| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files 09:03 - Feb 4 with 1221 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
seem to be throwing up are foreign nationals, both British.
They are both as guilty as fk, but it really does feel like the Trump DOJ is throwing out these two as the sacrificial lambs to keep other names out of the spotlight [Post edited 4 Feb 9:05]
|  |
| |  |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 09:25 - Feb 4 with 1086 views | Pinewoodblue |
It’s a controlled release I suspect the next targets will be Democrats, including Clintons
Dangerous game as sooner of later someone targeted will make disclosures concerning Trump.. |  |
| |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 09:27 - Feb 4 with 1083 views | jonny1964 |
Why don't BBC/Sky News ever focus on Farage & Trump - always Mandelson so they can have a dig at Labour, and Andrew, who's a worthless piece of sh1t anyway. |  | | |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 09:35 - Feb 4 with 1048 views | soupytwist |
Look over there - don't look over here at what some of the most powerful men in the world were doing to some vulnerable women.
Marina Hyde is pretty good on this https://www.theguardian.com/co
Worth reading if only to click on the link to the letter from Richard Branson's PR people. |  | | |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 09:45 - Feb 4 with 988 views | GlasgowBlue |
Trump is named more than any other individual in the files. But there doesn't seem to be a smoking gun when it comes to him.
Whereas their are emails and photos of Andrew Mountbatten and Peter Mandelson linking them directly to the sex trafficking and corruption most of the allegations about Trump, like the stuff EG linked the other night, are from witnesses who were described as unreliable and from people in need of psychiatric help.
There may well be more that the DOJ are withholding and we can only hope that those formere supporters of Trump like MTG keep pushing for more to be released. [Post edited 4 Feb 9:47]
|  |
| |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 09:55 - Feb 4 with 916 views | brazil1982 |
Depends what you read. French and Slovakian government ministers named. Other nationalities named. The likes of Andrew are the headline grabbers. |  | | |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 10:00 - Feb 4 with 880 views | Swansea_Blue |
Aren’t they being referred to a lot because it’s relevant to us and that’s what British commentators/media are reporting? There seem to be plenty of other names from the little I’ve seen. |  |
| |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 10:47 - Feb 4 with 748 views | Zx1988 |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 09:45 - Feb 4 by GlasgowBlue |
Trump is named more than any other individual in the files. But there doesn't seem to be a smoking gun when it comes to him.
Whereas their are emails and photos of Andrew Mountbatten and Peter Mandelson linking them directly to the sex trafficking and corruption most of the allegations about Trump, like the stuff EG linked the other night, are from witnesses who were described as unreliable and from people in need of psychiatric help.
There may well be more that the DOJ are withholding and we can only hope that those formere supporters of Trump like MTG keep pushing for more to be released. [Post edited 4 Feb 9:47]
|
It would stand to reason that if there are semi-compromising photos of Prince Nonce, there should be similar photos of other 'participants'. I would also suggest that there exists absolutely incontrovertible photos and videos of the involved parties as well.
Whether they'll ever be released I have no idea, but their retention (either permanently, or for the time being) is absolutely a deliberate decision.
I simply refuse to believe that a chap who took/commissioned the photos that have been released of Prince Nonce absolutely refused to document the more heinous goings on. | |
| |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 10:52 - Feb 4 with 707 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 10:47 - Feb 4 by Zx1988 |
It would stand to reason that if there are semi-compromising photos of Prince Nonce, there should be similar photos of other 'participants'. I would also suggest that there exists absolutely incontrovertible photos and videos of the involved parties as well.
Whether they'll ever be released I have no idea, but their retention (either permanently, or for the time being) is absolutely a deliberate decision.
I simply refuse to believe that a chap who took/commissioned the photos that have been released of Prince Nonce absolutely refused to document the more heinous goings on. |
There’s the boxes of archived CCTV footage from the island sized by the FBI for a start. That’s going to show pretty much everything that went on if the victims’ reports are correct (because Epstein had cameras everywhere for blackmail purposes). | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 11:03 - Feb 4 with 653 views | Benters |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 09:27 - Feb 4 by jonny1964 |
Why don't BBC/Sky News ever focus on Farage & Trump - always Mandelson so they can have a dig at Labour, and Andrew, who's a worthless piece of sh1t anyway. |
Seriously? |  |
| |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 11:06 - Feb 4 with 628 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 09:27 - Feb 4 by jonny1964 |
Why don't BBC/Sky News ever focus on Farage & Trump - always Mandelson so they can have a dig at Labour, and Andrew, who's a worthless piece of sh1t anyway. |
What? The Mandelson scandal is one of the biggest cases of corruption in British politics in a generation. Probably the biggest since Profumo.
Mandelson has held a high profile position in every Labour government since 1997. It could seriously bring the government down. Nothing to do with a dig at Labour. [Post edited 4 Feb 11:26]
| |
| |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 11:16 - Feb 4 with 560 views | jonny1964 |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 11:03 - Feb 4 by Benters |
Seriously? |
seriously.... | | | |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 11:21 - Feb 4 with 536 views | SomethingBlue |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 11:03 - Feb 4 by Benters |
Seriously? |
Your heroes are laughing at you – in plain sight! The rest of us would be too if it wasn't so serious. | |
| |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 11:28 - Feb 4 with 505 views | Cafe_Newman |
It's not complicated.
There must be thousands of people from all political persuasions, judges, law enforcement, royalty etc from multiple countries are on that list.
Every person who suspects they might feature in those files is living in fear that their names will be made public. When things go quite, these people relax and start speaking candidly, and perhaps - heaven-forbid - serving their constituents, speaking out against genocide and criticising the world's global elite until... bang! a member of the royal family (albeit a previously disgraced one) and a (former) high-ranking politician is exposed. So everyone falls back in line. Politics has always had its sacrificial lambs.
The Epstein Files is the gift that keeps giving, and we will still be talking about it in decades to come. There is no genuine intention to make it fully public because it's an essential tool to guarantee conformity among policy makers and enforcers. [Post edited 4 Feb 11:42]
|  | | |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 11:46 - Feb 4 with 453 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 09:45 - Feb 4 by GlasgowBlue |
Trump is named more than any other individual in the files. But there doesn't seem to be a smoking gun when it comes to him.
Whereas their are emails and photos of Andrew Mountbatten and Peter Mandelson linking them directly to the sex trafficking and corruption most of the allegations about Trump, like the stuff EG linked the other night, are from witnesses who were described as unreliable and from people in need of psychiatric help.
There may well be more that the DOJ are withholding and we can only hope that those formere supporters of Trump like MTG keep pushing for more to be released. [Post edited 4 Feb 9:47]
|
The DoJ have admitted to withholding 3million more files. Almost 50% of what exists.
The person running that release process is Trump’s former personal attorney (Blanche) who he installed in the DoJ as Deputy Attorney General and who released Maxwell to the ‘softer’ prison after interviewing her. Convenient…
One line of the Excel spreadsheet I linked questioned the reliability of a witness. The rest holds as much weight as other allegations you refer to and have been repeated by the victims to the US media. Yet Trump’s control of the media and every branch of Government and justice department means it is not followed through on.
Trump has decided of course that he is innocent, despite being the most frequently named person in the files. And we should all move on.
|  | | |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 11:47 - Feb 4 with 448 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 09:25 - Feb 4 by Pinewoodblue |
It’s a controlled release I suspect the next targets will be Democrats, including Clintons
Dangerous game as sooner of later someone targeted will make disclosures concerning Trump.. |
Clinton has been named and he released a statement that said to the DoJ to release everything so he could clear his name.
Trump has done everything to block the release at every turn | | | |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 11:52 - Feb 4 with 427 views | Cafe_Newman |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 11:46 - Feb 4 by ElderGrizzly |
The DoJ have admitted to withholding 3million more files. Almost 50% of what exists.
The person running that release process is Trump’s former personal attorney (Blanche) who he installed in the DoJ as Deputy Attorney General and who released Maxwell to the ‘softer’ prison after interviewing her. Convenient…
One line of the Excel spreadsheet I linked questioned the reliability of a witness. The rest holds as much weight as other allegations you refer to and have been repeated by the victims to the US media. Yet Trump’s control of the media and every branch of Government and justice department means it is not followed through on.
Trump has decided of course that he is innocent, despite being the most frequently named person in the files. And we should all move on.
|
Oh look, the Epstein files are in the news again! I wonder what important global or national event is going on that people are being distracted from this week? | | | |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 12:03 - Feb 4 with 327 views | eirannach_gorm |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 09:55 - Feb 4 by brazil1982 |
Depends what you read. French and Slovakian government ministers named. Other nationalities named. The likes of Andrew are the headline grabbers. |
https://www.bbc.com/news/artic | | | |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 12:04 - Feb 4 with 325 views | LeoMuff |
Redacted |  |
| |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 12:08 - Feb 4 with 313 views | WeWereZombies |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 09:27 - Feb 4 by jonny1964 |
Why don't BBC/Sky News ever focus on Farage & Trump - always Mandelson so they can have a dig at Labour, and Andrew, who's a worthless piece of sh1t anyway. |
This story was on my BBC homepage when I opened it this morning:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/art
It's eight hours old now, i.e. it had been up for five and a half hours by the time of your post. Although the bit I am cutting and pasting for Phil's sake is:
'Bill Gates has not been accused of wrongdoing by any of Epstein's victims and his name being included in the files does not imply criminal activity of any kind.'
It's a complex little story within a big story and the legal caveat does remind me that life is too often like 'The Simpsons', in this case the episodes where a phalanx of paralegals turn up and shout down any reference to Microsoft. |  |
| |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 12:13 - Feb 4 with 279 views | Benters |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 11:21 - Feb 4 by SomethingBlue |
Your heroes are laughing at you – in plain sight! The rest of us would be too if it wasn't so serious. |
Balls. | |
| |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 12:30 - Feb 4 with 199 views | CopfordBlue |
I just upvoted this and then realised it could be interpreted as me having sympathy for Mandelson or Windsor. I have none for either and feel that they are deserving of everything that has and will come their way.
It is incredible though that there seems to have been more decisive action by the authorities in the UK since the latest release a week ago than by the DOJ in years. It is beyond ridiculous for them to claim that the millions of hours involved in their investigation unearthed nothing that would secure a conviction beyond Epstein himself and Maxwell. | |
| |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 12:38 - Feb 4 with 138 views | Pinewoodblue |
| Why is it, that the only two names the Epstein files on 11:47 - Feb 4 by ElderGrizzly |
Clinton has been named and he released a statement that said to the DoJ to release everything so he could clear his name.
Trump has done everything to block the release at every turn |
This administration will do its upmost to avoid releasing any documentation that doesn’t supports its agenda. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
