| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest 19:25 - Aug 6 with 5296 views | danchances22 |
|  | | |  |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:29 - Aug 6 with 3510 views | Illinoisblue |
Bidding war: commence! |  |
| |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:31 - Aug 6 with 3403 views | Metal_Hacker |
And so it begins |  |
| |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:34 - Aug 6 with 3286 views | Zx1988 |
Both would seem slightly less-than-optimal propositions.
Question marks over how Brentford will perform post-Frank, and I'd also question how Forest will adapt to a campaign on two fronts. | |
| |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:37 - Aug 6 with 3194 views | ulrichlepen |
Seems strange to say he is a Jamaica international rather than an England u21 tournament winner | | | |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:38 - Aug 6 with 3121 views | Parky |
£30M and Awoniyi please. | | | |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:40 - Aug 6 with 3050 views | BlacknGoldnBlue |
Reported by Sky that they understand it will take a MUCH higher figure than £35m for Ipswich to ket him go...
I wonder if they'll test our resolve and it would imply higher than the £40m thats been mentioned on here! |  |
| |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:41 - Aug 6 with 2999 views | Guthrum |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:37 - Aug 6 by ulrichlepen |
Seems strange to say he is a Jamaica international rather than an England u21 tournament winner |
He has played at senior level for Jamaica, not (yet) for England. He can still choose to go either way, due to age when he made those appearances. |  |
| |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:41 - Aug 6 with 2976 views | Bellevue_Blue |
Wouldn't you just love to see Ashton in action when the bid comes in ... I suspect he would be a nightmare to negotiate against | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:42 - Aug 6 with 2949 views | davblue |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:31 - Aug 6 by Metal_Hacker |
And so it begins |
Endgame |  | | |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:42 - Aug 6 with 2888 views | tetchris |
I think we would accept £40million with add ons and with the majority of the money paid up front | | | |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:43 - Aug 6 with 2870 views | Trequartista |
Are they stupid? We've already rejected a £35m bid for him. |  |
| |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:44 - Aug 6 with 2836 views | GavTWTD |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:40 - Aug 6 by BlacknGoldnBlue |
Reported by Sky that they understand it will take a MUCH higher figure than £35m for Ipswich to ket him go...
I wonder if they'll test our resolve and it would imply higher than the £40m thats been mentioned on here! |
We're going to have a very unhappy player if he's not sold this window. |  |
| |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:44 - Aug 6 with 2819 views | WeirdFishes |
Let them fight amongst themselves, I can see this going to the wire to maximise our fee. |  |
| |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:45 - Aug 6 with 2775 views | vilanovablue |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:42 - Aug 6 by tetchris |
I think we would accept £40million with add ons and with the majority of the money paid up front |
I'm sure we would but if it's half upfront and the rest as normal I'm pretty confident we'd accept. I don't want him to go btw but for that sort of cash we have to say goodbye. |  | | |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:45 - Aug 6 with 2770 views | Smoresy |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:34 - Aug 6 by Zx1988 |
Both would seem slightly less-than-optimal propositions.
Question marks over how Brentford will perform post-Frank, and I'd also question how Forest will adapt to a campaign on two fronts. |
Both could be great for him imo.
Brentford because they're a good team with gaps up front, plenty of opportunity to play and showcase his ability.
Forest because they're fighting on more fronts and have some great players: limited threat of looking downwards, plus more opportunities to play than if they hadn't been in Europe. | | | |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:47 - Aug 6 with 2725 views | Vic |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:44 - Aug 6 by GavTWTD |
We're going to have a very unhappy player if he's not sold this window. |
Think it’s pretty clear that he will be isnt it. |  |
| |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:48 - Aug 6 with 2693 views | bsw72 |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:43 - Aug 6 by Trequartista |
Are they stupid? We've already rejected a £35m bid for him. |
Depends on the terms, the Brentford £35m was turned down as it was in split payments, maybe forest chanced their arm on a single up front payment initially to test the water. |  | | |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:48 - Aug 6 with 2678 views | Bellevue_Blue |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:40 - Aug 6 by BlacknGoldnBlue |
Reported by Sky that they understand it will take a MUCH higher figure than £35m for Ipswich to ket him go...
I wonder if they'll test our resolve and it would imply higher than the £40m thats been mentioned on here! |
| | | |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:53 - Aug 6 with 2577 views | Ralphinho |
Makes far more sense if he wants guaranteed Prem football beyond the end of this season. Have to wonder quite how much he will actually get with the quality of Forests players.
Shame they couldn't have let us have one more game of Clutch Hutch before stepping up the pursuit. | |
| |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:58 - Aug 6 with 2478 views | FromReuserWithLove |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:44 - Aug 6 by GavTWTD |
We're going to have a very unhappy player if he's not sold this window. |
Well he’ll have to suck it up won’t he. Fabulous to know we hold all the cards and it’s all on our terms. If clubs want him, then pay up, we ain’t that soft touch anymore. |  | | |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 20:01 - Aug 6 with 2408 views | _clive_baker_ |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:44 - Aug 6 by GavTWTD |
We're going to have a very unhappy player if he's not sold this window. |
Can’t see a world where we don’t tbh. Only question is really to whom and for how much? Hopefully 2 or 3 clubs wanting him will force something of a bidding war.
If Southampton are looking at £40m+ for Dibling I don’t see why we can’t expect the same for Hutchinson. |  | | |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 20:12 - Aug 6 with 2213 views | davblue |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:43 - Aug 6 by Trequartista |
Are they stupid? We've already rejected a £35m bid for him. |
Omari hadn’t also at that publicly been angling for a move when that bid was rejected. Forest are hoping that him doing that reduces the price to the release clause he had. [Post edited 6 Aug 20:13]
| | | |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 20:14 - Aug 6 with 2139 views | Ralphinho |
Talk Sport quoting "Closer to £50m" as our asking price.. Wow!
MA Masterclass inbound. | |
| |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 20:18 - Aug 6 with 2069 views | RadioOrwell |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 19:41 - Aug 6 by Bellevue_Blue |
Wouldn't you just love to see Ashton in action when the bid comes in ... I suspect he would be a nightmare to negotiate against |
Yes but Delap something something Ashton out blub |  | | |
| Ipswich reject 35m for Hutchinson from forest on 20:30 - Aug 6 with 1897 views | BudapestByBlimp |
Just over 4 years ago when we were drawing 0-0 at home with Northampton in one of the most awful displays I can remember I never thought we'd ever be turning down £35 million offers for one of our players.
He's going but the interest from several clubs is good news for us. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
