| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) 19:43 - Aug 29 with 3500 views | jasondozzell |
|  | | |  |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 22:29 - Aug 29 with 858 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 22:28 - Aug 29 by Pinewoodblue |
We are required to have one former academy player in the matchday squad doubt it will be anyone who played for U21’s tonight. |
Not required, just means you can only have 8 subs instead of 9 if you don’t. |  |
| |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 22:44 - Aug 29 with 781 views | bluefunk |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 22:28 - Aug 29 by Pinewoodblue |
We are required to have one former academy player in the matchday squad doubt it will be anyone who played for U21’s tonight. |
Isn’t that a UK academy player not just an ITFC academy player, so Johnson, for example, meets that criteria, |  | | |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 03:18 - Aug 30 with 643 views | pointofblue |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 22:44 - Aug 29 by bluefunk |
Isn’t that a UK academy player not just an ITFC academy player, so Johnson, for example, meets that criteria, |
Has to be someone developed at the club before a certain age - 19? So Woolfenden and Humphreys both count. |  |
| |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 05:52 - Aug 30 with 597 views | franz_tyson |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 03:18 - Aug 30 by pointofblue |
Has to be someone developed at the club before a certain age - 19? So Woolfenden and Humphreys both count. |
Could be a reason Barbrook stays. Doesn't count to squad number through age and is a academy product.
He really should be getting a loan in L2 or L1 ( if possible) , but he's a lot closer to the squad than the other u21's.
It would be pretty galling we want Woolfy to stay only because we can have 9 subs. And we're going to have plenty of competition on the bench and we dont really need both Kipre and Woolfy. | | | |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 07:36 - Aug 30 with 504 views | Daninthecampo |
I think he'll still go, he won't get games and is unhappy here. I'm sue Furlong can cover there if O"Shea is injured | | | |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 07:50 - Aug 30 with 460 views | DJR |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 03:18 - Aug 30 by pointofblue |
Has to be someone developed at the club before a certain age - 19? So Woolfenden and Humphreys both count. |
After the Southampton game, McKenna indicated Humphreys would be in the squad which made me think Woolfy was on his way out. Humphrey also offers more options from the bench. |  | | |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 07:53 - Aug 30 with 451 views | OldFart71 |
I think a fee of around £10 million and he'd be on his way. He has been unsettled now for most of last season and this. It can be said he hasn't let anyone down when he has played whereas although I believe Greaves to be a decent player he has been prone to mistakes. Whether a more secure midfield will make the situation better we will see. | | | |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 08:28 - Aug 30 with 376 views | AVJones |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 07:53 - Aug 30 by OldFart71 |
I think a fee of around £10 million and he'd be on his way. He has been unsettled now for most of last season and this. It can be said he hasn't let anyone down when he has played whereas although I believe Greaves to be a decent player he has been prone to mistakes. Whether a more secure midfield will make the situation better we will see. |
Let’s be honest, if was that unsettled he was an idiot to sign a new contract. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 08:31 - Aug 30 with 364 views | Wallingford_Boy |
Think it’s best for everyone that he moves on now.
Shame. |  |
| |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 08:37 - Aug 30 with 339 views | IndependentlyBlue |
Scum could with a good central defender. Just saying like  |  |
| Better to stay silent and be thought a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt |
| |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 10:26 - Aug 30 with 241 views | AWOL |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 08:37 - Aug 30 by IndependentlyBlue |
Scum could with a good central defender. Just saying like |
Can you imagine🤔🤔🤔
Woolfy at the back
Sargent in attack….
😂😂😂
I predict a riot | | | |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 10:53 - Aug 30 with 148 views | BouncebackIpswich |
Would like to see O'Shea and the Woolf as our starters tbh. |  | | |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 11:26 - Aug 30 with 71 views | pointofblue |
| Woolfy staying then - feels right (n/t) on 08:28 - Aug 30 by AVJones |
Let’s be honest, if was that unsettled he was an idiot to sign a new contract. |
I think it was all down to the belief that he would be a starter if we were relegated, with the thought that O'Shea would leave if we went down. He could accept being a squad player in the Premier League, but in the Championship it's tougher to handle.
I do agree he should not have signed it, though. What I will say is he hasn't taken things as far as others yet. All he's done is post something cryptic on Instagram. He hasn't yet refused to be in the squad, or been such an unsettling influence that McKenna has told him to train elsewhere. If he wanted to force a move he could turn the screw like Isak, Wissa and Hutchinson. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
