9 by N2_Blue |
why would it make any difference?
If Evans doesn't sack PL based on what has happened over the last 3 years why is he going to sack him because Phil Ham says he should.
Evans is a fool. 9 defeats out of 9 to top six sides. No other manager would survive that. But Evans its a tool and no doubt says each week, 'Unlucky Paul, have another go next week' |
We only do what we can do. I don't dream that Marcus Evans will somehow listen to Phil about firing Paul Lambert. But Phil stating that Lambert should go is the RIGHT THING TO DO!!!
Not sure why this is getting such pushback. | | | |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:29 - Feb 9 with 2731 views | footers |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:25 - Feb 9 by ScottCandage |
Again, it's not about Phil vs. Paul. It's about Phil speaking for the fans against a manager who is not getting it done. |
Why would TWTD take a partisan stance when it never has done before?
The lack of access is already costing the site money, so demanding Phil makes a stance on your behalf is pretty insulting to him, to be honest. |  |
| |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:29 - Feb 9 with 2735 views | N2_Blue |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:25 - Feb 9 by ScottCandage |
Again, it's not about Phil vs. Paul. It's about Phil speaking for the fans against a manager who is not getting it done. |
i don't think you really get it.
It's all very obvious what TWTD thinks. Phil giving his opinion is just one man...one opinion...it would make F all difference | |
| |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:29 - Feb 9 with 2722 views | BlueandTruesince82 |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:09 - Feb 9 by Swailsey |
Whilst I understand your point, I think given their current situation, it may not be wise.
They did back the EADT’s stance to be fair. [Post edited 9 Feb 2021 21:44]
|
Quite... Phil has been clear about his personal opinion so why do more to damage a relationship that we all want TWTD to have with the club.
TWTD splashing a headline will just further get Shambo's back up and might make him dig in.... he won't resign, too much money involved but he might say look Marcus lets thrash out a mutual consent deal |  |
| |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:31 - Feb 9 with 2650 views | ScottCandage |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:29 - Feb 9 by N2_Blue |
i don't think you really get it.
It's all very obvious what TWTD thinks. Phil giving his opinion is just one man...one opinion...it would make F all difference |
I disagree with that. The fact is that Phil has never done such a thing. But he COULD express the feeling of the board in an official statement for the board. | | | |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:31 - Feb 9 with 2637 views | ScottCandage |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:29 - Feb 9 by footers |
Why would TWTD take a partisan stance when it never has done before?
The lack of access is already costing the site money, so demanding Phil makes a stance on your behalf is pretty insulting to him, to be honest. |
Because it has never done so before is why it would have such an impact. | | | |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:32 - Feb 9 with 2606 views | N2_Blue |
| FAO Phil Ham on 21:31 - Feb 9 by ScottCandage |
Because it has never done so before is why it would have such an impact. |
it really wouldn't | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
