| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover 10:37 - Sep 5 with 18538 views | Axeldalai_lama |
Will be interesting to see how they're compared to environmental groups who did the same and who mainly showed their faces. Were anti terror laws used against them in the end? Weren't there calls by certain sections on the right to run them over?
Let's wait and see. |  | | |  |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 09:54 - Sep 6 with 695 views | Dubtractor |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 08:53 - Sep 6 by Benters |
I wonder if anyone of those that down arrowed me would be so kind to explain to me why it is a good idea ? |
I doubt anyone thinks that the boats are a good thing at all.
We are down voting the bigger boats point, which has already been corrected in this thread. The stats are based on number of people crossing, not the number of boats, and that 'bigger boats' narrative is just the latest attempt to keep the pot stewing. [Post edited 6 Sep 9:56]
|  |
| |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:00 - Sep 6 with 675 views | Dubtractor |
Just seen this shared as a pretty direct comparison.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-
Also saw the story of just stop oil protesters who were jailed for just planning an m25 protest.
2 tier justice indeed...... | |
| |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:00 - Sep 6 with 672 views | StokieBlue |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 09:54 - Sep 6 by Dubtractor |
I doubt anyone thinks that the boats are a good thing at all.
We are down voting the bigger boats point, which has already been corrected in this thread. The stats are based on number of people crossing, not the number of boats, and that 'bigger boats' narrative is just the latest attempt to keep the pot stewing. [Post edited 6 Sep 9:56]
|
It's also a distraction from the fact that the government policy to make it harder to source small boats is working. The smugglers are having to revert to larger but much less frequent crossings that are easier to detect.
SB |  |
| Avatar - M101 - Pinwheel Galaxy |
| |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:01 - Sep 6 with 681 views | Ryorry |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 08:56 - Sep 6 by StokieBlue |
So to confirm, you're asking for a response and explanation after spending your entire return refusing to respond to requests for explanations?
Wow.
SB |
As you’re so interested in people providing answers to your questions these days, any chance of you providing an answer to mine of several years ago, which you repeatedly refused to answer at the time, re what your scientific qualifications were?
Following which refusal to answer, you’ve since jumped on to have an unpleasant, unjustified pop at me several times, including relatively recently. |  |
| |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:07 - Sep 6 with 630 views | Benters |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:01 - Sep 6 by Ryorry |
As you’re so interested in people providing answers to your questions these days, any chance of you providing an answer to mine of several years ago, which you repeatedly refused to answer at the time, re what your scientific qualifications were?
Following which refusal to answer, you’ve since jumped on to have an unpleasant, unjustified pop at me several times, including relatively recently. |
Well apart from that one R. |  |
| |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:11 - Sep 6 with 630 views | StokieBlue |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:01 - Sep 6 by Ryorry |
As you’re so interested in people providing answers to your questions these days, any chance of you providing an answer to mine of several years ago, which you repeatedly refused to answer at the time, re what your scientific qualifications were?
Following which refusal to answer, you’ve since jumped on to have an unpleasant, unjustified pop at me several times, including relatively recently. |
That's a really weird post, should I go through all your posts over the last 5 years and point out all the scientific inaccuracies? Why aren't you concerned about Benters never providing responses to questions? Where have I been concerned at people not answering my questions?
I've barely responded to you in years since that incident because I feel you've become disingenuous with your framing (like you're being here) and you take everything as a slight if it doesn't agree with your narrative. I've deliberately made a point not to reply to you.
Good to see you joining the pile-on though, great work, lovely way to spend a Sunday morning.
And no, I'm not telling you anything about me, especially after someone tried to impersonate me a few weeks ago using personal knowledge that they got from this forum. I'm frankly stunned you would even ask given that happened.
SB | |
| Avatar - M101 - Pinwheel Galaxy |
| |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:14 - Sep 6 with 613 views | balcombeblue |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:00 - Sep 6 by StokieBlue |
It's also a distraction from the fact that the government policy to make it harder to source small boats is working. The smugglers are having to revert to larger but much less frequent crossings that are easier to detect.
SB |
This is all a bit strange. You made a general point earlier in the day:
"I'm sure they are just busy on a Saturday which is understandable and they will be along later to condemn the actions as disgraceful and to point out they might be blocking ambulances and suchlike."
I came on to respond and you downvoted me and now say I was trying to continue a thread for an argument!
You must find that amusing and you're just playing with me. In which case let me know so I can laugh at myself too. |  | | |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:16 - Sep 6 with 595 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 08:53 - Sep 6 by Benters |
I wonder if anyone of those that down arrowed me would be so kind to explain to me why it is a good idea ? |
People probably can't be bothered to explain, because for starters your premise is wrong - we don't thinking letting loads of unvetted men into our country is a good idea. The issue is much, much more nuanced than that.
And we know from years of experience that you're not interested in facts, details, nuance... or politics, frankly, outside of 'Farage: great, whoever the Labour leader is: bad'. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:18 - Sep 6 with 588 views | balcombeblue |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 09:22 - Sep 6 by Hiphopopotamus |
For someone who is all about freedom of speech and expression, you sure do like to tell people what they should and shouldn’t be writing on here. |
You do understand what free speech is don't you?
I also like the 'for someone who is all about......', I thought that was most people? | | | |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:22 - Sep 6 with 564 views | yesjohn99 |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:01 - Sep 6 by Ryorry |
As you’re so interested in people providing answers to your questions these days, any chance of you providing an answer to mine of several years ago, which you repeatedly refused to answer at the time, re what your scientific qualifications were?
Following which refusal to answer, you’ve since jumped on to have an unpleasant, unjustified pop at me several times, including relatively recently. |
I requested evidence from him too on a subject. Never materialised. |  | | |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:27 - Sep 6 with 541 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:01 - Sep 6 by Ryorry |
As you’re so interested in people providing answers to your questions these days, any chance of you providing an answer to mine of several years ago, which you repeatedly refused to answer at the time, re what your scientific qualifications were?
Following which refusal to answer, you’ve since jumped on to have an unpleasant, unjustified pop at me several times, including relatively recently. |
Accidental upvote from me. For someone who regularly claims to be an innocent victim on here, this joining in with the anti-Stokers pile-on (particularly over something from "several years ago") is really not nice and unnecessary. You're better than this. | |
| |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:27 - Sep 6 with 536 views | Ryorry |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:11 - Sep 6 by StokieBlue |
That's a really weird post, should I go through all your posts over the last 5 years and point out all the scientific inaccuracies? Why aren't you concerned about Benters never providing responses to questions? Where have I been concerned at people not answering my questions?
I've barely responded to you in years since that incident because I feel you've become disingenuous with your framing (like you're being here) and you take everything as a slight if it doesn't agree with your narrative. I've deliberately made a point not to reply to you.
Good to see you joining the pile-on though, great work, lovely way to spend a Sunday morning.
And no, I'm not telling you anything about me, especially after someone tried to impersonate me a few weeks ago using personal knowledge that they got from this forum. I'm frankly stunned you would even ask given that happened.
SB |
So you’ve labelled a post asking you for a reply, and stating facts, as “really weird”. My question obviously pre-dated your stalking by several years.
Interesting that you see my asking you to reply to my question as “a pile on”.
Yes, please do post all of my “scientifically inaccurate” and/or “disingenuous” posts from whenever, it’s your own time to waste.
I don’t feel the slightest bit slighted where people are being honest, accurate and genuine. Which you’re not being here - though I actually often do agree with you on various things. | |
| |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:29 - Sep 6 with 524 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:14 - Sep 6 by balcombeblue |
This is all a bit strange. You made a general point earlier in the day:
"I'm sure they are just busy on a Saturday which is understandable and they will be along later to condemn the actions as disgraceful and to point out they might be blocking ambulances and suchlike."
I came on to respond and you downvoted me and now say I was trying to continue a thread for an argument!
You must find that amusing and you're just playing with me. In which case let me know so I can laugh at myself too. |
It's pretty clear what you're doing while feigning innocence. | |
| |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:29 - Sep 6 with 524 views | yesjohn99 |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:27 - Sep 6 by Ryorry |
So you’ve labelled a post asking you for a reply, and stating facts, as “really weird”. My question obviously pre-dated your stalking by several years.
Interesting that you see my asking you to reply to my question as “a pile on”.
Yes, please do post all of my “scientifically inaccurate” and/or “disingenuous” posts from whenever, it’s your own time to waste.
I don’t feel the slightest bit slighted where people are being honest, accurate and genuine. Which you’re not being here - though I actually often do agree with you on various things. |
Balcombe has got him on the run, there’s a new sheriff in town!! Uppa Balcombe Blues! | | | |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:30 - Sep 6 with 525 views | StokieBlue |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:27 - Sep 6 by Ryorry |
So you’ve labelled a post asking you for a reply, and stating facts, as “really weird”. My question obviously pre-dated your stalking by several years.
Interesting that you see my asking you to reply to my question as “a pile on”.
Yes, please do post all of my “scientifically inaccurate” and/or “disingenuous” posts from whenever, it’s your own time to waste.
I don’t feel the slightest bit slighted where people are being honest, accurate and genuine. Which you’re not being here - though I actually often do agree with you on various things. |
Yet you've asked for more personal information today, after the impersonation incident, you don't see the issue here?
I would never ask anyone about their personal life on here, it's for them to voluntarily post or it's off limits. I think it's a hugely unacceptable thing to even ask.
SB [Post edited 6 Sep 10:36]
| |
| Avatar - M101 - Pinwheel Galaxy |
| |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:32 - Sep 6 with 481 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:27 - Sep 6 by Ryorry |
So you’ve labelled a post asking you for a reply, and stating facts, as “really weird”. My question obviously pre-dated your stalking by several years.
Interesting that you see my asking you to reply to my question as “a pile on”.
Yes, please do post all of my “scientifically inaccurate” and/or “disingenuous” posts from whenever, it’s your own time to waste.
I don’t feel the slightest bit slighted where people are being honest, accurate and genuine. Which you’re not being here - though I actually often do agree with you on various things. |
He's obviously not suggesting you're the pile-on all by yourself. One is not a pile! | |
| |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:33 - Sep 6 with 491 views | SitfcB |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:01 - Sep 6 by Ryorry |
As you’re so interested in people providing answers to your questions these days, any chance of you providing an answer to mine of several years ago, which you repeatedly refused to answer at the time, re what your scientific qualifications were?
Following which refusal to answer, you’ve since jumped on to have an unpleasant, unjustified pop at me several times, including relatively recently. |
Eeee’s got ah telescope buh. |  |
| |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:33 - Sep 6 with 478 views | Dubtractor |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:30 - Sep 6 by StokieBlue |
Yet you've asked for more personal information today, after the impersonation incident, you don't see the issue here?
I would never ask anyone about their personal life on here, it's for them to voluntarily post or it's off limits. I think it's a hugely unacceptable thing to even ask.
SB [Post edited 6 Sep 10:36]
|
There have been numerous incidents of people's personal life being used against them on here over the years, I'd agree it is massively off limits unless offered up. Regardless of any of our individual politics or social outlook, we're all entitled to our privacy off here. | |
| |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:34 - Sep 6 with 462 views | yesjohn99 |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:30 - Sep 6 by StokieBlue |
Yet you've asked for more personal information today, after the impersonation incident, you don't see the issue here?
I would never ask anyone about their personal life on here, it's for them to voluntarily post or it's off limits. I think it's a hugely unacceptable thing to even ask.
SB [Post edited 6 Sep 10:36]
|
You’ve been stalked? Blimey. | | | |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:35 - Sep 6 with 460 views | StokieBlue |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:29 - Sep 6 by yesjohn99 |
Balcombe has got him on the run, there’s a new sheriff in town!! Uppa Balcombe Blues! |
You've been really weird towards me for a while now. I have no idea what post you are referring to about evidence and I would prefer you stopped following me around the forum.
SB | |
| Avatar - M101 - Pinwheel Galaxy |
| |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:36 - Sep 6 with 453 views | positivity |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 00:55 - Sep 6 by balcombeblue |
Because it was a large scale, often violent period of demonstration. So why not? |
odd that your mind should go to a black-led march, when there's more violent and more recent right-wing protests that have happened. | |
| |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:37 - Sep 6 with 449 views | balcombeblue |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:29 - Sep 6 by The_Flashing_Smile |
It's pretty clear what you're doing while feigning innocence. |
Incorrect assumption. I simply don't respond well to the personal nature of many posts towards me. I haven't resorted to name calling or assuming a false intention from someone and I won't start now.
I don't want a pile on of SB, or anyone else for that matter. I actually enjoy reading and responding to many of his posts, that's my nature and hopefully he sees that. We don't agree on much at all, but who cares? isn't that the point?
It's not a kids playground. Just make sure the same standards are applied to everyone. | | | |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:38 - Sep 6 with 444 views | balcombeblue |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:36 - Sep 6 by positivity |
odd that your mind should go to a black-led march, when there's more violent and more recent right-wing protests that have happened. |
We've had some good exchanges before. I don't like the applied nature of your post at all and hopefully you'll retract it. | | | |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:39 - Sep 6 with 435 views | positivity |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 07:41 - Sep 6 by GlasgowBlue |
I recall posting about a pro Palestine convoy driving through a Jewish area of north London chanting “Fcuk the Jews, rape their daughters” a few years back. Didn’t get any condemnation from “a certain element” on here. Did get some “but Israel” Whatabouttery. Which neatly brings us back to the point Dubtractor was making last night.
Anyway, can I please give my apologies for being absent for the rest of the day. At a Northern Soul alldayer. Don’t want my silence to be interpreted as complicity if anything kicks off in the news today. |
don't remember anyone saying that was fine, or "it was peaceful, so it's not a problem" as here? who condoned or supported it? | |
| |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:40 - Sep 6 with 427 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| These balaclava wearing chaps in Dover on 10:37 - Sep 6 by balcombeblue |
Incorrect assumption. I simply don't respond well to the personal nature of many posts towards me. I haven't resorted to name calling or assuming a false intention from someone and I won't start now.
I don't want a pile on of SB, or anyone else for that matter. I actually enjoy reading and responding to many of his posts, that's my nature and hopefully he sees that. We don't agree on much at all, but who cares? isn't that the point?
It's not a kids playground. Just make sure the same standards are applied to everyone. |
You haven't been here long, have you? It's very much a kid's playground in here! | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
