| Drab on 12:56 - Jul 18 with 1278 views | djgooder |
Yep - that’s ridiculous |  | |  |
| Drab on 13:27 - Jul 18 with 1132 views | RetroBlue |
God, can there be a more horrendous kit? Gotta feel sorry for their fans |  |
| |
| Drab on 13:47 - Jul 18 with 1044 views | Scuzzer |
Mitchell, born in Soke, died 90 years ago. A year after the Spitfire, which he designed, took to the skies for the first time. Without the Spitfire we may well have lost the Battle of Britain and then be exposed to an invasion by the German forces. The camouflage pays homage to that used by the RAF on their planes during that battle. So I can see why they have done it...but I'm not sure its the right place for it. |  |
| |
| Drab on 13:48 - Jul 18 with 1032 views | Bluebert |
| Drab on 13:27 - Jul 18 by RetroBlue |
God, can there be a more horrendous kit? Gotta feel sorry for their fans |
It’s not yellow and green….. |  | | |
| Drab on 14:49 - Jul 18 with 763 views | RetroBlue |
| Drab on 13:48 - Jul 18 by Bluebert |
It’s not yellow and green….. |
I was waiting for that post, lol, agreed though. | |
| |
| Drab on 15:02 - Jul 18 with 704 views | jontysnut |
Bloke goes into a department store
" Excuse me I'm looking for the camouflage department"
"It's over there"
"I can't see anything"
" Good, isn't it" |  | | |
| Drab on 15:07 - Jul 18 with 678 views | Kropotkin123 |
| Drab on 13:47 - Jul 18 by Scuzzer |
Mitchell, born in Soke, died 90 years ago. A year after the Spitfire, which he designed, took to the skies for the first time. Without the Spitfire we may well have lost the Battle of Britain and then be exposed to an invasion by the German forces. The camouflage pays homage to that used by the RAF on their planes during that battle. So I can see why they have done it...but I'm not sure its the right place for it. |
Regardless of the reason and ethics, it is a terrible kit. They could have done something much better honouring the spitfire. |  |
| Submit your 1-24 league prediction here -https://www.twtd.co.uk/forum/514096/page:1 - for the opportunity to get a free Ipswich top. | | Poll: | Would you rather | | Blog: | Round Four: Eagle |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Drab on 15:19 - Jul 18 with 643 views | Axeldalai_lama |
| Drab on 15:07 - Jul 18 by Kropotkin123 |
Regardless of the reason and ethics, it is a terrible kit. They could have done something much better honouring the spitfire. |
It does seem to be a quickly made marketing type decision via word association. As you say, a generic camo kit doesn't seem to scream spitfire in any way. Nice original thought, but very uninspiring end result. |  | | |
| Drab on 15:40 - Jul 18 with 580 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
To be fair, if your tactics are lump it forward aimlessly and based around outmuscling and tackling the opponents, that is a perfect kit isn't it? |  |
| |
| Drab on 15:45 - Jul 18 with 551 views | britbiker |
| Drab on 15:40 - Jul 18 by Nthsuffolkblue |
To be fair, if your tactics are lump it forward aimlessly and based around outmuscling and tackling the opponents, that is a perfect kit isn't it? |
Needs to have the old tin hats with twigs and grass, ala Dads Army.
The flare guns pre game will give it the authentic feel |  | | |
| Drab on 16:25 - Jul 18 with 452 views | football |
At least Southampton won't see then training |  | | |
| Drab on 16:39 - Jul 18 with 405 views | BlueandTruesince82 |
This is so bad it should be banned. |  |
| |
| Drab on 19:05 - Jul 18 with 279 views | ButchersBrokenNose |
This reminds me of the logic behind the grey England away kit for Euro 96. Umbro openly admitted they designed it "because it looks good with jeans." Both were nice shirts, but not for playing in. That's why we have third kits now. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
