Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Your team for QPR then 09:39 - Oct 27 with 941 viewsGlasgowBlue

I’d like to see Nunez continue in the 10 if Szmods and Akpom are injured. However, KM’s post match interview seemed to dismiss that idea so I’m going.

Walton
Young*
O’Shea
Kipre
Davis
Matusiwa
Taylor
Sindre
Jaden (10)
Clarke
Azon

* I don’t think Furlong offers much going forward and that leaves Sindre pretty isolated on the right. I expect KM to go with Furlong.

Hey now, hey now, don't dream it's over
Poll: What will be announced first?
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

1
Your team for QPR then on 09:44 - Oct 27 with 880 viewsSheffordBlue

I think he'll stick with an either/or policy for Philogene and Clarke and retaining an impact option off the bench is worth it in my opinion.

Overall I think a lot will depend on the injuries to Szmods and Akpom. If one or both are available then I think there'll be very limited change from Saturday with either Nunez or Cajuste likely to partner Matusiwa even if Taylor deserves to keep the shirt.

Poll: How many points do you think you'll need to get a ticket for Norwich?

0
Your team for QPR then on 10:06 - Oct 27 with 761 viewsHighgateBlue

I would be interested to see either Nunez or Jaden at 10. I think that's the position which has been most consistently disappointing so far this season, exemplified by zero goals from SS and Akpom.

Definitely continue to give Azon a run up front. Let's see if he can show us some clinical finishing to go with his other attributes.

Don't especially mind which of our seventeen right backs starts, but the rest of the back five must stay the same, in my view. Kipre holds the shirt, and but for the blooper for the own goal, he's been very impressive in the games since Portsmouth. Greaves played against Charlton of course.

Taylor may well have done enough for the fans against WBA, but I think KM has his favourites. I'm still slightly scratching my head about why the entirety of our Premier League midfield was unceremoniously binned off as plainly not good enough, but Cajuste was desperately longed for by the fans. He's showed some nice moments this season, but regularly enough? Maybe he should start alongside Matusiwa to try to build that relationship, but I can't associate myself with any Rolls Royce talk. Morsy had more points per goal in the Prem. Remember him?
1
Your team for QPR then on 10:20 - Oct 27 with 711 viewscbower

Swap Clarke and Jaden around and have Clarke as the 10. Furlong does nothing going forward at all, you're right. Walle-Egeli gets no overlapping and often faces two alone. In the Championship at least, and I know nobody agrees, I think Harry Clarke is our best option at RB. That position is a compromise between defensive responsibility and forward threat. Furlong is a pure defender, Johnson provides a bit of both, Young is, in my opinion, a bench option. Clarke offers more than any of them for me.

bluescouser

1
Your team for QPR then on 10:33 - Oct 27 with 658 viewstractorboy1978

Your team for QPR then on 09:44 - Oct 27 by SheffordBlue

I think he'll stick with an either/or policy for Philogene and Clarke and retaining an impact option off the bench is worth it in my opinion.

Overall I think a lot will depend on the injuries to Szmods and Akpom. If one or both are available then I think there'll be very limited change from Saturday with either Nunez or Cajuste likely to partner Matusiwa even if Taylor deserves to keep the shirt.


We need to get Clarke and Philogene in the team for me. Playing on the right might not be either player's best position but they are both match winners, make things happen and can carry the ball up the pitch which is especially important away from home.

I don't really understand this concept of leaving a bit on the bench for later on in games personally. We need to start fast, make our quality count, get an early goal and make games a little bit easier for ourselves.
0
Your team for QPR then on 10:39 - Oct 27 with 627 viewsSwansea_Blue

It’ll be interesting to see how QPR tackle this one. They’ve been good on the man-to-man press and stopping teams playing so far this season, which is the type of team we’ve struggled against. Or are they going to sit off us like Charlton and WBA I wonder.

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

0
Your team for QPR then on 10:40 - Oct 27 with 621 viewsGlasgowBlue

Your team for QPR then on 10:20 - Oct 27 by cbower

Swap Clarke and Jaden around and have Clarke as the 10. Furlong does nothing going forward at all, you're right. Walle-Egeli gets no overlapping and often faces two alone. In the Championship at least, and I know nobody agrees, I think Harry Clarke is our best option at RB. That position is a compromise between defensive responsibility and forward threat. Furlong is a pure defender, Johnson provides a bit of both, Young is, in my opinion, a bench option. Clarke offers more than any of them for me.


I think a fit Harry Clarke would work really well with Sindre.

Hey now, hey now, don't dream it's over
Poll: What will be announced first?
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

1
Your team for QPR then on 10:40 - Oct 27 with 619 viewsRIPbobby

Your team for QPR then on 10:33 - Oct 27 by tractorboy1978

We need to get Clarke and Philogene in the team for me. Playing on the right might not be either player's best position but they are both match winners, make things happen and can carry the ball up the pitch which is especially important away from home.

I don't really understand this concept of leaving a bit on the bench for later on in games personally. We need to start fast, make our quality count, get an early goal and make games a little bit easier for ourselves.


This thread is a very good debate. Very interesting difference of opinions and also some valid second guessing of what the manager will do.
0
Your team for QPR then on 10:43 - Oct 27 with 602 viewsSheffordBlue

Your team for QPR then on 10:33 - Oct 27 by tractorboy1978

We need to get Clarke and Philogene in the team for me. Playing on the right might not be either player's best position but they are both match winners, make things happen and can carry the ball up the pitch which is especially important away from home.

I don't really understand this concept of leaving a bit on the bench for later on in games personally. We need to start fast, make our quality count, get an early goal and make games a little bit easier for ourselves.


Can understand wanting to get them both on the pitch but having game changing options on the bench makes sense to me. Sitting deep requires a lot of concentration and effort and having a game changer on the bench to come on fresh when the defence are tiring gives that player more of an opportunity to impact the game.

Having tried to track Philogene or Clarke for 65/70 minutes to then face the other one coming on entirely fresh must be really difficult.

Poll: How many points do you think you'll need to get a ticket for Norwich?

0
Login to get fewer ads

Your team for QPR then on 10:48 - Oct 27 with 585 viewsGuthrum

Your team for QPR then on 10:40 - Oct 27 by GlasgowBlue

I think a fit Harry Clarke would work really well with Sindre.


Unfortunately, I don't think Harry Clarke is good enough defensively. He was sometimes struggling in the Champ last time, particularly on speed and positioning. Tho agree, he is decent going forwards.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
Your team for QPR then on 10:54 - Oct 27 with 555 viewstractorboy1978

Your team for QPR then on 10:43 - Oct 27 by SheffordBlue

Can understand wanting to get them both on the pitch but having game changing options on the bench makes sense to me. Sitting deep requires a lot of concentration and effort and having a game changer on the bench to come on fresh when the defence are tiring gives that player more of an opportunity to impact the game.

Having tried to track Philogene or Clarke for 65/70 minutes to then face the other one coming on entirely fresh must be really difficult.


Philogene is someone that looks better when he starts. I don't think he's ever come on and really impacted a game. Clarke has obviously done well from the bench. You just want to give your best players the maximum number of minutes on the pitch to make an impact for me. I also think Egeli is better suited to a role off the bench at the moment. And McAteer is just crap.
0
Your team for QPR then on 10:59 - Oct 27 with 532 viewsGlasgowBlue

Your team for QPR then on 10:48 - Oct 27 by Guthrum

Unfortunately, I don't think Harry Clarke is good enough defensively. He was sometimes struggling in the Champ last time, particularly on speed and positioning. Tho agree, he is decent going forwards.


I think the perception of poor positioning in the Championship was down to the way KM liked his central defenders to get forward which left a gap that Harry was expected to cover.
[Post edited 27 Oct 12:50]

Hey now, hey now, don't dream it's over
Poll: What will be announced first?
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

0
Your team for QPR then on 11:10 - Oct 27 with 467 viewsBasingstokeBlue

Your team for QPR then on 10:20 - Oct 27 by cbower

Swap Clarke and Jaden around and have Clarke as the 10. Furlong does nothing going forward at all, you're right. Walle-Egeli gets no overlapping and often faces two alone. In the Championship at least, and I know nobody agrees, I think Harry Clarke is our best option at RB. That position is a compromise between defensive responsibility and forward threat. Furlong is a pure defender, Johnson provides a bit of both, Young is, in my opinion, a bench option. Clarke offers more than any of them for me.


Don't underestimate us ("nobody agrees") - I have been hoping that soon we shall have the dream team of Burns and H.Clarke controlling the right wing.

Poll: What do you think of the three stars being relocated?

0
Your team for QPR then on 11:51 - Oct 27 with 325 viewssouthnorfolkblue

Why play our most dangerous player out of position? JP and JC should just share that LW slot. Personally much rather see Nunez in the 10.

Poll: Our final position

0
Your team for QPR then on 12:05 - Oct 27 with 268 viewsTRUE_BLUE123

Id be very keen for Nunez in the 10. He can link play much better than Akpom or SS, high shot volume like Chaplin and also has that bit of tenacity.

Walton
Furlong
DOS
Kipre
Leif
Azor
Taylor
SWE
Nunez
Clarke
Hirst

That is what I would do.

Poll: Will Paul Lambert be Ipswich Town manager on the final day of this season ?

1
Your team for QPR then on 12:19 - Oct 27 with 231 viewsBouncebackIpswich

Your team for QPR then on 12:05 - Oct 27 by TRUE_BLUE123

Id be very keen for Nunez in the 10. He can link play much better than Akpom or SS, high shot volume like Chaplin and also has that bit of tenacity.

Walton
Furlong
DOS
Kipre
Leif
Azor
Taylor
SWE
Nunez
Clarke
Hirst

That is what I would do.


With possibly swapping Azon in for Hirst, this would be my preferred line up too. Will be extremely disappointed if Akpom or Greaves come back in.
0
Your team for QPR then on 12:35 - Oct 27 with 171 viewsvinceg

Your team for QPR then on 12:19 - Oct 27 by BouncebackIpswich

With possibly swapping Azon in for Hirst, this would be my preferred line up too. Will be extremely disappointed if Akpom or Greaves come back in.


Completely agree, this team but Azon for Hirst.

However we know Greaves, Akpom and Hirst will all start
0
Your team for QPR then on 12:45 - Oct 27 with 126 viewsLen_Brennan

Walton
Young, O'Shea, Kipre, Davis
Matusiwa, Taylor
Walle Egeli, Cajuste, Philogene
Hirst

Button
Furlong
Greaves
Baggott
Nunez
McAteer
Tudor Mendel
Clarke
Azon
0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025