| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? 13:47 - Nov 25 with 956 views | Metal_Hacker |
Seemingly not working as a 4-3-3 or at least the way the players are asked to play it. The two wide front men are too far away from the central guy all the time so...time to change it up utilising what we have available
Holy
Chambers - Woolfy - McGuinness - Ward
Edwards - Downes - Dozzell - Bennetts or Lankester
Norwoord - Jackson
Both wide midfielders taking the time to swap flanks on occasion to keep the opposition on their toes and also to utilise Edwards in a way that makes him effective (coming in from the left)
|  |
| |  |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 13:49 - Nov 25 with 935 views | jayessess |
3 of those players aren't available. |  |
| |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 13:55 - Nov 25 with 916 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 13:49 - Nov 25 by jayessess |
3 of those players aren't available. |
I would've said "in the ideal world" so I stand corrected by your infinite wisdom and my oversight BUT if all available
Dozzell back imminently , do we know the extent of Edwards' injury ?
The issue I'd forgotten about was my inclusion of Flynn.....anyone else in there I couldn't trust .
Huws ? Nope
McGavin ?Nope in experienced
Ya know what...Ill get my coat !!
There has to be a solution ffs | |
| |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 13:55 - Nov 25 with 916 views | BLUEBEAT |
Filling the midfield with appropriate players would be an issue for Saturday but I would like to see this formation used again longterm.
Perhaps starting 4-4-1-1 with Hawkins starting with Norwood and then being replaced by Jackson once he has softened them up.... |  |
| |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 13:56 - Nov 25 with 918 views | itfcjoe |
You've forgotten we are hopeless when we play 2 up front, despite persisting with it all last season |  |
| |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 13:59 - Nov 25 with 906 views | Illinoisblue |
Doesn’t have to be either or. A good manager will react and adapt as needed. |  |
| |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:01 - Nov 25 with 898 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 13:59 - Nov 25 by Illinoisblue |
Doesn’t have to be either or. A good manager will react and adapt as needed. |
What amazes me is how we seem to be the only team I know that cannot and will not change formation mid game to mix it up
Brain dead management and pi55 poor tactically | |
| |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:03 - Nov 25 with 889 views | itfcjoe |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:01 - Nov 25 by Metal_Hacker |
What amazes me is how we seem to be the only team I know that cannot and will not change formation mid game to mix it up
Brain dead management and pi55 poor tactically |
Especially when we changed formation for basically every single game last season, and sometimes 2-3 times mid game | |
| |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:05 - Nov 25 with 873 views | BloomBlue |
PL said we're hopeless at 4-4-2, so go with the Leeds formation from last/this season of 3-3-3-1 |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:07 - Nov 25 with 871 views | bobbyramsey |
What, no Judge? That'll never work.... |  | | |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:08 - Nov 25 with 860 views | MrTown |
We are hopeless with 2 up top don't ya know.
Like we've been super successful sexy in 4-3-3. |  |
| |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:09 - Nov 25 with 856 views | Keaneish |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 13:56 - Nov 25 by itfcjoe |
You've forgotten we are hopeless when we play 2 up front, despite persisting with it all last season |
Ironically we had an unbeaten run stretching 10 games with it and we still weren’t great. At least the Norwood - Jackson partnership was a positive. |  |
| |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:10 - Nov 25 with 856 views | jayessess |
Don't think it matters too much what formation we play when the coaching and tactical detail is so clearly absent. | |
| |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:10 - Nov 25 with 854 views | tractorboy1978 |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:01 - Nov 25 by Metal_Hacker |
What amazes me is how we seem to be the only team I know that cannot and will not change formation mid game to mix it up
Brain dead management and pi55 poor tactically |
And when we have 3 strikers on the bench. But no Dobra who would suit 4-3-3? It's almost like he makes things up on the spot and doesn't know what he's doing. |  | | |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:13 - Nov 25 with 846 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:03 - Nov 25 by itfcjoe |
Especially when we changed formation for basically every single game last season, and sometimes 2-3 times mid game |
I do get the feeling PL is perhaps trying with some sort of message to ME. If it is true that ME has suggested this 433 approach at the start of the season with expansive flowing ,high pressing football ,I get the feeling PL is now digging his heels in and can now turn around when hopefully the inevitable happens and blame his boss
Oh I dunno....I'm just lost for ideas, words and totally frustrated beyond belief
To think this is the 40th anniversary of our biggest ever achievement to date that will never ever be replicated again by a club of our size / stature
Makes my blood boil | |
| |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:18 - Nov 25 with 821 views | Garv |
With the right midfield and Norwood fit and on form, like he looked last night, I think we'll be okay. Probably not brilliant, there's nothing to suggest this squad can be brilliant, but okay.
Trouble is, take out Downes, Dozzell, Bishop, even Nolan, and it's a mess. |  |
| |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:18 - Nov 25 with 819 views | MrTown |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:10 - Nov 25 by jayessess |
Don't think it matters too much what formation we play when the coaching and tactical detail is so clearly absent. |
I think you are ultimately right. Although 4-4-2 is the one of the easiest systems to organise defensively, Lambert would still balls it up.
However, we can't really on a coaching, because we don't have a coach.
So we have to rely on the indivduals, and when you have Jackson/Norwood available, ultimately I feel they need to be on the same pitch together, because they current are our biggest threats you feel. | |
| |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:25 - Nov 25 with 803 views | BlueBadger |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:18 - Nov 25 by Garv |
With the right midfield and Norwood fit and on form, like he looked last night, I think we'll be okay. Probably not brilliant, there's nothing to suggest this squad can be brilliant, but okay.
Trouble is, take out Downes, Dozzell, Bishop, even Nolan, and it's a mess. |
We'd probably still pass it around endlessly at the back and then lump it. And he'd still pick Judge.
To play wide. |  |
| |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:26 - Nov 25 with 799 views | MrTown |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:25 - Nov 25 by BlueBadger |
We'd probably still pass it around endlessly at the back and then lump it. And he'd still pick Judge.
To play wide. |
It's called Lambo-Ball, will you get to grips with modern football ffs. | |
| |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:39 - Nov 25 with 771 views | BlueBadger |
There's no way he's doing that.
1. He's not a good enough tactician or coach tome it work
2. There's no place for Judge in that formation. | |
| |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:53 - Nov 25 with 748 views | reusersfreekicks |
It's not the system at fault |  | | |
| Time for a change to 4-4-2 ? on 14:56 - Nov 25 with 739 views | MrTown |
Please note; you are talking about a manager who once said that systems meant nothing.
I need say no more. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
