| If it is 3 at the back... 11:27 - Jul 20 with 1246 views | surreyblue | How do you think the rest of the team lines up? 343 or 352? The former seems more likely with the players we have on our books now? |  | | |  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 11:30 - Jul 20 with 1212 views | Cheltenham_Blue | With Diop, we have 4 senior CB's following Baggott leaving. People have gone very early on a back 3, with that number of CB's if it is to be a back 3 we'll need another one or two in yet. |  |
|  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 11:40 - Jul 20 with 1098 views | Bellevue_Blue |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 11:30 - Jul 20 by Cheltenham_Blue | With Diop, we have 4 senior CB's following Baggott leaving. People have gone very early on a back 3, with that number of CB's if it is to be a back 3 we'll need another one or two in yet. |
I think the jumping to conclusions comes from the fact that our captain and best defender plays RCB and now there is Diop who also plays there and is coming in to start games. One isn't going to move to the left so that likely means we plan to play with a 3. |  | |  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 11:43 - Jul 20 with 1060 views | NthQldITFC | 3-4-2-1 / 5-2-2-1 gets Davis a bit more width, which could be our best outlet again, but it's probably somewhere in between in reality, like what Kieran said/did. Using currently available / rumoured, maybe something like: ------------------------Emersonn -----------------Egeli-------------------Fatawu Davis------------------------Morita --------------Matusiwa-------------------Johnson -------Greaves--------------------Diop ----------------------O'Shea ---------------------Scherpen dropping into a defensive: --------------------Emersonn ---------Egeli----------------------Fatawu --------------Matusiwa--Morita Davis--Greaves--O'Shea--Diop--Johnson ---------------------Scherpen |  |
|  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 11:43 - Jul 20 with 1051 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 11:40 - Jul 20 by Bellevue_Blue | I think the jumping to conclusions comes from the fact that our captain and best defender plays RCB and now there is Diop who also plays there and is coming in to start games. One isn't going to move to the left so that likely means we plan to play with a 3. |
That's all good. My point was, if we are playing a 3, we still need more at CB. |  |
|  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 11:46 - Jul 20 with 1013 views | TownieRob |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 11:43 - Jul 20 by Cheltenham_Blue | That's all good. My point was, if we are playing a 3, we still need more at CB. |
I agree. If we are playing with 3 CB's we need 5 I think. We definitely need another left-footed CB also. |  | |  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 11:53 - Jul 20 with 920 views | DanTheMan |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 11:30 - Jul 20 by Cheltenham_Blue | With Diop, we have 4 senior CB's following Baggott leaving. People have gone very early on a back 3, with that number of CB's if it is to be a back 3 we'll need another one or two in yet. |
Agreed. Not to say we won't mix it up, but we'd need at least another one to play it consistently. |  |
|  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 11:58 - Jul 20 with 890 views | tractorboy1978 |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 11:46 - Jul 20 by TownieRob | I agree. If we are playing with 3 CB's we need 5 I think. We definitely need another left-footed CB also. |
You could probably pencil Furlong is as a right sided CB too. If we play with 3 at the back then he is more likely to be an option there than as a RWB/RW. You need attacking output from that position. |  | |  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 12:02 - Jul 20 with 849 views | surreyblue |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 11:58 - Jul 20 by tractorboy1978 | You could probably pencil Furlong is as a right sided CB too. If we play with 3 at the back then he is more likely to be an option there than as a RWB/RW. You need attacking output from that position. |
I agree with that - although I see that as the sixth CB and providing cover across both positions (particularly if we think that a 3atb should really be a 5atb in certain games). So assuming we sign Diop we would still likely want one more. |  | |  | Login to get fewer ads
| If it is 3 at the back... on 12:04 - Jul 20 with 838 views | LandOfMickyStockwell | 3421 Gary O'Neil used 4231 and 3421 at Strasbourg. Enciso sometimes playing the front man if 3421. |  | |  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 12:07 - Jul 20 with 806 views | GlasgowBlue | Possibly ......... GK: Scherpen CD: O'Shea/ Diop/ Greaves WB: Johnson/ Davis CMF: Matusiwa/ Morita 10: Clarke/ Fatawu CF: New Signing. |  |
|  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 12:46 - Jul 20 with 681 views | billlm | I'd think away from home it will be 3 centre backs, At home unless it's the big 6-8 not so sure, |  | |  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 12:53 - Jul 20 with 629 views | Len_Brennan |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 12:07 - Jul 20 by GlasgowBlue | Possibly ......... GK: Scherpen CD: O'Shea/ Diop/ Greaves WB: Johnson/ Davis CMF: Matusiwa/ Morita 10: Clarke/ Fatawu CF: New Signing. |
A rousing endorsement of Emersonn there! |  |
|  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 12:54 - Jul 20 with 614 views | GlasgowBlue |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 12:53 - Jul 20 by Len_Brennan | A rousing endorsement of Emersonn there! |
I think it's been universally accepted that Emersonn will not be our main striker. |  |
|  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 12:55 - Jul 20 with 611 views | Kentish_Tractor |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 11:43 - Jul 20 by NthQldITFC | 3-4-2-1 / 5-2-2-1 gets Davis a bit more width, which could be our best outlet again, but it's probably somewhere in between in reality, like what Kieran said/did. Using currently available / rumoured, maybe something like: ------------------------Emersonn -----------------Egeli-------------------Fatawu Davis------------------------Morita --------------Matusiwa-------------------Johnson -------Greaves--------------------Diop ----------------------O'Shea ---------------------Scherpen dropping into a defensive: --------------------Emersonn ---------Egeli----------------------Fatawu --------------Matusiwa--Morita Davis--Greaves--O'Shea--Diop--Johnson ---------------------Scherpen |
Egeli over Jack Clarke!? |  |
|  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 12:57 - Jul 20 with 595 views | NthQldITFC |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 12:55 - Jul 20 by Kentish_Tractor | Egeli over Jack Clarke!? |
Good point - forgot JC somehow. Probably others too. |  |
|  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 13:03 - Jul 20 with 553 views | gsoly | Not sure anyone really plays a 3-5-2 anymore do they? Struggling to think of examples. Agree on the above, can see Furlong as RCB cover. Also think Burns could well be ahead of Johnson in the RWB pecking order, but would assume we'll buy someone to start there. |  | |  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 13:09 - Jul 20 with 505 views | TownieRob |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 12:54 - Jul 20 by GlasgowBlue | I think it's been universally accepted that Emersonn will not be our main striker. |
What universe is that? I havent seen even a suggestion of that. I mean, if true then it's pretty bloody exciting that a 20+ mill striker isnt our main striker. |  | |  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 13:19 - Jul 20 with 450 views | GlasgowBlue |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 13:09 - Jul 20 by TownieRob | What universe is that? I havent seen even a suggestion of that. I mean, if true then it's pretty bloody exciting that a 20+ mill striker isnt our main striker. |
Been widely discussed on here, the Blue Monday discord group, Blue Monday podcast, Kings of Anglia etc. |  |
|  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 13:50 - Jul 20 with 351 views | londonben | I could see Dara playing at RB in a back four. He’s got the pace and looked decent when he played there a couple of times last season. Would fit well as the more defensively minded fullback in the Tuanzebe role from last time, while Leif goes forwards. |  | |  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 13:53 - Jul 20 with 314 views | Wallingford_Boy | Why would we play 3 CBs? He mentioned 4-2-3-1 in his 1st presser. |  |
|  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 13:53 - Jul 20 with 316 views | nodge_blue | 343 didnt work very well for man u last year. Id rather we carried on with 4231 and make sure we have 2 good players in the 2 that can protect the back 4. |  |
|  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 13:54 - Jul 20 with 314 views | Libero |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 13:50 - Jul 20 by londonben | I could see Dara playing at RB in a back four. He’s got the pace and looked decent when he played there a couple of times last season. Would fit well as the more defensively minded fullback in the Tuanzebe role from last time, while Leif goes forwards. |
Yep, I'm expecting him to play right back or right centre half in a 3, since we've signed Diop. |  | |  |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 14:01 - Jul 20 with 278 views | TownieRob |
| If it is 3 at the back... on 13:19 - Jul 20 by GlasgowBlue | Been widely discussed on here, the Blue Monday discord group, Blue Monday podcast, Kings of Anglia etc. |
I must be living in a cave. Havent seen any of that/those. Oh ok then. I look forward to see who our 'main' striker is then. Exciting times. |  | |  |
| |