| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 14:10 - Mar 21 with 2894 views | Ralphinho |
Doesn't matter anyway, as Wolves haven't had a dip in form and we haven't been able to win a game this year yet.
Seems very lenient, considering its his second offense this season. FA obviously don't want to run the risk of us starting to pick up points and Wolves losing form without Cunha.. (joking). |  |
|  |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 14:11 - Mar 21 with 2878 views | Herbivore |
He must have some compromising photos of someone. |  |
| |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 14:14 - Mar 21 with 2836 views | Ryorry |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 14:10 - Mar 21 by Ralphinho |
Doesn't matter anyway, as Wolves haven't had a dip in form and we haven't been able to win a game this year yet.
Seems very lenient, considering its his second offense this season. FA obviously don't want to run the risk of us starting to pick up points and Wolves losing form without Cunha.. (joking). |
They really should be required to show their workings in all these matters.
Ta for posting. |  |
| |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 14:32 - Mar 21 with 2721 views | BseaBlue |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 14:14 - Mar 21 by Ryorry |
They really should be required to show their workings in all these matters.
Ta for posting. |
Quite agree.
A player that already had a lenient punishment further in the season has got away with one again it seems. I know we are pretty much dead and buried but imagine if there was only a couple of points in it!
The Millwall keeper gets six games for a dangerous incident in actual game time (Which I don't disagree with) yet Cunha loses his temper for a second time this season and gets 1 game extra. |  | | |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 14:50 - Mar 21 with 2617 views | Radlett_blue |
When McLaren & Ron Dennis were fined £100m by the FIA over the "spygate" controversy, after the hearing, Max Mosley, the FIA President whispered to Dennis (whom he loathed) "the first £50m is for breaking the rules, the other £50m is for being a c**t"". |  |
| |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 14:58 - Mar 21 with 2560 views | HighgateBlue |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 14:14 - Mar 21 by Ryorry |
They really should be required to show their workings in all these matters.
Ta for posting. |
This part of the FA website might be of interest:
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/discipline/written-reasons
You can search by player. The database contains the written reasons for the previous decision relating to Cunha. The hearing was on 30 December 2024, and the written reasons are dated 3 January 2025. I've no idea how quickly they get uploaded onto the FA Website, but it may very well take a couple of weeks. Hopefully the written reasons for the most recent decision will be published before long.
I think it's a pretty good system, and provides a reasonable amount of transparency and detail. However, that is not to say that I agree with the substance of any reasoning in relation to Cunha, or the leniency of any sanction against him.
Pleasing that he will miss the game against Town. We may already be as good as down, but at least those in the front few rows who wear glasses can rest a little easier... |  | | |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 15:05 - Mar 21 with 2515 views | SitfcB |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 14:14 - Mar 21 by Ryorry |
They really should be required to show their workings in all these matters.
Ta for posting. |
The written reasons will be published in due course. |  |
| |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 15:21 - Mar 21 with 2373 views | Ryorry |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 14:58 - Mar 21 by HighgateBlue |
This part of the FA website might be of interest:
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/discipline/written-reasons
You can search by player. The database contains the written reasons for the previous decision relating to Cunha. The hearing was on 30 December 2024, and the written reasons are dated 3 January 2025. I've no idea how quickly they get uploaded onto the FA Website, but it may very well take a couple of weeks. Hopefully the written reasons for the most recent decision will be published before long.
I think it's a pretty good system, and provides a reasonable amount of transparency and detail. However, that is not to say that I agree with the substance of any reasoning in relation to Cunha, or the leniency of any sanction against him.
Pleasing that he will miss the game against Town. We may already be as good as down, but at least those in the front few rows who wear glasses can rest a little easier... |
Searched after filling in the boxes - got 0 records found every time (maybe cos I don't know who the commission members were, so had to leave that blank - ie a flaw in the system, as who would know?). | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 15:48 - Mar 21 with 2254 views | shady |
Anything to prevent Wolves from moving a fixture forward to Sat 29th?
Possibly notice period too short and maybe explains why confirmation arrived today. |  | | |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 15:52 - Mar 21 with 2235 views | textbackup |
So with this in mind, does that mean that we will only be third bottom by 15 points come the end of the season? |  |
| |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 15:53 - Mar 21 with 2201 views | HighgateBlue |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 15:21 - Mar 21 by Ryorry |
Searched after filling in the boxes - got 0 records found every time (maybe cos I don't know who the commission members were, so had to leave that blank - ie a flaw in the system, as who would know?). |
Just stick the player's surname into "Individual Name" and click "Search". You don't need to fill in all of the boxes. | | | |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 18:36 - Mar 21 with 1867 views | OldFart71 |
I do think there has been far too much concern about what other teams and their players are doing. Yes I am aware they will be looking at us, seeing what we are doing. Which to be fair isn't much. For several months now our players have been saying "We believe in ourselves, we think we can get out of this situation" but so far zilch has happened. Every game that passes and every time we fail to win means we are closer to the drop. It matters not a jot who is suspended, what other teams do if we can't win. Frankly I don't see many three point games against the likes of Arsenal, Newcastle, Chelsea, Bournemouth and even Wolves will be quite happy to get a point at PR. Rightly you never know so there's always that chance but when you consider we need ten points more than Wolves in nine games it really doesn't look good. But that doesn't mean I will be any less passionate about ITFC whatever happens. | | | |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 18:58 - Mar 21 with 1779 views | Dubtractor |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 14:58 - Mar 21 by HighgateBlue |
This part of the FA website might be of interest:
https://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/discipline/written-reasons
You can search by player. The database contains the written reasons for the previous decision relating to Cunha. The hearing was on 30 December 2024, and the written reasons are dated 3 January 2025. I've no idea how quickly they get uploaded onto the FA Website, but it may very well take a couple of weeks. Hopefully the written reasons for the most recent decision will be published before long.
I think it's a pretty good system, and provides a reasonable amount of transparency and detail. However, that is not to say that I agree with the substance of any reasoning in relation to Cunha, or the leniency of any sanction against him.
Pleasing that he will miss the game against Town. We may already be as good as down, but at least those in the front few rows who wear glasses can rest a little easier... |
I'm delighted he'll miss the game.
He'd have been treated as a pantomime baddie all game, then inevitably scored the winner, and given it the big'un to the crowd, winding us all up even more.
At least this saves us that annoyance. |  |
| |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 19:27 - Mar 21 with 1670 views | TheBoyBlue |
Doesn't really matter. He could be banned for the rest of the season and I don't think we'll catch them.
I just intend on enjoying us in the Premier League for the next couple of months. | |
| |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 09:50 - Mar 22 with 1210 views | bournemouthblue |
Fate is a cruel mistress, I still think the first ban which was absolutely scandalous, gave them the momentum they needed at the right time in the season whilst we have regressed
The new manager for all the flack he got on appointment for his seemingly average record has turned them around massively hasn't he? |  |
| |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 10:23 - Mar 22 with 1169 views | ArnieM |
I suspect Wolves will manage to beat us even without Cunha unfortunately. They have a stronger squad in my humble view. |  |
| |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 11:22 - Mar 22 with 1113 views | WinchBlue |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 10:23 - Mar 22 by ArnieM |
I suspect Wolves will manage to beat us even without Cunha unfortunately. They have a stronger squad in my humble view. |
Everyone does bar maybe Southampton.
And even if Sheik Yer Money turned up at PR with £1b we wouldn’t be able to spend it because of FFP. |  | | |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 12:41 - Mar 22 with 1025 views | ArnieM |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 11:22 - Mar 22 by WinchBlue |
Everyone does bar maybe Southampton.
And even if Sheik Yer Money turned up at PR with £1b we wouldn’t be able to spend it because of FFP. |
This is why they can keep the PL . It's heavily tilted in favour of established clubs. Sod em all. | |
| |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 12:43 - Mar 22 with 1016 views | bournemouthblue |
| FA Confirms Cunha Ban.. on 11:22 - Mar 22 by WinchBlue |
Everyone does bar maybe Southampton.
And even if Sheik Yer Money turned up at PR with £1b we wouldn’t be able to spend it because of FFP. |
I think Newcastle have suffered from that a bit themselves but are slowly moving towards being a force, which inevitably was going to happen | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
