| 5 game ban for Cunha 15:53 - Dec 27 with 4271 views | EJP |
Shame they didn't do it two games ago .. |  | | |  |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 15:55 - Dec 27 with 4232 views | MaySixth |
That will help us.
Wolves new manager bubble will burst soon as well. |  |
| |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 15:55 - Dec 27 with 4221 views | baxterbasics |
Every little helps! Nice late Christmas present. |  |
| |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 15:56 - Dec 27 with 4180 views | FrimleyBlue |
Is that confirmed. Some sources on x says it was from a fake account. |  |
| |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 15:57 - Dec 27 with 4209 views | EJP |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 15:56 - Dec 27 by FrimleyBlue |
Is that confirmed. Some sources on x says it was from a fake account. |
I was going by TheAthletic posting it ... but will now go and double-check!
Edit: TheAthletic were tagged and hadn't posted it, Daily Mail however is running with the story.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sp [Post edited 27 Dec 2024 15:59]
| | | |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 16:01 - Dec 27 with 4071 views | Chris_ITFC |
Was always going to be more than 3 - that’s why it was delayed (for a decision). |  |
| |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 16:02 - Dec 27 with 4068 views | EJP |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 15:57 - Dec 27 by EJP |
I was going by TheAthletic posting it ... but will now go and double-check!
Edit: TheAthletic were tagged and hadn't posted it, Daily Mail however is running with the story.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sp [Post edited 27 Dec 2024 15:59]
|
And now the Daily Mail have updated their story to say he's in "limbo", so I guess it isn't confirmed.
Sorry all. (I hate the internet at times, and my point about banning him two matches ago still stands!) | | | |
| 5 game ban for Cunha (Edit to title Unconfirmed, so ignore!) (n/t) on 16:02 - Dec 27 with 4045 views | EJP |
| | | |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 16:07 - Dec 27 with 3955 views | GeoffSentence |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 15:56 - Dec 27 by FrimleyBlue |
Is that confirmed. Some sources on x says it was from a fake account. |
Yeah, all I have seen is spoofs where Cunha is putting the glasses back on, with the tagline '5 game ban for this' |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 16:16 - Dec 27 with 3796 views | redrickstuhaart |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 16:07 - Dec 27 by GeoffSentence |
Yeah, all I have seen is spoofs where Cunha is putting the glasses back on, with the tagline '5 game ban for this' |
There is a continued theme in the media of only mentioning that bit, rather than the nasty blindside elbow. |  |
| |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 16:18 - Dec 27 with 3770 views | CrayonKing |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 15:57 - Dec 27 by EJP |
I was going by TheAthletic posting it ... but will now go and double-check!
Edit: TheAthletic were tagged and hadn't posted it, Daily Mail however is running with the story.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sp [Post edited 27 Dec 2024 15:59]
|
The Athletic are also reporting it now. 4 prem games plus the FA cup game.
Edit: The story has been taken down now! [Post edited 27 Dec 2024 17:44]
|  | | |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 16:21 - Dec 27 with 3713 views | baxterbasics |
Even if it proves not true or something less, the one silver lining is there's lots of whisperings he's getting poached in January. | |
| |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 16:25 - Dec 27 with 3669 views | Swansea_Blue |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 16:18 - Dec 27 by CrayonKing |
The Athletic are also reporting it now. 4 prem games plus the FA cup game.
Edit: The story has been taken down now! [Post edited 27 Dec 2024 17:44]
|
Shame there’s an FA Cup match in that 5, but is what it is. 4 league games is better than nothing. If they lose him in Jan though that would be even better. |  |
| |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 16:28 - Dec 27 with 3601 views | Pinewoodblue |
We will never know how many points less Wolves would have had they not contested the charge. Hopefully missing 4 league games, plus it seems as FA cup game, will impact heavily on Wolves.
Assume, had the charge not been contested, it would only have been a 2 or 3 league games ban. |  |
| |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 16:31 - Dec 27 with 3555 views | redrickstuhaart |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 16:28 - Dec 27 by Pinewoodblue |
We will never know how many points less Wolves would have had they not contested the charge. Hopefully missing 4 league games, plus it seems as FA cup game, will impact heavily on Wolves.
Assume, had the charge not been contested, it would only have been a 2 or 3 league games ban. |
All the reports which come up on google have been removed. | |
| |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 16:35 - Dec 27 with 3498 views | Churchman |
Hands up, I thought he’d get away with it. Question is, if an FA Cup game is included why? They wouldn’t have played him anyway. |  | | |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 17:27 - Dec 27 with 3011 views | FrimleyBlue |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 16:35 - Dec 27 by Churchman |
Hands up, I thought he’d get away with it. Question is, if an FA Cup game is included why? They wouldn’t have played him anyway. |
It's a competitive fixure so it has to count | |
| |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 17:34 - Dec 27 with 2975 views | Oldsmoker |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 16:18 - Dec 27 by CrayonKing |
The Athletic are also reporting it now. 4 prem games plus the FA cup game.
Edit: The story has been taken down now! [Post edited 27 Dec 2024 17:44]
|
Soft. |  |
| |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 17:42 - Dec 27 with 2858 views | backwaywhen |
False news Wolves still waiting to hear according to their official website. | | | |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 17:49 - Dec 27 with 2761 views | CrayonKing |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 17:42 - Dec 27 by backwaywhen |
False news Wolves still waiting to hear according to their official website. |
Just checked and The Athletic have removed the story now.
Hopefully it will now be longer than 5 games but probably just a case of someone jumping the gun and posting the story before it became official. | | | |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 17:52 - Dec 27 with 2726 views | redrickstuhaart |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 17:49 - Dec 27 by CrayonKing |
Just checked and The Athletic have removed the story now.
Hopefully it will now be longer than 5 games but probably just a case of someone jumping the gun and posting the story before it became official. |
5 sounds about right from an FA perspective.
I would say that assaulting someone, to the head, from behind, without warning or provocation was more serious than that. | |
| |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 17:56 - Dec 27 with 2672 views | CrayonKing |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 17:52 - Dec 27 by redrickstuhaart |
5 sounds about right from an FA perspective.
I would say that assaulting someone, to the head, from behind, without warning or provocation was more serious than that. |
completely agree with that. After the end of the game and on non-participant is an assault not a "match incident" and should have a much harsher penalty. But the FA is gonna FA... | | | |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 18:04 - Dec 27 with 2536 views | redrickstuhaart |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 17:56 - Dec 27 by CrayonKing |
completely agree with that. After the end of the game and on non-participant is an assault not a "match incident" and should have a much harsher penalty. But the FA is gonna FA... |
Precisely. Though hard to say, in principle, why it is different to the old Cantona incident for instance. | |
| |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 18:43 - Dec 27 with 2147 views | bournemouthblue |
Imagine if he gets a 5 game ban and then is sold, meaning Wolves have not been punished at all |  |
| |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 18:49 - Dec 27 with 2052 views | JammyDodgerrr |
| 5 game ban for Cunha on 18:43 - Dec 27 by bournemouthblue |
Imagine if he gets a 5 game ban and then is sold, meaning Wolves have not been punished at all |
Well, I mean they wouldn't have their best, 40m player anymore. There is definitely punishment there. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
