| If Burns wasn't injured.. 17:22 - Sep 1 with 1285 views | BlacknGoldnBlue |
would he also be leaving today?
|  |
| |  |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 17:23 - Sep 1 with 1257 views | DavoIPB |
Don't know, ask Kieran. |  | | |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 17:24 - Sep 1 with 1254 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
Who knows. Make no sense to speculate. |  |
| |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 17:24 - Sep 1 with 1234 views | J2BLUE |
Doubt it. We have clearly missed him. |  |
| |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 17:25 - Sep 1 with 1224 views | Edmundo |
I think he will go in January. 29 years old and "not good enough for the Prem".
Feel sick typing it. |  |
| |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 17:26 - Sep 1 with 1186 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
I would imagine he already has an offer from Wrexham for the Jan window. |  |
| |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 17:28 - Sep 1 with 1139 views | Sarge |
Probably. We only bought him for £100k and he’s done well for us so meets all the criteria to be shown the door. | | | |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 17:30 - Sep 1 with 1103 views | ITFCSG |
...he would still be down the pecking order because McK would insist to play his new signings. Heck even McAteer will get the nod ahead of him. | | | |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 17:30 - Sep 1 with 1094 views | John_Warks_Willy |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 17:28 - Sep 1 by Sarge |
Probably. We only bought him for £100k and he’s done well for us so meets all the criteria to be shown the door. |
Only £100k. Amazing buy |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 17:31 - Sep 1 with 1078 views | RIPbobby |
Perhaps this is why he has been so quiet. He can see what has happened to us. |  | | |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 17:32 - Sep 1 with 1052 views | lurcher |
I dont see a role for him. Sides will sit back in this league and we are going to need ball playing dribblers. Similar problem to the one we had with ogbene. |  | | |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 17:36 - Sep 1 with 938 views | BasingstokeBlue |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 17:30 - Sep 1 by John_Warks_Willy |
Only £100k. Amazing buy |
A lot of money in Division Three, those days. |  |
| |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 17:41 - Sep 1 with 848 views | Wallingford_Boy |
Not with Ogbene gone.
He is 3rd choice down the right now though, so maybe. |  |
| |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 17:41 - Sep 1 with 847 views | CopfordBlue |
If he’s lost any of his pace at all then he’ll be gone in January. | |
| |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 17:47 - Sep 1 with 773 views | Steve_M |
Given he has been given a squad place despite being a way off returning then probably not. |  |
| |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 18:07 - Sep 1 with 664 views | TheGentlemanViking |
I wouldn't have thought so.
He's the only winger we have who isn't afraid to run at a man, stay wide and get a cross in. All the others want to cut back and go central. My money is on him being a valuable player in the second half of the season.
He also offers a level of defensive protection that none of our other wingers do. |  | | |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 18:10 - Sep 1 with 631 views | RIPbobby |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 18:07 - Sep 1 by TheGentlemanViking |
I wouldn't have thought so.
He's the only winger we have who isn't afraid to run at a man, stay wide and get a cross in. All the others want to cut back and go central. My money is on him being a valuable player in the second half of the season.
He also offers a level of defensive protection that none of our other wingers do. |
We can't run at a man. He can run past them, but is not a dribbler at all. Jack and philogene are dribblers. Perhaps the new guy with the long name too. | | | |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 18:11 - Sep 1 with 617 views | _clive_baker_ |
Depends how the come back goes surely? If he can work his way back in to the side who knows, otherwise I can see him running his contract down, or being a makeweight in Jan along with Harry Clarke to add a couple more. |  | | |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 18:31 - Sep 1 with 512 views | TheGentlemanViking |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 18:10 - Sep 1 by RIPbobby |
We can't run at a man. He can run past them, but is not a dribbler at all. Jack and philogene are dribblers. Perhaps the new guy with the long name too. |
I think we'll have to disagree there, I've seen Wes take the ball past plenty of fullbacks, especially at this level. He might not be able to carry the ball as effortlessly as Clarke or Philogene but he's exactly what this squad is missing right now, a strong, direct outlet. | | | |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 18:45 - Sep 1 with 403 views | ITFCSG |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 18:10 - Sep 1 by RIPbobby |
We can't run at a man. He can run past them, but is not a dribbler at all. Jack and philogene are dribblers. Perhaps the new guy with the long name too. |
J Clarke and Philogene are dribblers with no end product. Either they run into a cul de sac, get dispossessed easily or dribble backwards.
What a bloomin' waste of £35 million. | | | |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 19:05 - Sep 1 with 307 views | reusersfreekicks |
| If Burns wasn't injured.. on 17:25 - Sep 1 by Edmundo |
I think he will go in January. 29 years old and "not good enough for the Prem".
Feel sick typing it. |
Think you're right and agree with the sentiment |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
