By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
who do you want to go down?..the obvious answer is the Spammers and their godawful soulless dump of a ground…but on the other hand is it Spuds if only for the lols?
[Post edited 7 May 19:02]
0
Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 18:57 - May 7 with 718 views
I loathe West Ham. Everything about them. They can go.
But in the unlikely event that it’s Spuds, it’ll be so funny. I suspect the EPL will have to do something to save them ‘for the brand’. The easy way is to kick out the next dispensable club with ‘financial irregularities’ or something.
0
Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 19:48 - May 7 with 667 views
Spurs. Big six my @rse. European super league my big fat hairy @rse.
Also West Ham are a bit of a basket case at the moment and will continue to be so next year so I confidently predict that if they stay up this year they will go down next.
Definitely Spurs. If they stay up I don't see De Zerbi having them in a relegation scrap next season so that's one less team we are likely to finish above.
West Ham are an absolute mess and I could easily see them as a competitor in the relegation battle next season. The new Football Boardroom podcast doesn't put there in future in a good light so would fancy us to finish above them if we have a good summer.
That being said I'd lose no sleep at West Ham going down, and staying down for a long time. Being passed by Millwall on the way up would be even funnier.
0
Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 20:29 - May 7 with 619 views
If Spam go down, what is their financial situation like and are they likely to be left with a load of overpaid players similar to Leicester? Is there any danger that they might fail to come back up in the next 2 years? I could see them becoming a long term casualty.
Which wouldn't be funny at all. Definitely not. Snigger...
1
Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 21:14 - May 7 with 577 views
Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 20:42 - May 7 by blue_curacao
If Spam go down, what is their financial situation like and are they likely to be left with a load of overpaid players similar to Leicester? Is there any danger that they might fail to come back up in the next 2 years? I could see them becoming a long term casualty.
Which wouldn't be funny at all. Definitely not. Snigger...
Doesn't make pleasant listening for the Spammers
2
Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 11:42 - May 8 with 453 views
You'll be happy I'm doing my part. I put three members of the Spurs team in my FPL team and triple captained one of them. 99% chance that seals their fate!
[Post edited 8 May 14:41]
Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top.
Wet Spam. Have worked with so many Hammers fans over the years,they think they are such a big deal and they really aren’t. Plus that stadium will look like a dust bowl half empty.
0
Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 15:12 - May 8 with 381 views
Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 15:01 - May 8 by blueoutlook
Wet Spam. Have worked with so many Hammers fans over the years,they think they are such a big deal and they really aren’t. Plus that stadium will look like a dust bowl half empty.
As opposed to a toilet bowl with it full?
1
Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 15:26 - May 8 with 378 views
Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 15:24 - May 7 by Kropotkin123
Spurs, to highlight how ridiculous the breakaway league was.
Exactly. Celebrity Spurs fan Danny Kelly (who's currently being treated for cancer so can't be too hard on him) criticised the super league by pointing out that two of its proposed members rented their ground off the local council, presumably the two Milan teams.
If Spurs do go down people will be able to tell him that at least the ones who rent their ground off the council have managed to stay in the top flight in their country.
And, not only will we still be able to say that we've won the league more recently than they have, they'll have been in the second tier more recently than we have too.
[Post edited 8 May 15:34]
0
Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 16:00 - May 8 with 356 views
Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 21:45 - May 7 by RayleighBlue
Doesn't make pleasant listening for the Spammers
Watched this from a ITFC selfish viewpoint, better Spurs go down as WHU will surely struggle next season as likely to be selling 3-4 of their best players this Summer even if they stay up. Dislike West Ham far more than Spurs but needs must.
0
Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 18:47 - May 8 with 306 views
Shammers would have gone last season if not for us, Southampton and Leicester making such a pigs ear of it. Even their fans new it on that last day, a very different crowd to normal.
0
Wet Spam or Spuds…? on 18:51 - May 8 with 294 views
I loathe West Ham. Everything about them. They can go.
But in the unlikely event that it’s Spuds, it’ll be so funny. I suspect the EPL will have to do something to save them ‘for the brand’. The easy way is to kick out the next dispensable club with ‘financial irregularities’ or something.
I think Villa ‘did something to save them’ last Sunday.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
