Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. 17:06 - Oct 26 with 2913 viewsArnoldMoorhen

The referee gave the free kick, so unless that was a clear and obvious error, why are they looking at what happened later?
0
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:07 - Oct 26 with 2878 viewsZx1988

VAR has always been able to adjudicate on whether a foul on the edge of the area constitutes a FK or a pen.

You ain't a beauty but, hey, you're alright.
Poll: Stone Island - immediate associations

2
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:07 - Oct 26 with 2876 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

Stop clutching at straws.

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

1
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:08 - Oct 26 with 2819 viewsArnieM

Biased officials . I'm sick to.the back teeth of this division.

Poll: Would this current Town team beat the current narwich team

0
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:08 - Oct 26 with 2794 viewsAlberto_the_frog

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:07 - Oct 26 by Marshalls_Mullet

Stop clutching at straws.


It was outside the area and correctly given as so. VAR should have had nothing to do with it
1
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:09 - Oct 26 with 2743 viewsZx1988

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:08 - Oct 26 by Alberto_the_frog

It was outside the area and correctly given as so. VAR should have had nothing to do with it


The first foul was, but then Clarke decided he wanted to haul him down once they got into the area.

You ain't a beauty but, hey, you're alright.
Poll: Stone Island - immediate associations

2
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:10 - Oct 26 with 2709 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:08 - Oct 26 by Alberto_the_frog

It was outside the area and correctly given as so. VAR should have had nothing to do with it


Continued into the area.

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

1
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:10 - Oct 26 with 2673 viewspointofblue

The penalty was a penalty. Whether the ball should have been there after the ref gave a free kick against Phillips for a perfect tackle in the build up...

Poll: Who would you play at right centre back on Saturday?

0
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:12 - Oct 26 with 2621 viewsGlasgowBlue

Stop blaming VAR. Their goal was onside and Clarke's foul was a penalty.

Hey now, hey now, don't dream it's over
Poll: What will be announced first?
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

1
Login to get fewer ads

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:14 - Oct 26 with 2554 viewsDavoIPB

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:12 - Oct 26 by GlasgowBlue

Stop blaming VAR. Their goal was onside and Clarke's foul was a penalty.


Except it wasn't.
0
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:15 - Oct 26 with 2529 viewsZx1988

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:14 - Oct 26 by DavoIPB

Except it wasn't.


Except it was.

You'd be fuming if the tables had been turned, and all we'd got was a FK there.

You ain't a beauty but, hey, you're alright.
Poll: Stone Island - immediate associations

0
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:26 - Oct 26 with 2388 viewsArnoldMoorhen

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:15 - Oct 26 by Zx1988

Except it was.

You'd be fuming if the tables had been turned, and all we'd got was a FK there.


The referee didn't agree with you.

He, correctly, gave a free kick for the initial elbow in the throat.

That wasn't a clear and obvious error, because it was correct.

Lewis-Potter then pushed himself across Clarke, then down, when the elbow/arm had been pushing him away.

That's how I saw it, having seen all the angles.
1
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:28 - Oct 26 with 2334 viewsPinewoodblue

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:12 - Oct 26 by GlasgowBlue

Stop blaming VAR. Their goal was onside and Clarke's foul was a penalty.


If the referee decided to give a free kick for the initial contact, outside the box, then the ball would not be in play when any subsequent contact inside the box.

VAR got it wrong.

At least 7 goals, a sending off and VAR to discuss should get a good number of minutes coverage on MOTD.

2023 year of destiny
Poll: Dickhead "Noun" a stupid, irritating, or ridiculous man.

0
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:47 - Oct 26 with 2198 viewsGlasgowBlue

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:14 - Oct 26 by DavoIPB

Except it wasn't.


The referee didn't blow up when they were tussling outside the area. He blew up when Clarked dragged their player down. That happened in the area. The ref made a error and VAR checked it. When the referee viewed the footage he agreed with VAR.

Hey now, hey now, don't dream it's over
Poll: What will be announced first?
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

0
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:48 - Oct 26 with 2178 viewsGlasgowBlue

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:26 - Oct 26 by ArnoldMoorhen

The referee didn't agree with you.

He, correctly, gave a free kick for the initial elbow in the throat.

That wasn't a clear and obvious error, because it was correct.

Lewis-Potter then pushed himself across Clarke, then down, when the elbow/arm had been pushing him away.

That's how I saw it, having seen all the angles.


The why didn't the referee stand by his initial decision when viewing the replay?

Hey now, hey now, don't dream it's over
Poll: What will be announced first?
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

0
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:49 - Oct 26 with 2163 viewsGlasgowBlue

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:28 - Oct 26 by Pinewoodblue

If the referee decided to give a free kick for the initial contact, outside the box, then the ball would not be in play when any subsequent contact inside the box.

VAR got it wrong.

At least 7 goals, a sending off and VAR to discuss should get a good number of minutes coverage on MOTD.


He didn't. Watch the replay. The ref blows when the Brentford player is brought down, not during the initial contact. I've watched it several times.

Hey now, hey now, don't dream it's over
Poll: What will be announced first?
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

0
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:51 - Oct 26 with 2143 viewsnaa

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:47 - Oct 26 by GlasgowBlue

The referee didn't blow up when they were tussling outside the area. He blew up when Clarked dragged their player down. That happened in the area. The ref made a error and VAR checked it. When the referee viewed the footage he agreed with VAR.


Except the referee wasn't shown it again so didn't get a chance to agree or not.

If there was a foul outside the box it can't be a penalty. You don't give the deco from where it finished, it is from where it started.
0
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:52 - Oct 26 with 2135 viewsibbleobble

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:07 - Oct 26 by Marshalls_Mullet

Stop clutching at straws.


He’s not. The foul, if it was even that was committed out of the box. Just because they collapsed into each other doesn’t make it a pen. He’s stating the obvious not that it discounts yet another Muric howler.
0
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 18:03 - Oct 26 with 2068 viewsGlasgowBlue

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:51 - Oct 26 by naa

Except the referee wasn't shown it again so didn't get a chance to agree or not.

If there was a foul outside the box it can't be a penalty. You don't give the deco from where it finished, it is from where it started.


The ref went over to the screen and watched the replay and agreed it was a penalty.

Watch the replay. He doesn't blow for a foul until Clarke hauls their player down, which is in the box.

https://www.skysports.com/football/video/19530/13242008/brentford-4-3-ipswich-to

Hey now, hey now, don't dream it's over
Poll: What will be announced first?
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

0
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 19:23 - Oct 26 with 1910 viewsReus30

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 18:03 - Oct 26 by GlasgowBlue

The ref went over to the screen and watched the replay and agreed it was a penalty.

Watch the replay. He doesn't blow for a foul until Clarke hauls their player down, which is in the box.

https://www.skysports.com/football/video/19530/13242008/brentford-4-3-ipswich-to


My stream didn't show him going to the screen? I thought he was just told it was in the box and pointed.

I still disagree with it, very soft. Clarke's last week was more of a pen.
0
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 22:50 - Oct 26 with 1586 viewsArnoldMoorhen

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:48 - Oct 26 by GlasgowBlue

The why didn't the referee stand by his initial decision when viewing the replay?


I think the referee didn't view the replay. He was told it was a penalty by the VAR crew, and gave it without looking at the monitor. If I am right about that it is another bizarre aspect of it.
0
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 22:52 - Oct 26 with 1576 viewsArnoldMoorhen

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 19:23 - Oct 26 by Reus30

My stream didn't show him going to the screen? I thought he was just told it was in the box and pointed.

I still disagree with it, very soft. Clarke's last week was more of a pen.


That's what I saw live, too. Premier League stream.

The referee was over by the penalty area when he heard something on his earpiece, then gave the penalty.
0
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 22:54 - Oct 26 with 1560 viewslazyblue

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:07 - Oct 26 by Zx1988

VAR has always been able to adjudicate on whether a foul on the edge of the area constitutes a FK or a pen.


It was a penalty wether we like it or not , Clarke brought him down in the area .
-1
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 08:12 - Oct 27 with 1295 viewsParamedic

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 17:07 - Oct 26 by Zx1988

VAR has always been able to adjudicate on whether a foul on the edge of the area constitutes a FK or a pen.


The way I saw it the initial foul started outside the box. Therefore a free kick should have been awarded outside of the box. Harry Clarke second yellow was also questionable. Looks like he played the ball, but however if it was slightly mid timed was the offence worthy of a yellow card. I’ve seen worse fouls during the game that didn’t result in bookings. Guess we just have to take it on the chin.

AllalallalSunderland

0
12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 08:24 - Oct 27 with 1257 viewsITFC_Forever

12 (well, 14 with the VAR crew) man Brentford hold on against 10 man Ipswich. on 18:03 - Oct 26 by GlasgowBlue

The ref went over to the screen and watched the replay and agreed it was a penalty.

Watch the replay. He doesn't blow for a foul until Clarke hauls their player down, which is in the box.

https://www.skysports.com/football/video/19530/13242008/brentford-4-3-ipswich-to


The ref didn’t go to the screen. He stood by the ball and was told what to do in his earpiece.

P 1162, W 506, D 298, L 358, F 1749, A 1435 92/92
Blog: Confessions of a Statto - Why We Bother

0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025