Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Gambling ads 19:02 - Oct 8 with 1029 viewsgtsb1966

I know this has been discussed many times before and luckily I dont gamble so its irrelevant to me but these numbers are unbelievable.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/ce9ree15yd0o
1
Gambling ads on 19:16 - Oct 8 with 971 viewsMullet

Sadly, they’re really not.

What’s unbelievable is that it’s allowed. Profiting off of people’s misery and addictions shouldn’t be mainstream should it? The way football is completely entwined with gambling is pretty sickening.

Poll: Which itfc kit do you usually buy
Blog: When the Fanzine Comes Around

3
Gambling ads on 19:17 - Oct 8 with 970 viewsJ2BLUE

The ban is working well...

Completely pointless. This should embarrass those who brought the ban in for it being so pathetic.

Truly impaired.
Poll: Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

0
Gambling ads on 19:21 - Oct 8 with 953 viewsMark

Just think how much money these gambling firms must make from fans unfortunate enough to be sucked into the world of gambling. For those who become addicted it is very bad news for themselves and their families.

Man City and Wolves are mentioned in the article. They have the biggest pitch-side adverts, which look absolutely horrible in my opinion. We should not have all this advertising when fans pay premium prices for tickets and TV subscriptions.
3
Gambling ads on 21:52 - Oct 9 with 752 viewsBlueBadger

Gambling ads on 19:17 - Oct 8 by J2BLUE

The ban is working well...

Completely pointless. This should embarrass those who brought the ban in for it being so pathetic.


The gambling firms, the telly channels and the various football authorities have possibly made the best possible argument for a statutory ban by demonstrating that they basically had no intention of 'self regulating'.

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: How will About Anglia/Look East spin this?
Blog: From Despair to Where?

3
Gambling ads on 22:55 - Oct 9 with 681 viewsFBI

It's a sickness that's been allowed to permeate this and many other sports.

I tend to think that if the sponsor's not allowed on kids' size shirts then that's not the sort of firm you want associated with your club.

Poll: The career progress of former town players is...

1
Gambling ads on 23:07 - Oct 9 with 653 viewsZx1988

Gambling ads on 22:55 - Oct 9 by FBI

It's a sickness that's been allowed to permeate this and many other sports.

I tend to think that if the sponsor's not allowed on kids' size shirts then that's not the sort of firm you want associated with your club.


And if the sponsor isn't suitable for inclusion on a kids-size shirt, it shouldn't be suitable for use on in-stadium hoardings, where it will be just as visible to kids.

The new FIFA game is an interesting example of this. Most clubs with their own stadiums included in the game have club-specific adverts on the advertising hoardings (Bundesliga clubs, for instance), whereas a lot of British clubs get the few child-friendly league-specific sponsors (smart meters, for instance, at ITFC).

One can only imagine that, if actual UK-specific sponsors were used, the game would require a higher age rating?

You ain't a beauty but, hey, you're alright.
Poll: Stone Island - immediate associations

2
Gambling ads on 08:38 - Oct 10 with 539 viewsSwansea_Blue

Gambling ads on 19:16 - Oct 8 by Mullet

Sadly, they’re really not.

What’s unbelievable is that it’s allowed. Profiting off of people’s misery and addictions shouldn’t be mainstream should it? The way football is completely entwined with gambling is pretty sickening.


Nuts isn’t it, but money talks as usual. The industry’s worth over £15BN, so it’s in their interests to keep growing the number of people with a gambling issue (currently ~1.4 million).

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

1
Gambling ads on 09:35 - Oct 10 with 509 viewsbaxterbasics

The British approach to what is and isn't allowed is really bizarre, isn't it?

Smoking and alcohol almost completely purged now. Going that way too for junk food. But gambling? Yeah go for it.

zip
Poll: Your considered, level headed opinion of McKenna today

0
Login to get fewer ads

Gambling ads on 12:16 - Oct 10 with 449 viewsstonojnr

They are because they're counting things like if you see a supporter in merchandise with a just a gambling company logo which it doesnt even say has to be linked to the clubs. It gets counted as an ad. A logo on the players sleeve, that's an ad too. And so on. We're not talking about 5000 plus Ray Winstone ads during a game, were counting how many logos we can see, like on the post match interview boards and so on

And it doesn't even have to be linked to existing sponsors of the club They could ban all clubs from betting sponsorship & logos. and like someone sits in our stands now with a magical vegas top that would still count as an ad.

And I think doing stuff like that actually diminishes the serious real issue of problem gambling.
0
Gambling ads on 12:40 - Oct 10 with 416 viewsNedPlimpton

Gambling ads on 12:16 - Oct 10 by stonojnr

They are because they're counting things like if you see a supporter in merchandise with a just a gambling company logo which it doesnt even say has to be linked to the clubs. It gets counted as an ad. A logo on the players sleeve, that's an ad too. And so on. We're not talking about 5000 plus Ray Winstone ads during a game, were counting how many logos we can see, like on the post match interview boards and so on

And it doesn't even have to be linked to existing sponsors of the club They could ban all clubs from betting sponsorship & logos. and like someone sits in our stands now with a magical vegas top that would still count as an ad.

And I think doing stuff like that actually diminishes the serious real issue of problem gambling.


How does that diminish the issue?
0
Gambling ads on 12:56 - Oct 10 with 380 viewsJ2BLUE

Gambling ads on 23:07 - Oct 9 by Zx1988

And if the sponsor isn't suitable for inclusion on a kids-size shirt, it shouldn't be suitable for use on in-stadium hoardings, where it will be just as visible to kids.

The new FIFA game is an interesting example of this. Most clubs with their own stadiums included in the game have club-specific adverts on the advertising hoardings (Bundesliga clubs, for instance), whereas a lot of British clubs get the few child-friendly league-specific sponsors (smart meters, for instance, at ITFC).

One can only imagine that, if actual UK-specific sponsors were used, the game would require a higher age rating?


That game has a lot to answer for anyway doesn't it? Buying packs is gambling on who you will get. Lots of mobile games feature things like mystery crates where you pay to get some sort of in game currency or asset.

Lots of these things go under the radar.

Truly impaired.
Poll: Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

3
Gambling ads on 12:57 - Oct 10 with 377 viewsBlueBadger

Gambling ads on 09:35 - Oct 10 by baxterbasics

The British approach to what is and isn't allowed is really bizarre, isn't it?

Smoking and alcohol almost completely purged now. Going that way too for junk food. But gambling? Yeah go for it.


And you know what? If you say you're english these days....

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: How will About Anglia/Look East spin this?
Blog: From Despair to Where?

0
Gambling ads on 12:59 - Oct 10 with 367 viewsJ2BLUE

Gambling ads on 12:57 - Oct 10 by BlueBadger

And you know what? If you say you're english these days....


Don't really need to when dressed head to toe in St George's flags.

Truly impaired.
Poll: Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

0
Gambling ads on 13:48 - Oct 10 with 310 viewsBlueBadger

Gambling ads on 12:56 - Oct 10 by J2BLUE

That game has a lot to answer for anyway doesn't it? Buying packs is gambling on who you will get. Lots of mobile games feature things like mystery crates where you pay to get some sort of in game currency or asset.

Lots of these things go under the radar.


Plus, as an added bonus, EA are now owned by the Saudis.

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: How will About Anglia/Look East spin this?
Blog: From Despair to Where?

0
Gambling ads on 20:46 - Oct 10 with 199 viewsWeWereZombies

I was going to put this on a separate thread but, heck, let's link it into this one. Watching the Norn Ireland vs Slovak Republic match and the Slovak manager is wearing a white hoodie with large 'Lidl' logo on it. I was going to make a sneery comment but in the light of this discussion I reflected and have to say that Lidl is so much more acceptable as a sponsor than any betting company.

Poll: Jack Clarke is

1
Gambling ads on 02:11 - Oct 11 with 117 viewsJ2BLUE

Gambling ads on 20:46 - Oct 10 by WeWereZombies

I was going to put this on a separate thread but, heck, let's link it into this one. Watching the Norn Ireland vs Slovak Republic match and the Slovak manager is wearing a white hoodie with large 'Lidl' logo on it. I was going to make a sneery comment but in the light of this discussion I reflected and have to say that Lidl is so much more acceptable as a sponsor than any betting company.


I saw someone earlier with a bag for life from Lidl.

Really wish some people believed in themselves a bit more.

Truly impaired.
Poll: Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

0
Gambling ads on 08:34 - Oct 11 with 47 viewsWeWereZombies

Gambling ads on 02:11 - Oct 11 by J2BLUE

I saw someone earlier with a bag for life from Lidl.

Really wish some people believed in themselves a bit more.


Hmm, better than a bag for life from Bet365, although that would probably last longer as you only need it to carry away your winnings every few months...

Personally I would put the big Sport Direct bag below the Lidl one in self esteem terms.

Poll: Jack Clarke is

0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025