Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. 20:11 - Feb 7 with 2982 views | LeistonBlue | To advertise and sell iFollow audio passes for tonight, despite knowing full well that people could listen to it for free on bbc sounds? Seems like they’re just hoping people don’t notice it’s on bbc and throw away £2.50 for no reason.. |  | | |  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:17 - Feb 7 with 2801 views | Cheltenham_Blue | Every penny counts. |  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:17 - Feb 7 with 2784 views | SitfcB | If people are silly enough to pay that then let them FA Cup commentary always been allowed online etc. |  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:19 - Feb 7 with 2746 views | Ryorry | And then having paid, people found it not working ... |  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:20 - Feb 7 with 2713 views | The_Flashing_Smile | Isn't it just automatically there, and because that's what iFollow offers rather than anything to do with the club specifically? I don't think they've cynically done it. Not seen it "advertised". |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:23 - Feb 7 with 2627 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:20 - Feb 7 by The_Flashing_Smile | Isn't it just automatically there, and because that's what iFollow offers rather than anything to do with the club specifically? I don't think they've cynically done it. Not seen it "advertised". |
I think sometimes people forget the club is a business. I've been loyal to Tesco's for fooking years, I'm still waiting for one of their staff to say to me, "I wouldn't bother if I were you; you can get that cheaper at Morrisons mate" [Post edited 7 Feb 2023 20:32]
|  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:24 - Feb 7 with 2611 views | DJR | And also paying for a product that is not as good as the free Radio Suffolk commentary. |  | |  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:30 - Feb 7 with 2475 views | Garv | Does the audio pass just offer radio commentary or is it Glenn W? |  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:35 - Feb 7 with 2373 views | TheMoralMajority |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:30 - Feb 7 by Garv | Does the audio pass just offer radio commentary or is it Glenn W? |
Most likely Glenn W, so an argument that it is a different product. Also, the only legitimate way for non-UK residents to listen to the game. |  |
| ...but do signatures really work? |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:37 - Feb 7 with 2327 views | Dyland | Not really... isn't it a different commentary team these days? RS is better imo but each to their own. Edit: And as (the welcome return of) Majorers notes, it's for overseas as well. [Post edited 7 Feb 2023 20:45]
|  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:44 - Feb 7 with 2203 views | Illinoisblue |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:30 - Feb 7 by Garv | Does the audio pass just offer radio commentary or is it Glenn W? |
It’s not GW - he tweeted he couldn’t get time off work to make it to the game. (Legit, not making that up) |  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:46 - Feb 7 with 2122 views | Garv |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:35 - Feb 7 by TheMoralMajority | Most likely Glenn W, so an argument that it is a different product. Also, the only legitimate way for non-UK residents to listen to the game. |
Yep. Not cheeky at all really. |  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:53 - Feb 7 with 2025 views | Swansea_Blue | It’s probably more lazy than cheeky. There’s a service and it’s running as normal. Nobody’s probably had the time or thought to disrupt the system (should have got Banksy on the case!) and point people to the Beeb instead. That could have been a bit of detail that had earned them some credit, but probably not a lot and it not that important. Most people would know it’s on the Beeb I’d have thought. |  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:56 - Feb 7 with 1970 views | LeistonBlue |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:35 - Feb 7 by TheMoralMajority | Most likely Glenn W, so an argument that it is a different product. Also, the only legitimate way for non-UK residents to listen to the game. |
Pretty sure you can listen to bbc sounds abroad, no? |  | |  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:59 - Feb 7 with 1940 views | TheMoralMajority |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:56 - Feb 7 by LeistonBlue | Pretty sure you can listen to bbc sounds abroad, no? |
Nope, football matches are blocked internationally [Post edited 7 Feb 2023 20:59]
|  |
| ...but do signatures really work? |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 21:04 - Feb 7 with 1874 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:53 - Feb 7 by Swansea_Blue | It’s probably more lazy than cheeky. There’s a service and it’s running as normal. Nobody’s probably had the time or thought to disrupt the system (should have got Banksy on the case!) and point people to the Beeb instead. That could have been a bit of detail that had earned them some credit, but probably not a lot and it not that important. Most people would know it’s on the Beeb I’d have thought. |
Also, I don't think iFollow would take too kindly to the club advertising another (free) service instead of the one they're contracted to. |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 21:04 - Feb 7 with 1877 views | WicklowBlue |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:59 - Feb 7 by TheMoralMajority | Nope, football matches are blocked internationally [Post edited 7 Feb 2023 20:59]
|
Indeed geolocked to UK only. A short trip on VPN Airlines would resolve thought I would think. |  | |  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 21:15 - Feb 7 with 1767 views | Ryorry |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 21:04 - Feb 7 by WicklowBlue | Indeed geolocked to UK only. A short trip on VPN Airlines would resolve thought I would think. |
But it was because I'd fallen asleep in The Netherlands that I found I couldn't get the RS comm online - just kept getting audio message that comm wasn't available "for contractual reasons". Took the fastest ever flight back to Blighty for me to get dear ol Brenners dulcet tones 😂 [Post edited 7 Feb 2023 21:15]
|  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 21:20 - Feb 7 with 1712 views | TheMoralMajority |
Oh, it does, certainly. However iFollow is the only legitimate way to access comms overseas [Post edited 7 Feb 2023 21:20]
|  |
| ...but do signatures really work? |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 21:25 - Feb 7 with 1656 views | DJR |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 21:20 - Feb 7 by TheMoralMajority | Oh, it does, certainly. However iFollow is the only legitimate way to access comms overseas [Post edited 7 Feb 2023 21:20]
|
It may not strictly be legitimate but a Brit abroad listening to football commentary isn't, so far as I am aware, depriving anyone of any revenues, given there won't be a local football commentary on the game. EDIT: Actually that's wrong. I suppose I-follow is being deprived of the revenue. [Post edited 7 Feb 2023 21:27]
|  | |  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 21:27 - Feb 7 with 1626 views | TheMoralMajority |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 21:25 - Feb 7 by DJR | It may not strictly be legitimate but a Brit abroad listening to football commentary isn't, so far as I am aware, depriving anyone of any revenues, given there won't be a local football commentary on the game. EDIT: Actually that's wrong. I suppose I-follow is being deprived of the revenue. [Post edited 7 Feb 2023 21:27]
|
You get no arguments from me. Regional blocks in a globalized internet make zero sense. It's an antiquated model. |  |
| ...but do signatures really work? |
|  |
| |