| Sink it on 20:34 - Jun 16 with 667 views | Mookamoo |
With what? Have we actually got any functioning warships at the moment? |  | |  |
| Sink it on 20:35 - Jun 16 with 657 views | GlasgowBlue |
| Sink it on 20:34 - Jun 16 by Mookamoo |
With what? Have we actually got any functioning warships at the moment? |
Spud guns and pea shooters.. |  |
| |
| Sink it on 20:40 - Jun 16 with 610 views | Kropotkin123 |
| Sink it on 20:34 - Jun 16 by Mookamoo |
With what? Have we actually got any functioning warships at the moment? |
I get the point, and 100% agree with bringing the fleet up to standard. But that said, we have submarines capable of taking it out. Doing so with another warship would be risky. |  |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
| Sink it on 20:45 - Jun 16 with 578 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Isn't this actually a headline out of nothing?
The warship attempted to make contact with and warn the approaching yacht and then fired the warning shots with rifles. |  |
| |
| Sink it on 20:47 - Jun 16 with 563 views | baxterbasics |
| Sink it on 20:40 - Jun 16 by Kropotkin123 |
I get the point, and 100% agree with bringing the fleet up to standard. But that said, we have submarines capable of taking it out. Doing so with another warship would be risky. |
Would taking it out from the air be feasible? |  |
| |
| Sink it on 20:54 - Jun 16 with 521 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Sink it on 20:47 - Jun 16 by baxterbasics |
Would taking it out from the air be feasible? |
Taking it out at all would have huge ramifications ... just like if the frigate had sunk the yacht (at which point sinking the frigate would have legitimacy). | |
| |
| Sink it on 20:57 - Jun 16 with 497 views | Freddies_Ears |
| Sink it on 20:47 - Jun 16 by baxterbasics |
Would taking it out from the air be feasible? |
Sure. But we don't have a missile defence system to cope with the incoming nukes the next day. |  | | |
| Sink it on 20:58 - Jun 16 with 497 views | Kropotkin123 |
| Sink it on 20:47 - Jun 16 by baxterbasics |
Would taking it out from the air be feasible? |
I don't think we have that capability...
Quick Google suggests we retired that missile class.
Due to the cost, probably better to replace with land and sea drones. Could build a more credible deterrent following Ukraine's model against Russian naval vessels. | |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Sink it on 20:59 - Jun 16 with 487 views | Kropotkin123 |
| Sink it on 20:57 - Jun 16 by Freddies_Ears |
Sure. But we don't have a missile defence system to cope with the incoming nukes the next day. |
Okay Neville, we have nukes. They aren't firing nukes. Just like they didn't when Turkey wiped one of their planes for violating their airspace. | |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
| Sink it on 21:01 - Jun 16 with 471 views | redrickstuhaart |
| Sink it on 20:57 - Jun 16 by Freddies_Ears |
Sure. But we don't have a missile defence system to cope with the incoming nukes the next day. |
The Russians dont have anti missile capacity to deal with our nukes either. And ours are more likely to work. | |
| |
| Sink it on 21:04 - Jun 16 with 464 views | Kropotkin123 |
| Sink it on 20:45 - Jun 16 by Nthsuffolkblue |
Isn't this actually a headline out of nothing?
The warship attempted to make contact with and warn the approaching yacht and then fired the warning shots with rifles. |
No, it is a complete and deliberate overreaction based on us seizing a shadow fleet boat.
If I attempted to make contact with a baby crawling towards me "dangerously", and then shot at it because it didn't listen, you'd think I was crazy, and you'd be right. It is a crazy action to take. [Post edited 16 Jun 21:04]
| |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
| Sink it on 21:04 - Jun 16 with 459 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Sink it on 20:45 - Jun 16 by Nthsuffolkblue |
Isn't this actually a headline out of nothing?
The warship attempted to make contact with and warn the approaching yacht and then fired the warning shots with rifles. |
It sounds like people would rather blow it up and kill everyone on board causing a massive international crisis (whilst leaving widows and kids without a father/mother). |  |
| |
| Sink it on 21:06 - Jun 16 with 442 views | NthQldITFC |
| Sink it on 20:34 - Jun 16 by Mookamoo |
With what? Have we actually got any functioning warships at the moment? |
With good, old-fashioned British spunk! |  |
| |
| Sink it on 21:09 - Jun 16 with 428 views | Kropotkin123 |
| Sink it on 21:04 - Jun 16 by Swansea_Blue |
It sounds like people would rather blow it up and kill everyone on board causing a massive international crisis (whilst leaving widows and kids without a father/mother). |
I'd rather take it out because of multiple hostile instances. You can only ignore them for so long. Russia have killed people on our soil. They view us as the enemy. They need to go back to Russian waters. They won't without credible deterrents. Part of the credibility is using it. | |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
