Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. 20:11 - Feb 7 with 2986 views | LeistonBlue | To advertise and sell iFollow audio passes for tonight, despite knowing full well that people could listen to it for free on bbc sounds? Seems like they’re just hoping people don’t notice it’s on bbc and throw away £2.50 for no reason.. |  | | |  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:17 - Feb 7 with 2805 views | Cheltenham_Blue | Every penny counts. |  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:17 - Feb 7 with 2788 views | SitfcB | If people are silly enough to pay that then let them FA Cup commentary always been allowed online etc. |  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:19 - Feb 7 with 2750 views | Ryorry | And then having paid, people found it not working ... |  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:20 - Feb 7 with 2717 views | The_Flashing_Smile | Isn't it just automatically there, and because that's what iFollow offers rather than anything to do with the club specifically? I don't think they've cynically done it. Not seen it "advertised". |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:23 - Feb 7 with 2631 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:20 - Feb 7 by The_Flashing_Smile | Isn't it just automatically there, and because that's what iFollow offers rather than anything to do with the club specifically? I don't think they've cynically done it. Not seen it "advertised". |
I think sometimes people forget the club is a business. I've been loyal to Tesco's for fooking years, I'm still waiting for one of their staff to say to me, "I wouldn't bother if I were you; you can get that cheaper at Morrisons mate" [Post edited 7 Feb 2023 20:32]
|  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:24 - Feb 7 with 2615 views | DJR | And also paying for a product that is not as good as the free Radio Suffolk commentary. |  | |  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:30 - Feb 7 with 2479 views | Garv | Does the audio pass just offer radio commentary or is it Glenn W? |  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:35 - Feb 7 with 2377 views | TheMoralMajority |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:30 - Feb 7 by Garv | Does the audio pass just offer radio commentary or is it Glenn W? |
Most likely Glenn W, so an argument that it is a different product. Also, the only legitimate way for non-UK residents to listen to the game. |  |
| ...but do signatures really work? |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:37 - Feb 7 with 2331 views | Dyland | Not really... isn't it a different commentary team these days? RS is better imo but each to their own. Edit: And as (the welcome return of) Majorers notes, it's for overseas as well. [Post edited 7 Feb 2023 20:45]
|  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:44 - Feb 7 with 2207 views | Illinoisblue |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:30 - Feb 7 by Garv | Does the audio pass just offer radio commentary or is it Glenn W? |
It’s not GW - he tweeted he couldn’t get time off work to make it to the game. (Legit, not making that up) |  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:46 - Feb 7 with 2126 views | Garv |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:35 - Feb 7 by TheMoralMajority | Most likely Glenn W, so an argument that it is a different product. Also, the only legitimate way for non-UK residents to listen to the game. |
Yep. Not cheeky at all really. |  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:53 - Feb 7 with 2029 views | Swansea_Blue | It’s probably more lazy than cheeky. There’s a service and it’s running as normal. Nobody’s probably had the time or thought to disrupt the system (should have got Banksy on the case!) and point people to the Beeb instead. That could have been a bit of detail that had earned them some credit, but probably not a lot and it not that important. Most people would know it’s on the Beeb I’d have thought. |  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:56 - Feb 7 with 1974 views | LeistonBlue |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:35 - Feb 7 by TheMoralMajority | Most likely Glenn W, so an argument that it is a different product. Also, the only legitimate way for non-UK residents to listen to the game. |
Pretty sure you can listen to bbc sounds abroad, no? |  | |  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:59 - Feb 7 with 1944 views | TheMoralMajority |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:56 - Feb 7 by LeistonBlue | Pretty sure you can listen to bbc sounds abroad, no? |
Nope, football matches are blocked internationally [Post edited 7 Feb 2023 20:59]
|  |
| ...but do signatures really work? |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 21:04 - Feb 7 with 1878 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:53 - Feb 7 by Swansea_Blue | It’s probably more lazy than cheeky. There’s a service and it’s running as normal. Nobody’s probably had the time or thought to disrupt the system (should have got Banksy on the case!) and point people to the Beeb instead. That could have been a bit of detail that had earned them some credit, but probably not a lot and it not that important. Most people would know it’s on the Beeb I’d have thought. |
Also, I don't think iFollow would take too kindly to the club advertising another (free) service instead of the one they're contracted to. |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 21:04 - Feb 7 with 1881 views | WicklowBlue |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 20:59 - Feb 7 by TheMoralMajority | Nope, football matches are blocked internationally [Post edited 7 Feb 2023 20:59]
|
Indeed geolocked to UK only. A short trip on VPN Airlines would resolve thought I would think. |  | |  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 21:15 - Feb 7 with 1771 views | Ryorry |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 21:04 - Feb 7 by WicklowBlue | Indeed geolocked to UK only. A short trip on VPN Airlines would resolve thought I would think. |
But it was because I'd fallen asleep in The Netherlands that I found I couldn't get the RS comm online - just kept getting audio message that comm wasn't available "for contractual reasons". Took the fastest ever flight back to Blighty for me to get dear ol Brenners dulcet tones 😂 [Post edited 7 Feb 2023 21:15]
|  |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 21:20 - Feb 7 with 1716 views | TheMoralMajority |
Oh, it does, certainly. However iFollow is the only legitimate way to access comms overseas [Post edited 7 Feb 2023 21:20]
|  |
| ...but do signatures really work? |
|  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 21:25 - Feb 7 with 1660 views | DJR |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 21:20 - Feb 7 by TheMoralMajority | Oh, it does, certainly. However iFollow is the only legitimate way to access comms overseas [Post edited 7 Feb 2023 21:20]
|
It may not strictly be legitimate but a Brit abroad listening to football commentary isn't, so far as I am aware, depriving anyone of any revenues, given there won't be a local football commentary on the game. EDIT: Actually that's wrong. I suppose I-follow is being deprived of the revenue. [Post edited 7 Feb 2023 21:27]
|  | |  |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 21:27 - Feb 7 with 1630 views | TheMoralMajority |
Anyone else think it’s a bit cheeky of the club.. on 21:25 - Feb 7 by DJR | It may not strictly be legitimate but a Brit abroad listening to football commentary isn't, so far as I am aware, depriving anyone of any revenues, given there won't be a local football commentary on the game. EDIT: Actually that's wrong. I suppose I-follow is being deprived of the revenue. [Post edited 7 Feb 2023 21:27]
|
You get no arguments from me. Regional blocks in a globalized internet make zero sense. It's an antiquated model. |  |
| ...but do signatures really work? |
|  |
| |