By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Obviously I can't speak with any authority on what's going on inside ITFC but I really think you're thinking too much about it and Cook's job is safer than you think (for now).
Cook is no-where near the exit door yet - the club have invested far too much money in him and the players he signed for them to bin him any time soon. A number of the players only came here for him, and although as somone said at the time, we have put alot of (if not all) our eggs in a Paul Cook shaped basket, the end is not coming any time soon for him.
Other than Ryan Lowe at Plymouth, I am also struggling to think of any managers who I would want.
The club are not going to sack Cook after a slow start to the season with a brand new team.
In recent weeks: We got beat by a better team on Tuesday, which came as no surprise to most fans. We did enough at Sunderland (6th) and Plymouth (3rd) to get at least a point. We dismantled Wycombe (2nd) and Portsmouth (9th). We deserved at least a point against Oxford (7th) and the point we took from Sheff W (5th), albeit were fortunate at the end.
We are joint top scorers in the division.
4
Is this the way it's going to go?... on 17:22 - Nov 25 with 942 views
Is this the way it's going to go?... on 17:13 - Nov 25 by xrayspecs
Why do you bother positing such nonsense?
The club are not going to sack Cook after a slow start to the season with a brand new team.
In recent weeks: We got beat by a better team on Tuesday, which came as no surprise to most fans. We did enough at Sunderland (6th) and Plymouth (3rd) to get at least a point. We dismantled Wycombe (2nd) and Portsmouth (9th). We deserved at least a point against Oxford (7th) and the point we took from Sheff W (5th), albeit were fortunate at the end.
We are joint top scorers in the division.
Whilst I don't think the OP is correct. I do find your reply slightly odd in that you've outlined the fact we lost games we shouldn't have done. Drew a game we were lucky to draw in. And beat 2 sides.
On the goal front. Other than 3 games it's 20 goals in 16 games.. is that prolific? Of course it's easy to say take away 3 games.. but overall is 20 across 16 a top goal scoring return or do 3 games make it look better than it is?
Is this the way it's going to go?... on 17:22 - Nov 25 by chrismakin
Whilst I don't think the OP is correct. I do find your reply slightly odd in that you've outlined the fact we lost games we shouldn't have done. Drew a game we were lucky to draw in. And beat 2 sides.
On the goal front. Other than 3 games it's 20 goals in 16 games.. is that prolific? Of course it's easy to say take away 3 games.. but overall is 20 across 16 a top goal scoring return or do 3 games make it look better than it is?
We've only scored 2 in 6 recently.
[Post edited 25 Nov 2021 17:26]
Not at all.
With the exception of Rotherham, we have played at least as well as the other sides I mentioned in the top half of the table and could/should have had more points than we have from those games. I do not agree with you that "we lost games we should not have lost". They were close games and we were competitive.
As I was clearly talking about league games, we have scored 7 in the last 6 games.
0
Is this the way it's going to go?... on 17:50 - Nov 25 with 798 views
I can’t say for certain. But I think this scenario is even less likely than James Norwood going a full 24 hours without indulging in some tw*ttish behaviour.