| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) 20:06 - Nov 3 with 7849 views | gainsboroughblue |
|  |
| |  |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:18 - Nov 3 with 2173 views | gainsboroughblue |
0-1 | |
| |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:19 - Nov 3 with 2145 views | Steve_M |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:18 - Nov 3 by gainsboroughblue |
0-1 |
Leeds have been the better side all game I think. |  |
| |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:19 - Nov 3 with 2129 views | Scuzzer |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:18 - Nov 3 by gainsboroughblue |
0-1 |
To be fair they've been the better team.
Come on Foxes...get something out of nothing. |  |
| |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:21 - Nov 3 with 2078 views | ArchiRob |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:17 - Nov 3 by gainsboroughblue |
ArchiRob.
Why the downvote? [Post edited 3 Nov 2023 21:18]
|
Accident sorry Fat fingers on my phone it's a shame we can't address the mistakes |  |
| |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:21 - Nov 3 with 2076 views | bournemouthblue |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:19 - Nov 3 by Steve_M |
Leeds have been the better side all game I think. |
They look far more lively and able to fashion something with some creative flair
Leicester very one dimensional but clearly well organised and solid defensively, most sides at this level will lack the quality to unlock Leicester |  |
| |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:23 - Nov 3 with 2051 views | gainsboroughblue |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:19 - Nov 3 by Scuzzer |
To be fair they've been the better team.
Come on Foxes...get something out of nothing. |
We prefer three way promotion tussles anyway.
Don't we? | |
| |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:23 - Nov 3 with 2039 views | gainsboroughblue |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:21 - Nov 3 by ArchiRob |
Accident sorry Fat fingers on my phone it's a shame we can't address the mistakes |
I think you can cancel it out by just tapping the uppie. | |
| |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:23 - Nov 3 with 2033 views | Churchman |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:19 - Nov 3 by Scuzzer |
To be fair they've been the better team.
Come on Foxes...get something out of nothing. |
Agreed, they’ve been on the front foot, dominating the pace of the game and that forward line still looks lethal.
Leicester look oddly lethargic at the moment. Long way to go. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:24 - Nov 3 with 2025 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 20:10 - Nov 3 by gainsboroughblue |
I'm sure Leicester will come into it. The fact we are sandwiched between these teams in the table is amazing really. |
Saw this stat today comparing last season in the Championship to this.
Leicester are 14 points better off than Burnley were and we will be 12 points better off if we win our game in hand.
It shows what a stupendous start both us and Leicester have made |  | | |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:29 - Nov 3 with 1966 views | Chrisd |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:19 - Nov 3 by Steve_M |
Leeds have been the better side all game I think. |
Certainly deserve that lead. Leeds are very impressive on the counter attack. |  |
| |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:32 - Nov 3 with 1946 views | bournemouthblue |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:23 - Nov 3 by Churchman |
Agreed, they’ve been on the front foot, dominating the pace of the game and that forward line still looks lethal.
Leicester look oddly lethargic at the moment. Long way to go. |
From the past games I have seen on TV, their tempo is often quite slow around the back, they're quite conservative really and rely on their wingers to do a lot of the work
Dewsbury-Hall often looks a class above but he hasn't been able to get through the middle | |
| |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:32 - Nov 3 with 1943 views | gainsboroughblue |
Leicester waking up a bit but Leeds really impressive.
If we finish above one of these teams, it will be an incredible achievement. | |
| |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:32 - Nov 3 with 1947 views | Illinoisblue |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:19 - Nov 3 by Steve_M |
Leeds have been the better side all game I think. |
Agreed. And a Leeds win brings into play the potential return of banter era horrors and being pipped to autos by scummer Farke. Shudder |  |
| |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:35 - Nov 3 with 1898 views | gainsboroughblue |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:32 - Nov 3 by Illinoisblue |
Agreed. And a Leeds win brings into play the potential return of banter era horrors and being pipped to autos by scummer Farke. Shudder |
Needing close on 100 points in doing so too. | |
| |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:44 - Nov 3 with 1816 views | SWBlue22 |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:18 - Nov 3 by gainsboroughblue |
0-1 |
Season over |  | | |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:48 - Nov 3 with 1779 views | ArnieM |
Just looked back on our stats v Leeds
7shots on target ( Leeds 7 shots on target)
3shots off target ( Leeds 1shot off target)
Leicester tonight 0 shots on target ( Leeds 6shots on target)
Leicester 2shots off target ( Leeds 2 shots off target)
We should beat Leicester in Dec |  |
| |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:49 - Nov 3 with 1760 views | SWBlue22 |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:32 - Nov 3 by Illinoisblue |
Agreed. And a Leeds win brings into play the potential return of banter era horrors and being pipped to autos by scummer Farke. Shudder |
False sense of security etc. maybe your right. | | | |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:54 - Nov 3 with 1698 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:48 - Nov 3 by ArnieM |
Just looked back on our stats v Leeds
7shots on target ( Leeds 7 shots on target)
3shots off target ( Leeds 1shot off target)
Leicester tonight 0 shots on target ( Leeds 6shots on target)
Leicester 2shots off target ( Leeds 2 shots off target)
We should beat Leicester in Dec |
Their wingers scare me tbh.. esp their right winger. Davis had a torrid time recently v whittaker |  |
| |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:59 - Nov 3 with 1607 views | Steve_M |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:48 - Nov 3 by ArnieM |
Just looked back on our stats v Leeds
7shots on target ( Leeds 7 shots on target)
3shots off target ( Leeds 1shot off target)
Leicester tonight 0 shots on target ( Leeds 6shots on target)
Leicester 2shots off target ( Leeds 2 shots off target)
We should beat Leicester in Dec |
Leeds have looked really solid tonight but clearly they weren’t against us nir many games this season. Took on3 great save at the end to win it though.
Let everyone talk Leeds up and us down, suits us. | |
| |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:59 - Nov 3 with 1604 views | Eireannach_gorm |
the one result we could have done without. |  | | |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 22:00 - Nov 3 with 1593 views | BondiBlue |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:54 - Nov 3 by FrimleyBlue |
Their wingers scare me tbh.. esp their right winger. Davis had a torrid time recently v whittaker |
I thought that for the first half hour or so but then they just kept doing the same thing for the next hour. Very predictable. They also gave the striker zero service.
Only reason whittaker scored v us was because davis was trying to get back in position instead of covering for edmundson at CB. | |
| |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 22:01 - Nov 3 with 1575 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 22:00 - Nov 3 by BondiBlue |
I thought that for the first half hour or so but then they just kept doing the same thing for the next hour. Very predictable. They also gave the striker zero service.
Only reason whittaker scored v us was because davis was trying to get back in position instead of covering for edmundson at CB. |
True. But he also got done again for their 3rd goal. Can't remember the winger at that point.
It's not his strong point imo. | |
| |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 22:01 - Nov 3 with 1576 views | fistpumpfury |
Carry on as we are and we’re promoted. Simples👍 Uppa Towen |  | | |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 22:01 - Nov 3 with 1580 views | gainsboroughblue |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 21:59 - Nov 3 by Eireannach_gorm |
the one result we could have done without. |
Thing is, we won't know that for sure until May.
There were games last year we said we could do with so and so getting a result at such and such. Turned out in hindsight, it worked in our favour.
i.e. Barnsley beating Sheff Wed. | |
| |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 22:10 - Nov 3 with 1502 views | Churchman |
| Leeds could/should be 2 up already (n/t) on 22:00 - Nov 3 by BondiBlue |
I thought that for the first half hour or so but then they just kept doing the same thing for the next hour. Very predictable. They also gave the striker zero service.
Only reason whittaker scored v us was because davis was trying to get back in position instead of covering for edmundson at CB. |
The main reason Whittaker scored was because it was a brilliant goal. The Leicester lad hit the bar doing something pretty similar and sometimes you just have to put your hand up.
Leeds deserved the win. Leicester sort of run out of ideas while Leeds looked dangerous when they attacked and stopped rolling around. Leicester, like us, used a lot of short corners tonight with a similar result. Zilch. Why??
Would a draw or a home win have been a better result for us? Probably but that depends on what we do in the next couple of games. It also assumes we cannot finish above Leicester. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
