| Five at the back tomorrow, Clarke at RWB? 16:53 - Dec 2 with 1888 views | Bellevue_Blue |
Delap
J.Clarke - Hutchinson
Cajuste - Morsy
Davis - Greaves - Burgess - O'Shea - H.Clarke
Muric
With Axel out I wouldn't be against going with a more defensive back 5. Get Greaves back in and Clarke can contribute going forward. |  | | |  |
| Five at the back tomorrow, Clarke at RWB? on 16:54 - Dec 2 with 1877 views | bournemouthblue |
It's definitely worth a look |  |
| |
| Five at the back tomorrow, Clarke at RWB? on 16:56 - Dec 2 with 1855 views | JammyDodgerrr |
As ever, when these threads come up, we are not going to change the shape or formation that we've played with almost exclusively for the past few years. It will be the same shape as always. |  |
| |
| Five at the back tomorrow, Clarke at RWB? on 17:34 - Dec 2 with 1754 views | pointofblue |
| Five at the back tomorrow, Clarke at RWB? on 16:56 - Dec 2 by JammyDodgerrr |
As ever, when these threads come up, we are not going to change the shape or formation that we've played with almost exclusively for the past few years. It will be the same shape as always. |
Those there comes a point where it becomes stubborn as it's to our detriment.
I just hope Johnson is fit enough to play. | |
| |
| Five at the back tomorrow, Clarke at RWB? on 17:39 - Dec 2 with 1724 views | SomethingBlue |
Not at home against Palace. | |
| |
| Five at the back tomorrow, Clarke at RWB? on 17:42 - Dec 2 with 1713 views | gainsboroughblue |
Doubt very much we will, at home anyway. But these injuries are really p1ssing me off now. We really can't afford any more of them. |  |
| |
| Five at the back tomorrow, Clarke at RWB? on 17:56 - Dec 2 with 1630 views | pointofblue |
| Five at the back tomorrow, Clarke at RWB? on 17:42 - Dec 2 by gainsboroughblue |
Doubt very much we will, at home anyway. But these injuries are really p1ssing me off now. We really can't afford any more of them. |
And who as well. If we lose Delap we really are in trouble. But, out of the backline, a lack of Tuanzebe was really exposed in the three games he missed. Johnson was showing promise before he picked up a further injury. Part of me feels take the pain tomorrow if he's not 100% and ensure he is fully fit before playing him. Because if he aggravates something and misses more matches because of it... | |
| |
| Five at the back tomorrow, Clarke at RWB? on 19:09 - Dec 2 with 1476 views | FrimleyBlue |
| Five at the back tomorrow, Clarke at RWB? on 16:56 - Dec 2 by JammyDodgerrr |
As ever, when these threads come up, we are not going to change the shape or formation that we've played with almost exclusively for the past few years. It will be the same shape as always. |
What like v spurs away. That was 5 4 1 off the ball and 3 4 3 on the ball. |  |
| |
| Five at the back tomorrow, Clarke at RWB? on 02:31 - Dec 3 with 1172 views | madmouse1959 |
Muric
Clarke. Burgess. O Shea. Townsend
Hutchinson. Cajuste. Morsey. Leif Davis
Delap. Broadhead/Clarke/ or other ? |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Five at the back tomorrow, Clarke at RWB? on 09:14 - Dec 3 with 930 views | Rimsy |
I've said all season we should go five at the back. Davis plays more as a winger anyway and it leaves us short at the back against good teams. O'Shea, Greaves and Burgess is a solid base. |  |
| |
| Five at the back tomorrow, Clarke at RWB? on 09:17 - Dec 3 with 923 views | TRUE_BLUE123 |
Wouldn't be against it.
Rather Burns at RWB than Clarke though. Hope he proves me wrong but I just do not rate Clarke at all. |  |
| |
| Five at the back tomorrow, Clarke at RWB? on 09:23 - Dec 3 with 885 views | DanTheMan |
| Five at the back tomorrow, Clarke at RWB? on 19:09 - Dec 2 by FrimleyBlue |
What like v spurs away. That was 5 4 1 off the ball and 3 4 3 on the ball. |
We've done that a lot this season, not just in the Spurs game. Definitely did it against Villa. |  |
| |
| Five at the back tomorrow, Clarke at RWB? on 09:24 - Dec 3 with 880 views | Bellevue_Blue |
| Five at the back tomorrow, Clarke at RWB? on 16:56 - Dec 2 by JammyDodgerrr |
As ever, when these threads come up, we are not going to change the shape or formation that we've played with almost exclusively for the past few years. It will be the same shape as always. |
The shape is flexible enough to morph into either but certainly against City & Spurs we have played more of a back 5.
Ben Johnson certainly wasn't playing RW! | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
