| So no new striker for tomorrow 12:32 - Jan 12 with 1836 views | ChampionsofInnsbruck |
I believe we’ve passed the deadline. I think he’ll start Jackson rather than Ladapo. I know some fans are calling for Broadhead to play that position but I can’t see McKenna doing that myself. |  | | |  |
| So no new striker for tomorrow on 12:34 - Jan 12 with 1787 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
I'd say it depends what they've been doing, and what's been working, in training. |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| So no new striker for tomorrow on 12:46 - Jan 12 with 1684 views | Keno |
could still bring a loan player in |  |
| |
| So no new striker for tomorrow on 12:48 - Jan 12 with 1659 views | textbackup |
The Sunderland defence might as well play in slippers |  |
| |
| So no new striker for tomorrow on 12:56 - Jan 12 with 1614 views | homer_123 |
| So no new striker for tomorrow on 12:48 - Jan 12 by textbackup |
The Sunderland defence might as well play in slippers |
That's the spirit. |  |
| |
| They might as well get on the spirits. (n/t) on 12:57 - Jan 12 with 1595 views | Bloots |
| So no new striker for tomorrow on 12:56 - Jan 12 by homer_123 |
That's the spirit. |
|  |
| "Great to see you back on here mate, I was considering deactivating my account if you hadn’t returned" - TWTD User (Aug 2025) |
| |
| So no new striker for tomorrow on 13:00 - Jan 12 with 1552 views | textbackup |
| So no new striker for tomorrow on 12:56 - Jan 12 by homer_123 |
That's the spirit. |
I’ll join you on them if you’re confident… | |
| |
| So no new striker for tomorrow on 13:26 - Jan 12 with 1476 views | TrumptonBlue |
This sort of situation calls for Micky Stockwell. |  | | |
| So no new striker for tomorrow on 13:32 - Jan 12 with 1431 views | the_toff |
It was unlikely that a player is going to join today and start tomorrow, regardless of any deadline.
We've got a lot of attacking options, not least Chaplin, Broadhead, Burns, Sarmiento and Hutchinson. There's a very evident George Hirst shaped hole in terms of a natural and obvious #9 who can operate as the focal point, but I still think we've got enough about us to cause problems tomorrow night. I would imagine Jackson will start. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| So no new striker for tomorrow on 13:52 - Jan 12 with 1352 views | Bobbychase |
Any chance, if we don't sign someone, that people get behind the players selected seeing as we are second, and very good at home, rather than moaning and booing because they are sulking over the team selection.
I know it feels a bit like asking the tide not to come in.
But still |  |
| |
| So no new striker for tomorrow on 14:17 - Jan 12 with 1270 views | durhamj |
| So no new striker for tomorrow on 13:26 - Jan 12 by TrumptonBlue |
This sort of situation calls for Micky Stockwell. |
Mr Reliable. | | | |
| So no new striker for tomorrow on 14:47 - Jan 12 with 1169 views | jimmyvet |
| So no new striker for tomorrow on 12:48 - Jan 12 by textbackup |
The Sunderland defence might as well play in slippers |
Imagine being the type of moron who would want your team, who are sitting second in the table to do badly…. Sad person. | | | |
| So no new striker for tomorrow on 14:50 - Jan 12 with 1142 views | textbackup |
| So no new striker for tomorrow on 14:47 - Jan 12 by jimmyvet |
Imagine being the type of moron who would want your team, who are sitting second in the table to do badly…. Sad person. |
Where did I say I wanted us to do badly?
I’ll be as excited as you if we win… but if the last few games are anything to go by, our striking options are weak as piss… but apparently stating the obvious means I’m sad. | |
| |
| So no new striker for tomorrow on 16:50 - Jan 12 with 982 views | BlueForYou |
McKenna might need to understand that he needs to adapt & try something different. There are options which give us strike power. We'll see. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
