| Palacios - gracias, pero no! 21:45 - Aug 10 with 5611 views | pablo_canooga |
|  | | |  |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 21:46 - Aug 10 with 5103 views | pablo_canooga |
ATTENTION! Ipswich Town has presented an official proposal by Exequiel Palacios!
However, the offer was considered insufficient by Bayer Leverkusen.
Palacios, in turn, does not see Ipswich as an ideal destination and prefers a transfer to a higher-profile club.
The 27-year-old Argentine midfielder is among the main players of four other Premier League and Bundesliga clubs and must leave Leverkusen this summer.
Leverkusen is willing to negotiate, but demands around €35 million.
Meanwhile, Palacios follows the plans of coach Carles Martínez. | | | |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 21:50 - Aug 10 with 4940 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 21:46 - Aug 10 by pablo_canooga |
ATTENTION! Ipswich Town has presented an official proposal by Exequiel Palacios!
However, the offer was considered insufficient by Bayer Leverkusen.
Palacios, in turn, does not see Ipswich as an ideal destination and prefers a transfer to a higher-profile club.
The 27-year-old Argentine midfielder is among the main players of four other Premier League and Bundesliga clubs and must leave Leverkusen this summer.
Leverkusen is willing to negotiate, but demands around €35 million.
Meanwhile, Palacios follows the plans of coach Carles Martínez. |
Don't get me wrong, I don't think it'll happen. But this doesn't seem like the greatest source, and seems a rehash of last week's stuff. |  |
| |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 21:58 - Aug 10 with 4740 views | pablo_canooga |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 21:50 - Aug 10 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Don't get me wrong, I don't think it'll happen. But this doesn't seem like the greatest source, and seems a rehash of last week's stuff. |
151k followers, so not quite boy in his bedroom!
For what it's worth can see this one rumbling on right up to deadline day. If he hasn't moved by then, then could be interesting. | | | |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 22:01 - Aug 10 with 4620 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 21:58 - Aug 10 by pablo_canooga |
151k followers, so not quite boy in his bedroom!
For what it's worth can see this one rumbling on right up to deadline day. If he hasn't moved by then, then could be interesting. |
FLW have something like 52k and they are notoriously poor.
As I said, it's almost word for word what was said last week. | |
| |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 22:05 - Aug 10 with 4525 views | SuffolkPunchFC |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 21:50 - Aug 10 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Don't get me wrong, I don't think it'll happen. But this doesn't seem like the greatest source, and seems a rehash of last week's stuff. |
The player’s comments do indeed appear to be a respin of last week for sure.
This however sounds slightly more promising.
” However, the offer was considered insufficient by Bayer Leverkusen.”
So, they’re negotiating? |  | | |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 22:18 - Aug 10 with 4303 views | Geordietown68 |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 21:50 - Aug 10 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Don't get me wrong, I don't think it'll happen. But this doesn't seem like the greatest source, and seems a rehash of last week's stuff. |
That was a tweet taken from bild last week before romano posted his exclusive yesterday |  | | |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 22:30 - Aug 10 with 4058 views | Bellevue_Blue |
It looks like they're just an aggregator of Bundesliga news and have jumped to a conclusion here.
No journalist has reported a bid has been rejected.
I also struggle to believe we will be paying them 30M given they are trying to get rid of him .... | | | |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 23:11 - Aug 10 with 3548 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 22:18 - Aug 10 by Geordietown68 |
That was a tweet taken from bild last week before romano posted his exclusive yesterday |
That's what I said. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 23:31 - Aug 10 with 3380 views | andyblue231 |
At least it’s another person to watch and hope fails. The main reason I watch non Ipswich games is because I hate someone involved. | | | |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 23:55 - Aug 10 with 3185 views | armchaircritic59 |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 21:50 - Aug 10 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Don't get me wrong, I don't think it'll happen. But this doesn't seem like the greatest source, and seems a rehash of last week's stuff. |
We have 3 CDM's already, this guy is one too, spends half the time out injured, and thinks he's a midfield maestro. What we really need is a progressive creative CM. Gives us options for different games. |  | | |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 23:56 - Aug 10 with 3180 views | Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior |
Has Newcastle on deadline day written all over it.
Either way he clearly is keeping his options someone what open, we wouldn’t still be in the conversation if not. |  |
| |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 23:58 - Aug 10 with 3146 views | Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 23:55 - Aug 10 by armchaircritic59 |
We have 3 CDM's already, this guy is one too, spends half the time out injured, and thinks he's a midfield maestro. What we really need is a progressive creative CM. Gives us options for different games. |
He’s a ball playing midfielder. | |
| |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 01:18 - Aug 11 with 2915 views | tetchris |
With the wages he is allegedly on I just don’t see this deal happening! | | | |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 04:21 - Aug 11 with 2680 views | Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 01:18 - Aug 11 by tetchris |
With the wages he is allegedly on I just don’t see this deal happening! |
If we have indeed made an official bid and it’s not made up, then the framework of the deal would already have been made with his representatives.
Doesn’t mean the player isn’t confident he won’t get better offer from a bigger club. Also doesn’t mean we are not being potentially being used as leverage but the idea we can’t afford his wages isn’t true.
So IF there has indeed been a formal offer, an agreement or understanding of the players requirements would have already been discussed with his agent.
You don’t bid first and then talk to the agent after, unless you’re playing a video game.
Sunderland could afford over 100k on Xhaka and we can afford over 100k PW on Palacios. Doesn’t necessarily mean we should or there isn’t risk if we get relegated but the numbers work if we want them to. The idea it would unsettle the dressing room or that O’Shea is still our highest paid player is laughable and out of touch in the modern Premier League.
Hell, the manager was on more than most of them last time and that’s basically unheard of. [Post edited 11 Aug 4:24]
| |
| |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 06:19 - Aug 11 with 2313 views | ThatMuhrenCross |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 04:21 - Aug 11 by Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior |
If we have indeed made an official bid and it’s not made up, then the framework of the deal would already have been made with his representatives.
Doesn’t mean the player isn’t confident he won’t get better offer from a bigger club. Also doesn’t mean we are not being potentially being used as leverage but the idea we can’t afford his wages isn’t true.
So IF there has indeed been a formal offer, an agreement or understanding of the players requirements would have already been discussed with his agent.
You don’t bid first and then talk to the agent after, unless you’re playing a video game.
Sunderland could afford over 100k on Xhaka and we can afford over 100k PW on Palacios. Doesn’t necessarily mean we should or there isn’t risk if we get relegated but the numbers work if we want them to. The idea it would unsettle the dressing room or that O’Shea is still our highest paid player is laughable and out of touch in the modern Premier League.
Hell, the manager was on more than most of them last time and that’s basically unheard of. [Post edited 11 Aug 4:24]
|
Well said! Amazes me how many people don’t understand how transfer negotiations work. Go read people! The fact we’re placing an official bid means most of the package for the player has already been agreed in principle. |  |
| |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 06:51 - Aug 11 with 2080 views | franz_tyson |
Wikipedia says he played 18 games last season. In 7 seasons, the most he played was 25 games. For 150k a week?
We're going for 17th place and above.... do we really need a "name" that might be only fit for half the games.
Yes, he's not Kalvin Phillips.... but getting the same vibes of the 'ambition' delusion.
Let a big team take on his contract and ego. We can get a better fit for less money. | | | |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 06:58 - Aug 11 with 2020 views | cressi |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 23:55 - Aug 10 by armchaircritic59 |
We have 3 CDM's already, this guy is one too, spends half the time out injured, and thinks he's a midfield maestro. What we really need is a progressive creative CM. Gives us options for different games. |
My concern is injury record I would probably go elsewhere we need 30 plus games out a player who can generally play the 90 minutes plus. | | | |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 07:39 - Aug 11 with 1733 views | Wacko |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 06:51 - Aug 11 by franz_tyson |
Wikipedia says he played 18 games last season. In 7 seasons, the most he played was 25 games. For 150k a week?
We're going for 17th place and above.... do we really need a "name" that might be only fit for half the games.
Yes, he's not Kalvin Phillips.... but getting the same vibes of the 'ambition' delusion.
Let a big team take on his contract and ego. We can get a better fit for less money. |
He’s had around one injury per season, last season was early on and he did miss a few games until January, but none of his injuries seem to be recurring. The season before he played 38 games -missing four in total because of injury and the rest just on the bench. Your Wikipedia states didn’t include Champions League | |
| |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 08:03 - Aug 11 with 1526 views | SuffolkPunchFC |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 07:39 - Aug 11 by Wacko |
He’s had around one injury per season, last season was early on and he did miss a few games until January, but none of his injuries seem to be recurring. The season before he played 38 games -missing four in total because of injury and the rest just on the bench. Your Wikipedia states didn’t include Champions League |
I don’t know where you got your injury stats, but you’re quite a way out. It is, for me, the main concern. As others have said though, it’s probably the only reason we might be in the conversation.
The club are best to decide if it’s a risk worth taking.
Season Days Injuries Games missed
25/26 155 days 3 28
24/25 54 days 3 8
23/24 48 days 4 9
22/23 74 days 2 15
21/22 63 days 3 11
20/21 94 days 3 18
19/20 40 days 1 7
18/19 64 days 1 14 | | | |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 08:07 - Aug 11 with 1488 views | Cafe_Newman |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 23:31 - Aug 10 by andyblue231 |
At least it’s another person to watch and hope fails. The main reason I watch non Ipswich games is because I hate someone involved. |
That's why we call it the beautiful game - even the most negative reasons get us involved in it. |  |
| FREE PALASTINE FROM ZIONIST BOMBS. FREE LEBANON FROM ZIONIST BOMBS. FREE IRAN FROM ZIONIST BOMBS. |
| |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 08:11 - Aug 11 with 1438 views | Wacko |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 08:03 - Aug 11 by SuffolkPunchFC |
I don’t know where you got your injury stats, but you’re quite a way out. It is, for me, the main concern. As others have said though, it’s probably the only reason we might be in the conversation.
The club are best to decide if it’s a risk worth taking.
Season Days Injuries Games missed
25/26 155 days 3 28
24/25 54 days 3 8
23/24 48 days 4 9
22/23 74 days 2 15
21/22 63 days 3 11
20/21 94 days 3 18
19/20 40 days 1 7
18/19 64 days 1 14 |
I meant one main injury
https://www.transfermarkt.com/ | |
| |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 08:13 - Aug 11 with 1410 views | muccletonjoe |
Can we just concentrate on players who want to come here , rather than chasing shaddows |  | | |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 08:37 - Aug 11 with 1184 views | Cafe_Newman |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 08:13 - Aug 11 by muccletonjoe |
Can we just concentrate on players who want to come here , rather than chasing shaddows |
We're gonna play hard to get and watch him grovel in the dirt, begging us to take him to the Promised Land. [Post edited 11 Aug 8:38]
| |
| FREE PALASTINE FROM ZIONIST BOMBS. FREE LEBANON FROM ZIONIST BOMBS. FREE IRAN FROM ZIONIST BOMBS. |
| |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 08:48 - Aug 11 with 1092 views | ipswichtillidie |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 21:50 - Aug 10 by Cheltenham_Blue |
Don't get me wrong, I don't think it'll happen. But this doesn't seem like the greatest source, and seems a rehash of last week's stuff. |
Exactly this and why would we even bid if we had an indication the players wouldn’t come. Transfers just don’t work like that. |  |
| |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 08:49 - Aug 11 with 1080 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| Palacios - gracias, pero no! on 01:18 - Aug 11 by tetchris |
With the wages he is allegedly on I just don’t see this deal happening! |
Ah here's Towns accountant again.
Knew we could rely on you to let us know we can't afford it.
Is there any chance of £1.50 from petty case to get some post-it notes? | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
