| McKenna Fav for Watford Job on 18:40 - May 3 with 1204 views | jaykay |
shouldn't the title for this thread if true , mckenna 2nd fav for watford job |  |
| forensic experts say footers and spruces fingerprints were not found at the scene after the weekends rows |
|  |
| McKenna Fav for Watford Job on 18:43 - May 3 with 1176 views | FrimleyBlue |
| McKenna Fav for Watford Job on 18:08 - May 3 by jeera |
"most people revel in playing the man rather than the ball with Frimley. "
Mate...
His historical posting has been all day today, all day yesterday, the day before...the same points made over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over...
There's now maybe some 60 people who 'disagree' with him.
Some we've never even heard of before have registered accounts just to log on and say how bad it is.
The accusations made by one or two that he is somehow singled out by the same 'few' doesn't stand up - never did really. Those few have now become many. When it reaches thousands will the same argument still be made? |
All day Yesturday and the day before? another just making stuff up for the sake of a post I see.
Jeera, out of interest, as you probably are like all the others in this thead and haven't actually read what I put, what do you actually disagree with?.
Of the posters who actually wanted to discuss things, there's been a good bit of discussion, before it was taken over by the board police to turn it into something it wasnt. Not one of those who jumped into this thread and started again in my direction even bothered to provide any contribution, so again, who fks the board up?, discussions or needless and pointless poster baiting? You're now the 13th poster who hasn't discussed the OP, but jumped in to have your say on something that drives the thread away from what the OP wanted. so well done to you too.
Not 1 person yet has shown how i've had a negative effect in this thread before being baited by the usual group. [Post edited 3 May 2022 18:45]
|  |
| |
| McKenna Fav for Watford Job on 19:00 - May 3 with 1157 views | Ryorry |
| McKenna Fav for Watford Job on 11:50 - May 3 by Churchman |
I did. The state we were in when McK arrived meant I was looking more to the bottom of the table than the top. We had some decent players but not much of a team. The odd really good game and plenty of thrown away points.
The split between the top and bottom half of the table is very unusual and accounts for why so many points were needed to make the play offs. I doubt that’ll be the case next year, though I hope we are chasing 1st, not 6th.
McK has done well. We can see what he is trying to do (as could the Charlton supporters at the last game) and can see where the gaps are, not least goal scorers. With Cook it was a case of get him a coffee before he blows up the players again. All a bit shambolic.
KM won’t leave for Watford. There’s nothing in it for him, bar more money and he doesn’t strike me as the mercenary type. If he does go, well that’s his prerogative and it would tell me he was the wrong person for the job anyway. Nobody is indispensable - that’s partly the reason why putting structure into the club is so important. |
Exactly. KM is far too intelligent & analytical to be lured by the short-term prospect of a higher placed club, & money. If he did go, he wouldn't be half the man I think he is, therefore I wouldn't be too upset at him leaving.
With us it's more difficult for things to go horribly wrong - if he doesn't succeed, well nobody else has here either for 20 years; & if he does he'll be regarded as a miracle worker in achieving what 7 other managers over the past 2 decades have failed to do. And he has the opportunity to really build something special with us here, as did Burley when he came to us as an inexperienced Manager. |  |
| |
| McKenna Fav for Watford Job on 20:28 - May 3 with 1083 views | ArnoldMoorhen |
| McKenna Fav for Watford Job on 12:04 - May 3 by Keno |
This doesnt dispel any of my thoughts that you are in fac a member od royal family
My money is on Princess Anne [Post edited 3 May 2022 12:18]
|
Well seeing as her name means R of York ("Royal of York"?) and that she identifies as a woman, that can only mean Fergie. |  | | |
| Surely McKenna has bought a house and moved his kids into Ipswich schools?! on 20:35 - May 3 with 1068 views | unstableblue |
I’m sure in an interview a while back McKenna stated his kids were finishing this school year in Manchester and moving to local schools and they were getting a family home in Ipswich area?
Once that happens any swift move becomes less less likely |  |
| |
| McKenna Fav for Watford Job on 22:50 - May 3 with 941 views | Ryorry |
| McKenna Fav for Watford Job on 20:28 - May 3 by ArnoldMoorhen |
Well seeing as her name means R of York ("Royal of York"?) and that she identifies as a woman, that can only mean Fergie. |
Thank heavens I'm not - while I'd love to have her dosh and her erstwhile flowing auburn locks, there's literally nothing else about her that I like or would want. | |
| |
| McKenna Fav for Watford Job on 23:57 - May 3 with 892 views | timothyeo |
The managers available for a Championship club right now are fairly limited but there's going to absolutely nothing in Watfords interest, i.e they won't be interested. They have parachute payments and will need to get promoted whilst they're available - no way they're risking it on a manager who's shown a few bright sparks but ultimately has ended Ipswich in midtable in League One with one of the divisions stronger squads available to him.
Equally, the delusion that McKenna wouldn't go for that job is a bit alarming on here. It's like some never learn. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| McKenna Fav for Watford Job on 12:40 - May 4 with 740 views | ArnieM |
| McKenna Fav for Watford Job on 11:50 - May 3 by Churchman |
I did. The state we were in when McK arrived meant I was looking more to the bottom of the table than the top. We had some decent players but not much of a team. The odd really good game and plenty of thrown away points.
The split between the top and bottom half of the table is very unusual and accounts for why so many points were needed to make the play offs. I doubt that’ll be the case next year, though I hope we are chasing 1st, not 6th.
McK has done well. We can see what he is trying to do (as could the Charlton supporters at the last game) and can see where the gaps are, not least goal scorers. With Cook it was a case of get him a coffee before he blows up the players again. All a bit shambolic.
KM won’t leave for Watford. There’s nothing in it for him, bar more money and he doesn’t strike me as the mercenary type. If he does go, well that’s his prerogative and it would tell me he was the wrong person for the job anyway. Nobody is indispensable - that’s partly the reason why putting structure into the club is so important. |
Great post that ^^^^^ and so spot on . |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
